Advertisement

Parliamentary Open Big Data: A Case Study of the Norwegian Parliament’s Open Data Platform

  • Lasse Berntzen
  • Rania El-Gazzar
  • Marius Rohde Johannessen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 341)

Abstract

The paper presents a case study on the use of open big data in the Norwegian Parliament. A set of policy documents was examined to find motivation for publishing open data. The case study was based on an examination of the parliament website, combined with document studies and interviews. The paper concludes that third parties have used open data to create new applications that generate value for their users. Applying our findings to the open government benchmarking framework, we identify some national barriers and possible solutions to further promote the use and publication of open data.

Keywords

Open data Big data Parliament Case study 

References

  1. 1.
    Open Knowledge International: The Open Definition. https://opendefinition.org. Accessed 31 May 2018
  2. 2.
    Laney, D.: 3D data management: controlling data, volume, velocity, and variety. Technical report. META Group (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marr, B.: Big Data – Using Smart Big Data Analytics and Metrics to Make Better Decisions and Improve Performance. Wiley, Hoboken (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation: Meld. St. 27 (2015–2016) Digital agenda for Norway – ICT for a simpler everyday life and increased productivity (2016). https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/digital-agenda-for-norway-in-brief/id2499897/. Accessed 31 May 2018
  5. 5.
    Berntzen, L., Healy, M., Hahamis, P., Dunville, D., Esteves, J.: Parliamentary web presence – a comparative review. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on e-Government (ICEG 2006), Pittsburgh, USA, 12–13 October 2006, pp. 17–25. Academic Conferences International (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clarke, A., Margetts, H.: Governments and citizens getting to know each other? Open, closed, and big data in public management reform. Policy & Internet 6(4), 393–417 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, H., Chiang, R.H.L., Storey, V.C.: Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q. 36(4), 1165–1188 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hardy, K., Maurushat, A.: Opening up government data for big data analysis and public benefit. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 33(1), 30–37 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marton, A., et al.: Reframing open big data. In: The 21st European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–12 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manag. 29(4), 258–268 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janssen, M., van den Hoven, J.: Big and open linked data (BOLD) in government: a challenge to transparency and privacy? Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 363–368 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Conradie, P., Choenni, S.: On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, 10–17 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    World Wide Web Foundation: Open Data Barometer (2015). http://opendatabarometer.org/doc/3rdEdition/ODB-3rdEdition-Methodology.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2018
  14. 14.
    Bertot, J.C., et al.: Big data, open government and e-government: issues, policies and recommendations. Inf. Polity 19(1–2), 5–16 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Omar, A., Bass, J.M., Lowit, P.: A grounded theory of open government data: a case study. in the UK. In: UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: Open data policies, their implementation and impact: a framework for comparison. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(1), 17–29 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Veljković, N., Bogdanović-Dinić, S., Stoimenov, L.: Benchmarking open government: an open data perspective. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(2), 278–290 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policy-making. In: Wimmer, Maria A., Janssen, M., Scholl, Hans J. (eds.) EGOV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8074, pp. 38–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yin, R.K.: Designing case studies: identifying your case(s) and establishing the logic of your case study. In: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn, pp. 25–66. SAGE Publications, London (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Darke, P., Shanks, G., Broadbent, M.: Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Inf. Syst. J. 8(4), 273–289 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in is research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4, 74–81 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    James, N., Busher, H.: Credibility, authenticity and voice: dilemmas in online interviewing. Qual. Res. 6(3), 403–420 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    James, N.: The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. Br. Educ. Res. J. 33(6), 963–976 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meho, L.: E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: a methodological discussion. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57(10), 1284–1295 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services: Meld. St. 28 (2014–2015) White Paper on Medicinal Products – Correct use – better health (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Meld. St. 5 (2016–2017) Collaboration in the Nordic countries (white paper) (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Meld. St. 33 (2011–2012) Norway and the United Nations: Common Future, Common Solutions (white paper) (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Norwegian Ministry of Culture: Meld. St. 23 (2011–2012) Visual art (white paper) (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications: Meld. St. 33 (2016–2017) National Transport Plan 2018–2029 (white paper) (2017)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries: Meld. St. 32 (2012–2013) Between Heaven and Earth. Norwegian space policy for business and public benefit (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    NOU 2013:2 Barriers to digital value creation (Official Norwegian Reports) (2013)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    NOU 2016:7 Norway in transition – Career guidance for individuals and society (Official Norwegian Reports) (2016)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    NOU 2017:11 Better assistance Better preparedness. The future organisation of police specialist units (Official Norwegian Reports) (2017)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ministry of Culture: Strategy for Open Data (2017)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ministry of Education and Research: National strategy on access to and sharing of research data (2016). https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/national-strategy-on-access-to-and-sharing-of-research-data/id2582412/. Accessed 31 May 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lasse Berntzen
    • 1
  • Rania El-Gazzar
    • 1
  • Marius Rohde Johannessen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South-Eastern NorwayKongsbergNorway

Personalised recommendations