Advertisement

The Model for Meeting Digital Economy Needs for Higher Education Programs

  • E. V. BolgovaEmail author
  • G. N. Grodskaya
  • M. V. Kurnikova
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 908)

Abstract

The study is carried out in response to the need to provide the economic digitalization of Russian regions with academic programs developed by national universities. In this regard, the paper is focused on researching into the reasons of the digital agenda disregarding higher education programs and their role in training the staff able to create new digital platforms and technologies, progressively introduce existing tools and decisions. The disclosure of the environment enabling to transform digitalization-based academic programs into an impetus of digital economy of a Russian subject, a driver to develop an innovative sector and a regional university network would address the shortage of highly qualified staff and help Russian regions catch up with the leading countries of digital transformation. The authors used a method of modelling to address the issues of providing regional economic digitalization with higher education programs within the framework of the unanimity of Russian and foreign scientific opinions and the world practice of territorial administration and sectoral governance. The paper presents theoretical and methodical basis for providing regional economic digitalization with higher education programs, provides an interpretation of triple-helix model as a method based on an innovative initiative and the equality of subjects in the chain ‘universities – businesses – governments’, reveals the direction of how to use the model in diversifying academic programs and distributing them spatially. The research has resulted in grounding the theoretical and methodical foundations of modelling as a method to providing regional economic digitalization and regional industries with higher education programs; a model well-balanced with regional and industrial strategies, university research activities; a strategy to implement the model in the economy of Russian regions. The study is scientific and practical value for researching into socio-economic development of Russian subjects and regional university networks, programming educational development.

