Advertisement

Asserting the Principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) in Sub-Saharan Africa in the Extractive Industry Sector

  • Pacifique ManirakizaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights book series (CHREN, volume 3)

Abstract

The extractive industry sector is booming in Africa due to the increasing demand for natural resources worldwide, especially in the West. However, the extractive industry does not necessarily contribute to improve the lives of local communities or to ensure economic growth and development. To the contrary, it dangerously and negatively impacts on communities. In practice, the latter are not yet full participants in the decision-making process, since they are not given a genuine opportunity to provide input on projects, which are basically negotiated and signed by governments and extractive corporations. The book chapter explores the principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), as a tool for affected local communities to articulate their interests and voice their concerns on extractive projects. Although the principle is well-known as a right belonging to indigenous peoples, the argument of this chapter suggests that it should also apply to non-indigenous affected communities without necessarily implying a right to veto extractive projects. Locating FPIC in the human rights resistance theory, the chapter posits that it can help alleviate, resist, balance and overcome persisting asymmetries in power relations between local communities, governments and extractive corporations.

References

  1. Abebe AK (2009) The power of indigenous people to veto development activities: the right to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) with specific reference to Ethiopia. University of Pretoria, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamson R (2017) Vulnerabilities of women in extractive industries. Indian J Women Soc Change 2(1):24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambe-Uva T (2017) Whither the state? Mining codes and mineral resource governance in Africa. Can J Afr Stud/Revue canadienne des études africaines 51:81–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashukem JCN (2016) Included or excluded: an analysis of the application of the free, prior and informed consent principle in land grabbing cases in Cameroon. Potchefstroom Electron Law J 19(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besada H, Martin P (2015) Mining codes in Africa: emergence of a “fourth” generation? Camb Rev Int Aff 28(2):263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buthelezi S (2005) Regional integration in Africa: prospects and challenges for the 21st century. Ikwezi Afrika Publishers, East LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmody P (2011) The new scramble for Africa. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Chareyon B (2015) Impact of the Kayelekera Uranium Mine, Malawi. EJOLT Report No. 21:30–32Google Scholar
  9. Diallo P (2016) The Africa mining vision: a Panacea to the challenges of the African mining sector or another mirage? Leadersh Dev Soc 1(1):1–7Google Scholar
  10. Duruigbo E (2014) Realizing the people’s right to natural resources. Whitehead J Dipl Int Relat 12(1):111–123Google Scholar
  11. Finlay CJ (2015) Terrorism and the right to resist: a theory of just revolutionary war. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodland R (2004) Free, prior and informed consent and the WB Group. Sustain Dev Law Policy 4:2Google Scholar
  13. Heyns C (2001) A “struggle approach” to human rights. In: Soeteman A (ed) Pluralism in law. Springer, New York, pp 171–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hönke J (2009) Extractive orders: transnational mining companies in the nineteenth and twenty-first centuries in the Central African Copperbelt. In: Melber H, Southall R (eds) A new scramble for Africa? Imperialism, investment and development. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, Durban, pp 274–298Google Scholar
  15. Honore T (1988) The right to rebel. Oxf J Leg Stud 8(1):34–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leifsen E, Gustafsson MT, Guzmán-Gallegos MA, Schilling-Vacaflor A (2017) New mechanisms of participation in extractive governance: between technologies of governance and resistance work. Third World Q 38(5):1043–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Locke J (1689) Second treatise of government. Awnsham ChurchillGoogle Scholar
  18. Manirakiza P (2013) Loyola University Chicago International Law Symposium, Keynote address towards an African human rights perspective on the extractive industry. Loyola Univ Chicago Int Law Rev 11(1):6–9Google Scholar
  19. Manirakiza P (2015) The extractive industry sector and human rights law in Africa. Min Law Rev 2016(2):3–15Google Scholar
  20. Manirakiza P (2016) La protection des droits humains à l’ère de l’industrie extractive en Afrique. Criminologie 49(2):118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McNeish JA (2017) A vote to derail extraction: popular consultation and resource sovereignty in Tolima, Colombia. Third World Q 38(5):1128–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Melber H, Southall R (2009) A new scramble for Africa?. In: Melber H, Southall R (eds) A new scramble for Africa? Imperialism, investment and development. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, DurbanGoogle Scholar
  23. Milne S, Adams B (2012) Market masquerades: uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia. Dev Change 43(1):133–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murphy S (2011) Unique in international human rights law: Article 20(2) and the right to resist in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Afr Human Rights Law 11(2):465–494Google Scholar
  25. Obse K (2014) The Arab Spring and the question of legality of democratic revolution in theory and practice: a perspective based on the African Union normative framework. Leiden J Int Law 27(4):817–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pham TT, Jean-Christophe Castella JC, Lestrelin G, Mertz O, Ngoc Le D, Moeliono M, Nguyen TQ, Vu HT, Nguyen TD (2015) Adapting Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) to local contexts in REDD+: lessons from three experiments in Vietnam. Forests 6:2409–2410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roesch R (2016) The story of a legal transplant: the right to free, prior and informed consent in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr Human Rights Law J 16(2):505–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rousseau JJ (1920) The social contract & discourses. J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd/E.P. Duton & Co, London and Toronto/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Rutherford B (2017) Governance and land deals in Africa: opportunities and challenges in advancing community rights. J Sustain Dev Law Policy 8(1):235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schilling-Vacaflor A (2017) Who controls the territory and the resources? Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) as a contested human rights practice in Bolivia. Third World Q 38(5):1043–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Szablowski D (2010) Operationalizing free, prior, and informed consent in the extractive industry sector? Examining the challenges of a negotiated model of justice. Can J Dev Stud/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 30(1–2):111–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Werner K (2017) The role of the state and the transnational in lifting the resource curse. J Sustain Dev Law Policy 8(1):309–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wicomb W, Smith H (2011) Customary communities as people and their customary tenure as culture: what we can do with the Endorois decision. Afr Human Rights Law J 11(2):422–446Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Ottawa, Faculty of LawOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations