Continuance Intention in Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chain Applications: Modelling the Moderating Effect of Supply Chain Stakeholders Trust

  • Samuel Fosso WambaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 341)


If blockchain technologies are emerging as important game changers in the supply chain, this is largely attributed to their high operational and strategic business value. While this high potential is acknowledged by the practitioner’s literature, very few empirical studies have been conducted on the factors explaining the adoption, use and continuance of blockchain-enabled supply chain applications. To fill this knowledge gap, this study extended the expectation-confirmation model (ECM) by integrating the supply chain stakeholders trust to analyze to the continuance intention in blockchain-enabled supply chain applications. The proposed model was tested and supported by the data collected among 344 supply chain professionals in India. The paper ends up with the formulation of important implications for practice and research.


Blockchain Continuance intention Supply chain India Supply chain trust 


  1. 1.
    PWC: Shifting patterns: the future of the logistics industry, p. 20. PWC (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wamba, S.F., et al.: Bitcoin, Blockchain, and FinTech: a systematic review and case studies in the supply chain. Working Paper, Toulouse Business School (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhattacherjee, A.: Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 25(3), 351–370 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oliver, R.L.: A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 17(4), 460–469 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, B.: An empirical investigation of mobile data service continuance incorporating the theory of planned behavior into the expectation – confirmation model. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(10), 7033–7039 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oghuma, A.P., et al.: An expectation-confirmation model of continuance intention to use mobile instant messaging. Telematics Inform. 33(1), 34–47 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun, Y., Jeyaraj, A.: Information technology adoption and continuance: a longitudinal study of individuals’ behavioral intentions. Inf. Manag. 50(7), 457–465 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ayanso, A., Herath, T.C., O’Brien, N.: Understanding continuance intentions of physicians with electronic medical records (EMR): an expectancy-confirmation perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 77, 112–122 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gong, X., et al.: Examining the role of tie strength in users’ continuance intention of second-generation mobile instant messaging services. Information Systems Frontiers (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharma, S.K.: Integrating cognitive antecedents into TAM to explain mobile banking behavioral intention: a SEM-neural network modeling. Information Systems Frontiers (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Hakim, L., Abdullah, N.A.H.N., Ng, E.: The effect of inter-organization trust and dependency on e-procurement adoption: a case of Malaysian manufacturers. J. Electron. Commer. Organ. 10(2), 40–60 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carter, L., Bélanger, F.: The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf. Syst. J. 15(1), 5–25 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker J.-M.: SmartPLS 3 (2014).
  14. 14.
    Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., Newsted, P.N.: A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a monte carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Res. 14(2), 189–217 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Mena, J.A.: An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 40, 414–433 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sun, H., Zhang, P.: An exploration of affective factors and their roles in user technology acceptance: mediation and causality. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. (JASIST) 59, 1252–1263 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chin, W.W.: How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Handbook of Partial Least Squares, pp. 655–690 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Becker, J.-M., et al.: Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Q. 37(3), 665–694 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Toulouse Business SchoolToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations