Advertisement

Limiting the Impact of Statistics as a Proverbial Source of Falsehood

  • Yiannis Kiouvrekis
  • Petros Stefaneas
  • Angelika KokkinakiEmail author
  • Nikos Asimakis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 341)

Abstract

This paper presents an early version of a decision-making “eco” system. We refer to it as an “eco” system because it is primarily based on mathematical logic and combines concepts and principles from the fields of statistics, decision theory, artificial intelligence and modeling of human behavior. The primary goal of the proposed approach is to address errors that occur resulting from the misuse of statistical methods. In practice, such errors often occur either owning to the use of inappropriate statistical methods or wrong interpretations of results. The proposed approach relies on the LPwNF (Logic Programming without Negation as Failure) framework of non-monotonic reasoning as provided by Gorgias. The proposed system enables automatic selection of the appropriate statistical method, based on the characteristics of the problem and the sample. The expected impact could be twofold: it can enhance the use of statistical systems like R and, combined with a Java-based interface to Gorgias, make non-monotonic reasoning easy to use in the proposed context.

Keywords

Gorgias Decision theory Mathematical logic Information AI Health care 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded in the context of the project “MIS5005844” under the call for proposals “Supporting researchers with emphasis on new researchers” (EDULLL 34). The project is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund-ESF) by the Operational Programme Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning 2014–2020.

References

  1. 1.
    Strasak, A.M., Zaman, Q., Pfeiffer, K.P., Göbel, G., Ulmer, H.: Statistical errors in medical research–a review of common pitfalls. Swiss Med. Wkly. 137(3–4), 44–49 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy, J.R.: Statistical errors in immunologic research. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 114(6), 1259–1263 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Young, J.: Statistical errors in medical research – a chronic disease? Swiss Med. Wkly. 137, 41–43 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ercan, I., et al.: Misusage of statistics in medical research. Εur. J. Gen. Med. 4(3), 4 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/82507. ISSN 1304-3897MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanif, A., Ajmal, T.: Statistical errors in medical journals (A critical appraisal). Ann. King Edward Med. Univ. 17, 178–182 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark, G.T., Mulligan, R.: Fifteen common mistakes encountered in clinical research. J. Prosthodont. Res. 55(1), 1–6 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2010.09.002. ISSN 1883-1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holmes, T.H.: Ten categories of statistical errors: a guide for research in endocrinology and metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 286(4), E495–E501 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P., Dung, P.M.: The acceptability semantics for logic programs. In: Van Hentenryck, P. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 504–519. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dimopoulos, Y., Kakas, A.: Logic programming without negation as failure. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Logic Programming Symposium, ILPS 1995, pp. 369–384. MIT Press (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kakas, A., Toni, F., Mancarella, P.: Argumentation logic. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA, pp. 12–27 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spanoudakis, N.I., Constantinou, E., Koumi, A., Kakas, A.C.: Modeling data access legislation with Gorgias. In: Benferhat, S., Tabia, K., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10351, pp. 317–327. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60045-1_34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P.: On the semantics of abstract argumentation. J. Log. Comput. 23(5), 991–1015 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exs068MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorgias: An Argumentation System with Abduction. http://www.cs.ucy.ac.cy/nkd/gorgias/
  14. 14.
    Gorgias-B Argumentation Tool. http://gorgiasb.tuc.gr/
  15. 15.
    Fouskakis, D.: Data Analysis using R (2013). ISBN 9786188074156Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fudenberg, D., Levine, D.K.: The Theory of Learning in Games. Levine, D.K. Levine’s Working Paper Archive 2 (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kiouvrekis, Y., Stefaneas, P., Kokkinaki, A.: An argumentation-based statistical support tool. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Applied Methods of Statistical Analysis, Nonparametric Methods in Cybernetics and System Analysis, Krasnoyarsk, The Russian Federation, 18–22 September 2017 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yiannis Kiouvrekis
    • 1
    • 3
  • Petros Stefaneas
    • 1
  • Angelika Kokkinaki
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nikos Asimakis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsNational Technical University of AthensZografouGreece
  2. 2.Department of Management and MISUniversity of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus
  3. 3.Medical Informatics and Physics LabUniversity of ThessalyLarissaGreece

Personalised recommendations