Keywords

Economic digitalization Higher education Model Region Strategy 

References

  1. 1.
    Decree of the President of Russia dated December 1, 2016, No. 642 On the Strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. http://www.consultant.ru/. Accessed 12 Apr 2018
  2. 2.
    The Rating of Investment Attractiveness of Russian regions RAEX (Expert RA). https://raexpert.ru/rankingtable/region_climat/2017/tab3/. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  3. 3.
    The Rating of the Association of Innovative Russian Regions (2017). http://i-regions.org/images/files/airr17.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  4. 4.
    The Rating of Innovative Development of Russian Regions (2017) Issue 5, Ed. by Gohberg LM (ed) National Research University Higher School of Economics. 12, 14, 19Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Rating by the National Association of Innovations and IT Development, 2015, from http://www.nair-it.ru/pressabout/2015-08-03_kp.php. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  6. 6.
    The Rating by RANEPA (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration) ‘Innovative Business in Russian regions (2018) http://www.i-regions.org/images/files/presentations/RANEPA_26.12.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  7. 7.
    Federal State Statistics Service. http://www.gks.ru. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  8. 8.
    The Rating of Investment Attractiveness of Russian regions RAEX (Expert RA). https://raexpert.ru/docbank/5e2/a5b/897/dd35c089e004153429d3569.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  9. 9.
    Fund ‘The Center for Strategic Developments ‘North-West’’. http://csr-nw.ru. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  10. 10.
    European Innovation Scoreboad (2018). https://www.ewi-vladeren.be/sites/default/files/imce/eu_innovatie_scorebord_2018.pdf. Accessed 02 May 2018
  11. 11.
    OECD. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard (2011). http://oecdru.org/zip/9211048e5.pdf. Accessed 02 May 2018
  12. 12.
    Decree of the President of Russia dated May 9, 2017, No. 203 On the Strategy of information society development in the Russian Federation for 2017–2030. http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71570570/#ixzz5SsGf9m00. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  13. 13.
    Yershova TV, Khohlov YuV (2018) Digital Economy: may it be developed in a specific region. http://www.acexpert.ru/events/x-ezhegodniy-kongress-malogo-i-srednego-biznesa-st.html. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  14. 14.
    Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (1997) Introduction: Universities in the global knowledge economy. In: Etzkowitz H (ed) Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Pinter, London and WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Etzkowitz H (2002) Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Sci Public Policy 29(2):115–128.  https://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781781056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Etzkowitz H (2002) MIT and the rise of entrepreneurial science. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Etzkowitz H (2011) Tripple-helix model. Innovations 4:5–10Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Machlup F (1962) The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton, New-JerseyGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shumpeter J (1982) Theory of Economic Development (Study of Entrepreneurial Profit, Capital, Interest and Conjuncture Cycle), Transl. from Germ. by V. S. Avtonomov et al. Progress, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L’vov DS, Pugachev VF (2001) Mechanism of steady economic growth. Economics of present-day Russia 4:52–58Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Makarov VL (2003) Knowledge economy: lessons for Russia. Bull Russ Acad Sci 73(5):450–456Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suharev OS (2008) Basic principles of institutional and evolutional economics. Vysshaya shkola, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gaponenko AL, Orlova TM (2008) Knowledge management: how to convert knowledge into capital. EHksmo, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Innovational Development: Economy, Intellectual Resources, Knowledge Management (2009) ed. by Mil’ner BZ, INFRA-M, Moscow, RussiaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Popov EV, Vlasov MV (2009) Institutes of knowledge-based minieconomics; ed. by akad. VL Makarov. Academia, Moscow, RussiaGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nureev RM (2012) On the way to understanding institutional nature of innovations. J Inst Stud 4(2):4–10Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nureev RM (2012) Russian economy: problems of innovation mode formation. Hum Cap Vocat Educ 1:18–31Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oveshnikova L, Lebedinskaya O, Timofeev A, Mikheykina L, Sibirskaya E, Lula P (2018) Studying the sector of the russian high-tech innovations on the basis of the global innovation index INSEAD. Perspectives on the Use of New Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Modern Economy (Editors: Elena G. Popkova, Victoria N. Ostrovskaya). Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series 726Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Botot S, Savinsky D (2011) Triple Helix model in Great Britain’s, US and Russia’s regional development. Innovations 4:43–46Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carayannis E, Grigoroudis E (2016) Quadruple innovation helix and smart specialization: knowledge production and national competitiveness. Foresight STI Gov 10(1):31–42.  https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.31.42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Runiewicz-Wardyn M (2009) Innovation Systems and Learning Processes in the EU and US Regions. Economic Research Center Kozminski University in Warsaw. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6836g9xp. Accessed 02 May 2018
  32. 32.
    Haines JK, Olson JS (2015) Accelerating Innovation in Global Contexts. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3sv830h5. Accessed 02 Oct 2018
  33. 33.
    McCray WP (2005) Will small be beautiful? Making Policies for our Nanotech Future. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0vd0v7dx. Accessed 12 May 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    King CJ, Douglass JA (2007) A reflection and prospectus on globalization and higher education: CSHE@50. Results of a Symposium Organized by the Center for Studies in Higher Education University of California. Berkeley. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6gm168pp. Accessed 02 May 2018
  35. 35.
    Schuetzenmeister F (2010) University Research Management: an Exploratory Literature Review. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/77p3j2hr. Accessed 02 May 2018
  36. 36.
    Maki KM (2015) The Institutional Design for University Knowledge Transfer and Firm Creation. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1hn0s8pv. Accessed 19 April 2018
  37. 37.
    Douglass JA (2016) Knowledge based economic areas and flagship universities: A Look at the New Growth Ecosystems in the US and California. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7v10z4gk. Accessed 19 Apr 2018
  38. 38.
    Slota S, Bowker GC (2017) Negotiating science through policy: EarthCube, infrastructure and policy-relevant science. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7n26p6k1. Accessed 29 Apr 2018
  39. 39.
    Suslova T (2011) The possibilities of realizing the idea of triple helix model. Higher Educ Russ 3:147–149Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Borisoglebskaya L, Mikhailov V (2015) The study of efficient forms of innovative development of knowledge intensive and high-tech industries based on triple helix model based Latin American countries. Innovations 9(203):78–86Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Malyshev E (2012) The peculiarities of cooperation of government, business and universities in triple helix model. Bull ZabGU 9(88):103–112Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Surovitskaya G, Gerasimov S (2014) The efficiency of actors in regional innovative systems. Creat Econ 11(95):74–83Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Burdakova G, B’yankin A, Vakhrusheva V (2017) The development of technological entrepreneurship in the region on the basis of the triple helix model. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics 10 (6):172–181.  https://doi.org/10.18721/je.10616
  44. 44.
    Education MIT – Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://web.mit.edu. Accessed 19 Apr 2018
  45. 45.
    Classement Eduniversal 2018 des Meilleurs Masters, MS&MBA (2018). http://www.meilleurs-masters.com. Accessed 06 Apr 2018
  46. 46.
    The Strategy of socioeconomic development of the Samara region until 2030 (2017). http://economy.samregion.ru/upload/iblock/82a/strategiya-so_2030.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2018
  47. 47.
    Working paper of the Skolkovo Centre for digitalization how to understand digitalization (2018). https://cdt.skolkovo.ru/ru/cdt/. Accessed 10 Apr 2018
  48. 48.
    Transport Strategy of the Russian Federation (2018). http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902132678. Accessed 11 May 2018
  49. 49.
    Transport innovations (2018). http://inno-trans.ru/data/documents/IT-31_inet.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2018
  50. 50.
    The paper of the Centre for Breakthrough Researches of the SamSMU “IT in medicine” (2018), Retrieved May, 2018, from http://smuit.ru/about/infrastructure/cpi-it-medicina/. Accessed 02 May 2018
  51. 51.
    Science. Researches. Internet resources by the Samara University (https://ssau.ru/), the Samara State Technical University (https://samgtu.ru/), the Samara State University for Economics (http://www.sseu.ru/). Accessed 03 May 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. V. Bolgova
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. N. Grodskaya
    • 1
  • M. V. Kurnikova
    • 1
  1. 1.Samara State University of EconomicsSamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations