Development of the Practice of Sharing Economy in the Communicative Information Environment of Modern Urban Communities

  • B. NikitinaEmail author
  • M. Korsun
  • I. Sarbaeva
  • V. Zvonovsky
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 908)


In the last decade, the idea of sharing economy has spread widely in the world, inspiring people with the prospects of rapid and widespread practical realization of the values of the future: social solidarity, effective use of industrial and human resources, overcoming the phenomenon of capitalist alienation in the process of social and industrial production. At the same time, not the most progressive types of practices of the share economy get success in real life. A real alternative to the implementation of the ideas of the sharing economy became so-called “Uberization” as increase in the exploitation of workers instead of selfless participation of citizens in joint activities. At the same time, the development of the information and communication environment and the multiplication of the number of Internet communities naturally entail the growth of social solidarity and the strengthening of “weak” links in a wide variety of communities. The article investigates spontaneously emerging practices of donations and exchanges, which are carried out by users of a wide variety of virtual communities, identifies specific types of sharing economy on different web platforms, and examines the differences in the communication of modern citizens involved in the sharing economy, depending on the cultural software that is installed in a particular virtual community.


Communicative information environment Digital platform for sharing practices Online community Resource efficiency Sharing economy Social solidarity Urban community 



The research conducted for this article is part of the project “Readiness of local communities to develop joint consumption and management of household waste through the development of information technologies as a strategic factor influencing the socio-economic development of Samara”, funded by Competition of fundamental research conducted in 2018 by RFBR together with the Subjects of the Russian Federation, grant number 18-411-630003.


  1. 1.
    Arcidiacono D, Gandini A, Pais I (2018) Sharing what? The ‘sharing economy’ in the sociological debate. Sociol Rev Monogr 66(2):275–288. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belk R (2010) Sharing. J Consum Res 36(5):715–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belk R (2013) You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J Bus Res 67(8):1595–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bardhi F, Eckhardt GM (2012) Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. J Consum Res 39(4):881–898. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eckhardt GM, Bardhi F (2015) The sharing economy isn’t about sharing at all. Accessed 2 Apr 2018
  6. 6.
    Hampton K, Wellman B (2003) Neighboring in Netville. City Community 2(4):277–311Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herbert M, Collin-Lachaud I (2017) Collaborative practices and consumerist habitus: an analysis of the transformative mechanisms of collaborative consumption. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) 32(1):40–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hult A, Bradley K (2017) Planning for sharing–Providing infrastructure for citizens to be makers and sharers. Plan Theory Pract 18(4):597–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inglehart R (1977) The silent revolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inglehart R, Welzel C (2005) Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: the human development sequence. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    John N (2012) Sharing and web 2.0: the emergence of a keyword. New Media Soc 15(2):167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    John N (2013) The social logics of sharing. Commun Rev 16:113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kennedy J (2018) Theorising sharing practice in relation to digital culture. Media Int Aust 168(1):108–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kennedy J, Nansen B, Meese J, Wilken R, Kohn T, Arnold M (2017) Mapping the melbourne sharing economy. Networked Society Institute Research Paper, Melb, p 5Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Loh P, Shear B (2015) Solidarity economy and community development: emerging cases in three Massachusetts cities. Community Dev 46(3):244–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manovich L (2013) Software takes command. Bloomsbury Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McLuhan M (2011) Understanding media. Understanding Media (trans. from English 3rd ed. Kuchkovo Pole). MoscowGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mezhuev VM (2007) Marks against Marxism. Cultural Revolution. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moon MJ (2017) Government-driven “sharing economy”: lessons from the seoul metropolitan government. J Dev Soc 33(2):223–243. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ritzer G (1983) The “McDonaldization” of society. J Am Cult 6(1):100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rufas A, Hine C (2018) Everyday connections between online and offline: imagining others and constructing community through local online initiatives. New Media Soc 20(10):3879–3897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wittel A (2011) Qualities of sharing and their transformations in the digital age. Int Rev Inf Ethics 15:93–98Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zvonovskiy VB (2007) Daily interindividual impersonal trust as a factor in economic activity. World Russia 16(2):133–151Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Nikitina
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Korsun
    • 2
  • I. Sarbaeva
    • 1
  • V. Zvonovsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Samara State University of EconomicsSamaraRussia
  2. 2.Samara National Research UniversitySamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations