The Problem of Energy Saving and Its Solution in the Conditions of Formation of a New Model of Economic Development

  • Olga Evgenevna Malikh
  • Maria Evgenevna KonovalovaEmail author
  • Olga Yurevna Kuzmina
  • Alexander Michailovich Michailov
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 908)


The relevance of the analyzed issue is caused by the need of an integrated assessment of mineral raw material base for determination of efficiency of stereoscopic subsurface management. The purpose of the article is the analysis of prospects for economic development of subsoil use in the conditions of active use of digital technologies. The inevitability of saving natural resources tendencies in economy in the short term, and also the increasing world competition in this field of activity predetermines the need of further usage of new methods and technologies of prospecting, mining and processing of mineral raw material resources to the finished product in the subsurface management. The leading approach in the study of this issue is the systemic approach allowing justifying effective development of linked industries within innovative subsurface management. The possibility of transition of the Republic of Bashkortostan to low-carbon economy and green growth is assessed on the basis of the data on the potential of exhaustible resources, criteria of economic growth, and also characteristics of the used equipment and digital technologies. The set of offers, promoting increase in resilience of socio-economic and ecological systems of the region, due to the diversification of economy and sustainable governance of natural resources, is proved by the authors. Materials of the paper may be useful in generation of a complex socio-economic development strategy of the region, in particular the section, devoted to the development of innovative subsurface management in the conditions of formation of a new model of the digital economy.


Deterioration of equipment Digital technology Potential of exhaustible resources Subsoil use Urban development 


  1. 1.
    Bogatyreva MR (2014) Transformation of the labour migration management system. World Appl Sci J 30(11):1556–1558Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deliktas E, Günal GG (2016) Economic growth and input use efficiency in low, upper -middle and high incomed countries (1991–2011): a data envelopment analysis procedia. Econ Financ 38:308–317Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Egorova M, Pluzhnic M, Glik P (2015) Global trends of “Green” Economy development as a factor for improvement of economic and social prosperity procedia. Soc Behav Sci 166:194–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goulder LH, Pizer WA (2005) The Economics of climate change. New palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn, Macmillan Publishing, LtdGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henckens MLCM, Driessen PPJ, Ryngaert C, Worrell E (2016) The set-up of an international agreement on the conservation and sustainable use of geologically scarce mineral resources original research article. Resour Policy 49:92–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hui Z, Danxiang A (2011) Environment, energy and sustainable economic growth. Proced Eng 21:513–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kamal A, Shamseldin M (2016) Considering coexistence with nature in the environmental assessment of buildings. HBRC J 13:2362–2373Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malikh OE, Hurmatullina AF, Konovalova ME, Kuzmina OY, Titova NB (2016) Integral assessment of the social and economic development of megacities in Russia. Iejme – Math Educ 11(7):2455–2469Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malikh OE, Polyanskaya IK, Konovalova ME, Kuzmina OY, Tarasyuk OV, Osipova IV (2016) Implementation of the State Economic Policy in the Field of Education. Iejme – Math Educ 11(8):3104–3113Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orlov VP (2010) Geological-prospecting branch in the context of modernization of the economy. Mineral resources of Russia. Econ Manag 2:3–6Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pearson RG (2016) Reasons to conserve nature. Trends Ecol Evol 31:366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petrov OV (2010) Strategic tendencies of innovative use of mineral and raw materials potential of Russian subsoil assets. Mineral resources of Russia. Econ Manag 3:37–41Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rodionov II, Smirnov AL (2016) Equator Principles as a competitive factor of credit institutions on the global financial market. Vestnik of Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletov. Ser Econ Sci 1(7):120–123Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sandifer PA, Sutton-Grier AE, Ward BP (2015) Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosyst Serv 12:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sunstein CR, Reisch LA (2013) Automatically green: behavioral economics and environmental protection. Harv Environ Law Rev 38(1)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tatarkin AI, Petrov OV, Mikhailov BK (2009) Richness of subsoil assets of the Russian Federation: state and tendencies of innovative use. Vestn Russ Acad Sci 9:771–780Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van der Ploeg R (2010) Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing? CESifo Working Paper Series 3125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Evgenevna Malikh
    • 1
  • Maria Evgenevna Konovalova
    • 2
    Email author
  • Olga Yurevna Kuzmina
    • 2
  • Alexander Michailovich Michailov
    • 2
  1. 1.Ufa State Oil Technical UniversityUfaRussia
  2. 2.Samara State University of EconomicsSamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations