Advertisement

Exploring Determinants of Enterprise System Adoption Success in Light of an Ageing Workforce

  • Ewa SojaEmail author
  • Piotr Soja
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 341)

Abstract

The main goal of this exploratory study is to investigate the role of employees’ age in the perception of factors having an influence on enterprise systems (ES) adoption process. In doing so, the current study draws from opinions of 75 ES practitioners collected during an exploratory research conducted in Poland. The gathered data was analyzed following the grounded theory approach and incorporating open and axial coding. In consequence, a two-level taxonomy of elements including determinants and determinant categories was worked out. Then, the distribution of respondent opinions among different age groups, i.e. younger, middle-aged, and older, was analyzed. The main findings imply that project schedule and employees’ attitudes and involvement are the fundamental determinants emphasized regardless of respondent age. At the same time, older respondents perceived implementation process-related determinants to a greater extent, while the youngest particularly highlighted determinants associated with technology.

Keywords

Enterprise systems Adoption Determinants Age-diverse workforce Ageing Poland 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been financed by the funds granted to the Faculty of Management, Cracow University of Economics, Poland, within the subsidy for maintaining research potential.

References

  1. 1.
    Cleveland, J.N., Hanscom, M.: What is old at work? Moving past chronological age. In: Parry, E., McCarthy, J. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Age Diversity and Work, pp. 17–46. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, J.F.: Contextual determinants and performance implications of information systems strategy planning within South African firms. Inf. Manag. 45, 547–555 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13(1), 3–21 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DeLone, W.H.: Determinants of success for computer usage in small business. MIS Q. 12, 51–61 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Commission: The 2015 Ageing Report. Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013–2060). European Economy 3 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finney, S., Corbett, M.: ERP implementation: a compilation and analysis of critical success factors. Bus. Process Manag. J. 13(3), 329–347 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fisher, G.G., Chaffee, D.S., Tetrick, L.E., Davalos, D.B., Potter, G.G.: Cognitive functioning, aging, and work: a review and recommendations for research and practice. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 22(3), 314–339 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foster, K.: Generation and discourse in working life stories. Br. J. Sociol. 64, 195–215 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grabski, S.V., Leech, S.A., Schmidt, P.J.: A review of ERP research: a future agenda for accounting information systems. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 37–78 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harper, S.: Economic and social implications of aging societies. Science 346(6209), 587–591 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holsapple, C.W., Wang, Y.-M., Wu, J.-H.: Empirically testing user characteristics and fitness factors in enterprise resource planning success. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19(3), 323–342 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keong, M.L., Ramayah, T., Kurnia, S., Chiun, L.M.: Explaining intention to use an enter-prise resource planning (ERP) system: an extension of the UTAUT model. Bus. Strat. Ser. 13(4), 173–180 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kooij, D.T.A.M., DeLange, A.H., Jansen, P.G.W., Dikkers, J.S.E.: Older workers’ motivation to continue to work: five meanings of age. J. Manag. Psychol. 23(4), 364–394 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lech, P.: Time, budget, and functionality?—IT project success criteria revised. Inf. Syst. Manag. 30(3), 263–275 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maertens, J.A., Putter, S.E., Chen, P.Y., Diehl, M., Huang, Y.-H.: Physical capabilities and occupational health of older workers. In: Hedge, J.W., Borman, W.C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Work and Aging, pp. 215–235. Oxford Library of Psychology, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A., Bitner, M.J., Roundtree, R.: The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self service technologies. J. Bus. Res. 56, 899–906 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morgan, J.M., Liker, J.K.: The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process and Technology. Productivity Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pan, M.-J., Jang, W.-Y.: Determinants of the adoption of ERP within the technology–organization–environment framework: Taiwan’s communications industry. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 48, 94–102 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parry, E., Strohmeier, S.: HRM in the digital age – digital changes and challenges of the HR profession. Empl. Relat. 36(4) (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prensky, M.: Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Horizon 9(5), 1–6 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rizzuto, T.E., Cherry, K.E., LeDoux, J.A.: The aging process and cognitive capabilities. In: Hedge, J.W., Borman, W.C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Work and Aging, pp. 236–255. Oxford Library of Psychology, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schalk, R., et al.: Moving European research on work and ageing forward: overview and agenda. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 19(1), 76–101 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soja, E., Soja, P.: Exploring root problems in enterprise system adoption from an employee age perspective: a people-process-technology framework. Inf. Syst. Manag. 34(4), 333–346 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soja, E., Stonawski, M.: Zmiany demograficzne a starsi pracownicy w Polsce z perspekty-wy podmiotów gospodarczych. In: Kurkiewicz, J. (ed.) Demograficzne uwarunkowania i wybrane społeczno-ekonomiczne konsekwencje starzenia się ludności w krajach europej-skich, pp. 173–210. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, Kraków (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Soja, P.: Reexamining critical success factors for enterprise system adoption in transition economies: learning from polish adopters. Inf. Technol. Dev. 22(2), 279–305 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Soja, P., Cunha, P.R.: ICT in transition economies: narrowing the research gap to developed countries. Inf. Technol. Dev. 21(3), 323–329 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Soja, P., Themistocleous, M., Cunha, P.R., Silva, M.M.: Determinants of enterprise system adoption across the system lifecycle: exploring the role of economic development. Inf. Syst. Manag. 32(4), 341–363 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sterns, H.L., Doverspike, D.: Aging and the retraining and learning process in organizations. In: Goldstein, I., Katzel, R. (eds.) Training and Development in Work Organizations, pp. 229–332. Jossey Bass, San Francisco (1989)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stypińska, J.: Starszy pracownik na rynku pracy w Polsce: 40+? 50+? Czy tylko “plus”? Stud. Socjologiczne 217(2), 143–165 (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Truxillo, D.M., Cadiz, D.M., Rineeret, J.R.: The aging workforce: implications for human resource management research and practice. In: Hitt, M.A., Jackson, S.E., Carmona, S., Bierman, L., Shalley, C.E., Wright, D.M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Strategy Implementation, pp. 179–237. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Urick, M.J., Hollensbe, E.C., Masterson, S.S., Lyons, S.T.: Understanding and managing intergenerational conflict: an examination of influences and strategies. Work Aging Retire. 3(2), 166–185 (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van Dalen, H.P., Henkens, K., Schippers, J.: Productivity of older workers: perceptions of employers and employees. Popul. Dev. Rev. 36(3), 309–330 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Volkoff, O., Strong, D.M., Elmes, M.: Understanding enterprise systems-enabled integration. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 14, 110–120 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 870–882 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wille, B., Hofmans, J., Feys, M., De Fruyt, F.: Maturation of work attitudes: correlated change with big five personality traits and reciprocal effects over 15 years. J. Organ. Behav. 35(4), 507–529 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of DemographyCracow University of EconomicsKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceCracow University of EconomicsKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations