Advertisement

Linking Emotion Attributes to Engineering Parameters and Individual Differences

  • Hasti SeifiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems book series (SSTHS)

Abstract

Affective response can dominate users’ reactions to the synthesized tactile sensations that are proliferating in today’s handheld and gaming devices, yet it is largely unmeasured, modelled or characterized. A better understanding of user perception will aid the design of tactile behavior that engages touch, with an experience that satisfies rather than intrudes. Here, we made a first attempt at developing guidelines for affective vibration design. We measured 30 subjects’ affective response to vibrations varying in rhythm and frequency, then examined how differences in demographic, everyday use of touch, and tactile processing abilities contribute to variations in affective response. To this end, we developed five affective and sensory rating scales and two tactile performance tasks, and also employed a published ‘Need for Touch’ (NFT) questionnaire. Subjects’ ratings, aggregated, showed significant correlations among the five scales and significant effect of the signal content (rhythm and frequency). Ratings varied considerably among subjects, but this variation did not coincide with demographic, NFT score, or tactile task performance. These results suggest a link between emotion and engineering parameters but highlight that individual differences in emotion perception are nuanced and cannot be modelled based on user performance or background.

References

  1. 1.
    Field, T.: Touch. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Essick, G.K., McGlone, F., Dancer, C., Fabricant, D., Ragin, Y., Phillips, N., Jones, T., Guest, S.: Quantitative assessment of pleasant touch. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34(2), 192–203 (2010). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763409000190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swindells, C., MacLean, K.E., Booth, K.S., Meitner, M.: A case-study of affect measurement tools for physical user interface design. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface (GI ’06), pp. 243–250 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takahashi, K., Mitsuhashi, H., Murata, K., Norieda, S., Watanabe, K.: Feelings of animacy and pleasantness from tactile stimulation: Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulated body part. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 3292–3297 (2011). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6084177
  5. 5.
    Nagano, H., Okamoto, S., Yamada, Y.: What appeals to human touch? effects of tactual factors and predictability of textures on affinity to textures. In: Proceedings of IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC ’11), pp. 203–208 (2011). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5945486
  6. 6.
    Zheng, Y., Morrell, J.B.: Haptic actuator design parameters that influence affect and attention. In: Proceedings of IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS ’12), pp. 463–470. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levesque, V., Oram, L., MacLean, K.E.: Exploring the design space of programmable friction for scrolling interactions. In: Proceedings of IEEE Haptic Symposium (HAPTICS ’12), pp. 23–30 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peck, J., Childers, T.L.: Individual differences in haptic information processing: the need for touch scale. J. Consum. Res. 30(3), 430–442 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cholewiak, R.W., Collins, A.A.: Individual differences in the vibrotactile perception of a “simple” pattern set. Atten., Percept., Psychophys. 59(6), 850–866 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Epstein, W., Hughes, B., Schneider, S.L.: Perceptual learning of spatiotemporal events: evidence from an unfamiliar modality. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 15(1), 28 (1989). http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xhp/15/1/28/Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Artificial Muscles Inc.: ViviTouch - “Feel the game.”. http://vivitouch.com/. http://vivitouch.com/. Accessed: 28 Sept 2012
  12. 12.
    Guest, S., Dessirier, J.M., Mehrabyan, A., McGlone, F., Essick, G., Gescheider, G., Fontana, A., Xiong, R., Ackerley, R., Blot, K.: The development and validation of sensory and emotional scales of touch perception. Atten., Percept., Psychophys. 73(2), 531–550 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ternes, D., Maclean, K.E.: Designing large sets of haptic icons with rhythm. In: Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios, pp. 199–208. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoggan, E., Raisamo, R., Brewster, S.A.: Mapping information to audio and tactile icons. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI ’09), pp. 327–334 (2009). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1647382
  15. 15.
    Lederman, S.J., Klatzky, R.L.: Haptic perception: a tutorial. Atten., Percept., Psychophys. 71(7), 1439–1459 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris, J.A., Harris, I.M., Diamond, M.E.: The topography of tactile working memory. J. Neurosci. 21(20), 8262–8269 (2001). http://www.jneurosci.org/content/21/20/8262.shortCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaas, A.L., Stoeckel, M.C., Goebel, R.: The neural bases of haptic working memory. In: Human Haptic Perception: Basics and Applications, pp. 113–129 (2008). http://www.springerlink.com/index/p373185430172257.pdf
  18. 18.
    Hollins, M., Bensmaïa, S., Karlof, K., Young, F.: Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: evidence from multidimensional scaling. Percept. Psychophys. 62(8), 1534–1544 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Biggs, S.J., Hitchcock, R.N.: Artificial muscle actuators for haptic displays: system design to match the dynamics and tactile sensitivity of the human fingerpad. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7642 (2010). http://spie.org/x648.html?product_id=847741
  20. 20.
    Orr, M.G., Ohlsson, S.: Relationship between complexity and liking as a function of expertise. Music. Percept. 22(4), 583–611 (2005). http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/mp.2005.22.4.583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alter, A.L., Oppenheimer, D.M.: Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 13(3), 219–235 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H., Dermen, D.: Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service (1976). http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/Manual_for_Kit_of_Factor-Referenced_Cognitive_Tests.pdf
  23. 23.
    Busey, T.A., Tunnicliff, J., Loftus, G.R., Loftus, E.F.: Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7(1), 26–48 (2000). http://www.springerlink.com/index/V247323112X74X2G.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knowles, W.B., Sheridan, T.B.: The “Feel” of rotary controls: friction and inertia. Hum. Factors 8(3), 209–215 (1966). http://hfs.sagepub.com/content/8/3/209.shortCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations