Advertisement

Board Interlocking and IT Governance: Proposed Conceptual Model

  • Allam HamdanEmail author
  • Abdalmuttaleb Musleh Al-Sartawi
  • Reem Khamis
  • Mohammed Anaswah
  • Ahlam Hassan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 341)

Abstract

This paper seeks to present a new dimension to the dimensions of IT governance; it proposes a model for the board interlocking and the IT governance. This conceptual model is based primarily on the Resource Dependence theory and tries to interpret the relationship between the board interlocking and the IT governance. This paper has theoretically reviewed the existing literature of the board interlocking; it has also added to the real gap in the literature of corporate governance which has not explained the importance of the board interlocking with IT governance. The researchers hope to provides a solid foundation for IT governance in order to supply companies with information about the IT environment surrounding it, the operating procedures, and the effective monitoring of the information systems, the challenges they face, the opportunities they may have, and to provide members of the board of directors with neutral opinion about these opportunities and challenges. The paper presents several contributions at both theoretical and practical levels; it paves the way for researchers to discuss the board interlocking with IT governance which contributes to the development of the theories governing the work of these concepts. It also draws the attention of the companies’ administration to one of the most important practices in forming and structuring the board, i.e. the necessity of connecting the board of directors with managers who are qualified with practical experience in information systems.

Keywords

Board interlocking IT governance Board of director’s Board independence 

References

  1. Allen, M.: The structure of interorganizational elite cooptation: interlocking corporate directorates. Am. Sociol. Rev. 39(3), 393–406 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Musalli, M., Ismail, K.: Intellectual capital performance and board characteristics of GCC banks. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2(1), 219–226 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Au, K., Peng, M.W., Wang, D.: Interlocking directorates, firm strategies and performance in Hong Kong: towards a research agenda. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 17(1), 29–47 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiu, P.C., Teoh, S.H., Tian, F.: Board interlocks and earning management contagion. Account. Rev. 88(3), 915–944 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, G.: Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Adm. Sci. Q. 36(1), 583–613 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dooley, P.: The interlocking directorate. Am. Econ. Rev. 59(2), 314–323 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. Eisenhardt, K.: Speed and strategic choice: how managers accelerate decision making. Calif. Manag. Rev. 32(3), 39–54 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fama, E., Jensen, M.: Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econ. 26(4), 301–325 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fich, E.M., Shivdasani, A.: Are busy boards effective monitors? J. Financ. 61(2), 689–724 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fich, E.M., White, L.: Why do CEOs reciprocally sit on each other’s boards? J. Corp. Financ. 11(1/2), 175–195 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gales, L., Kesner, I.: An analysis of board of director size and composition in bankrupt organizations. J. Bus. Res. 30(3), 271–282 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haunschild, P.: Interorganizational imitation: the impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Adm. Sci. Q. 38(3), 564–592 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hermalin, B.E., Weisbach, M.: Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature. Econ. Policy Rev. 9(1), 7–26 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. Kim, Y.: Board network characteristics and firm performance in Korea. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 13(6), 800–808 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, C., Lim, J., Wang, Q.: Internal and external influences on IT control governance. Int. J. Account. Inf. Systems 8, 225–239 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mindzak, J.: Interlocked boards of directors, voluntary disclosures and earnings quality. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Academic Accounting Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, vol. 37 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. Mol, M.: Creating wealth through working with others: interorganizational relationships. Acad. Manag. Exec. 15(1), 150–152 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. Ornstein, M.D.: Interlocking directorates in Canada: evidence from replacement patterns. Soc. Netw. 4(4), 3–25 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G.R.: The External Control Of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  20. Ribeiro, F., Colauto, R.: The relationship between board interlocking and income smoothing practices. R. Cont. Fin. 27(70), 55–66 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Santos, L., Silveira, A.: Board interlocking no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Finanças 5(2), 125–163 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. Shropshire, C.: The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35(2), 246–264 (2010)Google Scholar
  23. Williamson, E.: The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  24. Zald, M.: The power and functions of boards of directors. Am. J. Sociol. 5(4), 97–111 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allam Hamdan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdalmuttaleb Musleh Al-Sartawi
    • 1
  • Reem Khamis
    • 2
  • Mohammed Anaswah
    • 3
  • Ahlam Hassan
    • 1
  1. 1.Ahlia UniversityManamaBahrain
  2. 2.Brunel UniversityLondonUK
  3. 3.Mutah UniversityMaanJordan

Personalised recommendations