Advertisement

Mobile Technology Acceptance Model: An Empirical Study on Users’ Acceptance and Usage of Mobile Technology for Knowledge Providing

  • Janusz StalEmail author
  • Grażyna Paliwoda-Pękosz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 341)

Abstract

In this study we applied the technology acceptance model (TAM) to explain users’ acceptance of mobile technology as a medium of knowledge providing. We adjusted the TAM by adding three new constructs: Access to Information, Information Quality, and Information Navigation. The model was tested on a population of 303 respondents using structural equation modeling (SEM). Our findings indicated that information quality and information navigation influence the perceived ease of use and, as a result, perceived usefulness of mobile technology usage that has an impact on the behavioral intention of use and the actual use of these devices. The developed model might comprise the basis for further research in the area of mobile technology usage for knowledge providing.

Keywords

Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Mobile technology Knowledge providing 

Notes

Funding

This research has been financed by the funds granted to the Faculty of Management, Cracow University of Economics, Poland, within the subsidy for maintaining research potential.

References

  1. 1.
    Alderete, M.V.: Mobile broadband: a key enabling technology for entrepreneurship? J. Small Bus. Manag. 55(2), 254–269 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alharbi, S., Drew, S.: Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 5(1), 143–155 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ally, M., Prieto-Blázquez, J.: What is the future of mobile learning in education? Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 11(1), 142–151 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anand, P.R., Kumaran, M.: Information seeking behaviour of shrimp farmers and their perception towards technology dissemination through mobile phones. J. Ext. Educ. 29(1), 5787–5796 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103(3), 411–423 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barata, J., Da Cunha, P.R., Stal, J.: Mobile supply chain management in the Industry 4.0 era: an annotated bibliography and guide for future research. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 31(1), 173–192 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2016-0156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brine, J.: Lifelong learning and the knowledge economy: those that know and those that do not – the discourse of the European Union. Br. Educ. Res. J. 32(5), 649–665 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caudill, J.G.: The growth of m-learning and the growth of mobile computing: parallel developments. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 8(2), 1–13 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davison, C.B., Lazaros, E.J.: Adopting mobile technology in the higher education classroom. J. Technol. Stud. 41(1), 30–39 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dearnley, C., et al.: Using mobile technologies for assessment and learning in practice settings: outcomes of five case studies. Int. J. E-Learn. 8(2), 193–207 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fathema, N., Shannon, D., Ross, M.: Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) In higher education institutions. J. Online Learn. Teach. 11(2), 210–232 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Foray, D., Lundvall, B.: The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. Econ. Impact Knowl. 115–121 (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    French, A.M., Guo, C., Shim, J.P.: Current status, issues, and future of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD). Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (CAIS) 35(10), 191–197 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hair Jr., J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., Nguyen, J.: Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Comput. Educ. 107, 91–99 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hussain, I., Adeeb, M.A.: Role of mobile technology in promoting campus-wide learning environment. TOJET: the Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 8(3) (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Junglas, I., Abraham, C., Ives, B.: Mobile technology at the frontlines of patient care: understanding fit and human drives in utilization decisions and performance. Decis. Support Syst. 46(3), 634–647 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaske, D., Mvena, Z.S.K., Sife, A.S.: Mobile phone usage for accessing agricultural information in Southern Ethiopia. J. Agric. Food Inf. 1–15 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2017.1371023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuciapski, M.: A model of mobile technologies acceptance for knowledge transfer by employees. J. Knowl. Manag. 21(5), 1053–1076 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lundvall, B.A., et al.: The New Knowledge Economy in Europe: A Strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion. Edward Elgar Publishing, Glos (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marangunić, N., Granić, A.: Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14(1), 81–95 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martin, F., Ertzberger, J.: Here and now mobile learning: an experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Comput. Educ. 68, 76–85 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nicholas, D., Clark, D., Rowlands, I., Jamali, H.R.: Information on the go: a case study of Europeana mobile users. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 64(7), 1311–1322 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nord, J.H., Koohang, A., Paliszkiewicz, J.: A report on the state of mobile technologies within organizations. Issues Inf. Syst. 17(1), 70–79 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Núñez, D., Ferrada, X., Neyem, A., Serpell, A., Sepúlveda, M.: A user-centered mobile cloud computing platform for improving knowledge management in small-to-medium enterprises in the Chilean construction industry. Appl. Sci. 8(4), 516 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Owczarek, M.: Analiza cen usług mobilnego dostępu do Internetu w Polsce. Urząd Komunikacji Elektronicznej, Warszawa (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Portela, F., da Veiga, A.M., Santos, M.F.: Benefits of bring your own device in healthcare. In: Machado, J., Abelha, A., Santos, M.F., Portela, F. (eds.) Next-Generation Mobile and Pervasive Healthcare Solutions, pp. 32–45. IGI Global, Hershey (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prusak, L.: Knowledge in Organisations. Routledge, Abingdon (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Román, S., Rodríguez, R., Jaramillo, J.F.: Are mobile devices a blessing or a curse? Effects of mobile technology use on salesperson role stress and job satisfaction. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 33(5), 651–664 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rowles, D.: Mobile Marketing: How Mobile Technology is Revolutionizing Marketing, Communications and Advertising. Kogan Page Publishers, London (2017)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roy, D.: Success factors of adoption of mobile applications in rural india: effect of service characteristics on conceptual model. In: Green Computing Strategies for Competitive Advantage and Business Sustainability, pp. 211–238. IGI Global, Hershey (2018)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sekaran, U., Bougie, R.: Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stal, J., Paliwoda-Pękosz, G.: Mobile technology in knowledge acquisition: a preliminary study. In: Ulman, P., Węgrzyn, R., Wójtowicz, P. (eds.) Knowledge, Economy, Society: Challenges and Tools of Modern Finance and Information Technology, pp. 123–132. Cracow, Poland (2017)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stal, J., Paliwoda-Pękosz, G.: Towards Integration of mobile technology and knowledge management in organizations: a preliminary study. In: Kowal, J. et al. (eds.) Innovations for Human Development in Transition Economies. Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT Management for Global Competitiveness and Economic Growth in Emerging Economies, Wrocław, Poland, pp. 204–214 (2017)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stal, J., Paliwoda-Pękosz, G.: Why M-learning might appeal to organisations? In: Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V., Ghoneim, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, pp. 139–148. Cracow University of Economics, Kraków (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stal, J.: Data personalization in mobile environment: the content adaptation problem. In: Tvrdíková, M., Ministr, J., Rozehnal, P. (eds.). Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Technology for Practice, pp. 181–188. Technical University of Ostrava (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stal, J.: Information and application management: implications for mobile business development. Int. J. Strateg. Manag. Decis. Support Syst. Strateg. Manag. 15(4), 43–52 (2010)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wu, J.H., Wang, S.C.: What drives mobile commerce?: an empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 42(5), 719–729 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yousafzai, S.Y., Foxall, G.R., Pallister, J.G.: Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1. J. Model. Manag. 2(3), 251–280 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceCracow University of EconomicsKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations