Matrix Model of Cognitive Activity as One of the Meta Basis of Digital Education

  • N. A. TymoschukEmail author
  • E. N. Ryabinova
  • O. A. Sapova
  • V. Oddo
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 908)


Due to the transition to informatization and digital education society focuses on self-education. Digitalization development will demand the search for meta basis in strategic and tactical approaches to education: there will be formalization of educational information adoption by step-by-step implementation of logical schemes of an approximate basis of actions. It is shown that the educational environment has a considerable impact on the preparation of competitive engineers. The education guidance, a workbook and the reference media on the studied subject are modern educational methodological support for creation of necessary conditions to provide sufficient achievement of theoretical material and practical skills to organize effective students’ self-work. The technology of the organization of self-educational students’ activity on the basis of matrix model of cognitive activity is rather simple and clear both for teachers and students, and can be applied to studying of any subject. By means of cognitive and activity matrix all volume of preparation material breaks into four modules, each of which has various level of complexity. The first module contains the simplest tasks of the first level of complexity, the second one includes the tasks of the second level of complexity, etc. Each module contains the optimum number of theoretical data and tasks, both with detailed stage-by-stage analysis and an explanation and for self-work. The presented discretization and formalization of development of the subject by means of matrix model of cognitive activity opens only one of possible ways to digital education.


Cognitive and activity matrix Competitive engineers Digital education Metaeducation Metabases Self-educational activity 


  1. 1.
    Bespalko VP (2010) Nature corresponding pedagogics. National Education, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clarain MV (1997) Innovations in training: metaphors and models. The analysis of foreign experience Nauka Publishing house. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Concept of federal state educational standards of the general education: projects/Russian academy of education; under the editorship of Kondakov AM, Kuznetsov AA (2008) Prosveshchenie, Moscow, 39 pGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gromyko YV (2000) Mental pedagogics: theoretical-practical guidance on the development of the highest models of pedagogical art. Minsk, edition “Technoprint”, p 376Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kolesina KY (2009) Metaproject training: the theory and technologies of realization in educational process. Dissertation. Rostov-on-Don: UFUGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lord FM (1980) Application of item response theory to practical testing problems. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Publ, Hillsdale, N-JGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mayorov AN (2000) The theory and practice of tests’ creation for the systems of education (How to choose, create and use tests for education). Moscow, edition SPUTNIK, p 352Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozerkova IA (2010) Metasubject approach: ways of realization. New educational standards. Metasubject approach. Materials of pedagogic conference, December 17, 2010. Accessed 13 Mar 2018
  9. 9.
    Prokopenko ML (2010) Metasubject content of education in primary school. New educational standards. Metasubject approach. Materials of pedagogical conference, Moscow, December 17, 2010. Accessed 5 Apr 2018
  10. 10.
    Ryabinova EN (2009)The adaptive system of the personified vocational training of students of technical colleges. Mechanical Engineering. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ryabinova EN (2007) Synergetic approach to the construction of individual- corrected educational technology. Synergetrics of natural, technical and social and economic systems: collection of articles of the International scientific and technical conference. (8–9 November), Issue 1, chapter 2, Togliatti, edition TGUS, 2007, pp 183–189Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Safonova OY (2010) Possibilities of realization of metasubject approach at informatics lessons. New educational standards. Metasubject approach. Materials of pedagogical conference, Moscow, December 17, 2010. Accessed 25 Mar 2018
  13. 13.
    Skripkina, YV (2010) Metasubject approach in new educational standards: issues of realization. New educational standards. Metasubject approach. Materials of pedagogical conference, Moscow, December 17, 2010. Accessed 2 Mar 2018
  14. 14.
    Talyzina NF (2003) Pedagogical psychology. Academy. Academy, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tymoschuk NA (2017) Modern strategy of assessment of educational activity K.A. Kirsanov, S.V. Rykov. Scientific reflection. On materials I of the Volga region pedagogical forum “The system of continuous pedagogical education: innovative ideas, models and prospects”. Togliatti, No. 5–6 (9–0):142–146Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tymoschuk NA (2016) Innovative approach in assessment of educational activity. New strategy of assessment of educational activity: collection of conference articles “The new strategy of assessment of educational activity”. Samara, 337–342Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. A. Tymoschuk
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. N. Ryabinova
    • 1
  • O. A. Sapova
    • 2
  • V. Oddo
    • 3
  1. 1.Samara State Technical UniversitySamaraRussia
  2. 2.Samara State University of EconomicsSamaraRussia
  3. 3.University Nice Sophia-AntipolisNiceFrance

Personalised recommendations