Relation in Social Psychology: A Central Concept for the Understanding of the Human Being, Groups, and Society

  • Pedrinho A. GuareschiEmail author


I am convinced that my most important contribution, both theoretical and empirical, is based on reflections on the concept of ‘relation’ and practices drawing on it. After graduating in Philosophy, Theology, Sociology and Psychology, I remained dissatisfied with the contributions brought by these areas and sought a vision that would help me understand both Human Being and society. I found it on the elaborations of the African philosopher Augustine of Hippo. Human Being is neither an “individual”—indivisum in se sed divisum a quolibet alio”, as proposed by the individualist liberal vision, nor part of a whole, as proposed by the totalitarian view. It is person-relation, meaning ‘relation’ as ordo ad aliquid, that is, the intrinsic ordering of something towards another(s). The Human Being, the society, the objects, and the social dimension are all essentially conceived as the outcome of their relations. I have seen such a dimension in several other authors who try to account for the complexity of the world, but they have never formulated it explicitly. The notion of ‘relation’ as the core of my ontological, epistemological, ethical, and aesthetical approach to diverse matters has been fruitful in my attempts to deeply understand social phenomena.


  1. F.H. Allport, Social Psychology (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1924)Google Scholar
  2. K.O. Apel, Transformação da Filosofia 2: o a priori da comunidade de comunicação (Loyola, São Paulo, 2000)Google Scholar
  3. S. Augustinus De Trinitate. in Obras de San Agustin, ed. by S. Augustinus. Bilingual edition, Spanish and Latin, translated from Latin by Luis Arias, vol. V (Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, Madrid, 1968)Google Scholar
  4. M.F. Dos Anjos, Ética na relação entre Igreja e sociedade (Santuário, Aparecida, 1994)Google Scholar
  5. E. Durkheim, The Rules of Sociological Method (Macmillan, Basingstoke, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Dussel, Filosofia da Libertação na América Latina (Loyola, São Paulo, 1977)Google Scholar
  7. R. Farr, The Roots of Modern Social Psychology (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 1996)Google Scholar
  8. P. Freire, Extension or communication, in Education for Critical Consciousness, ed. by P. Freire (Seabury, New York, 1973)Google Scholar
  9. P. Guareschi, Sociologia da Prática Social: classe, estado e ideologia, em diálogo com Erik Wright (Vozes, Petrópolis, 1992). (Translated into English as Sociology of Social Practice: Class, State and Ideology, In Dialogue with Erik Wright. Cebu, Philippines: Justice and Peace Desk, 1994)Google Scholar
  10. P. Guareschi, Psicologia Social Crítica como prática de libertação (EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre, 2003)Google Scholar
  11. P. Guareschi, O Direito Humano à Comunicação: pela democratização da mídia (Vozes, Petrópolis, 2013)Google Scholar
  12. P. Guareschi, Sociologia Crítica: alternativas de mudança, 64th edn. (EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre, 2015). (1. original ed. 1984)Google Scholar
  13. P. Guareschi, Facing challenges: An ontological approach to the theory of social representations. Pap. Soc. Represent. 26(1), 3.1–3.14 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. P. Guareschi, D. Amon, A. Guerra (eds.), Psicologia, Comunicação e Pós-verdade (ABRAPSO, Curitiba, 2017)Google Scholar
  15. J. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vols. 1 and 2, Translated by T. McCarthy (Beacon, Boston, 1984)Google Scholar
  16. J. Herrero, Ética do Discurso, in Correntes fundamentais da ética contemporânea, ed. by M. A. Oliveira (Vozes, Petrópolis, 2000), pp. 163–194Google Scholar
  17. J. Israel, Stipulations and construction in the social sciences, in The Context of Social Psychology, ed. by J. Israel, H. Tajfel (Academic, London, 1972), pp. 123–211Google Scholar
  18. C.M. La Cugna, God for Us (HarperCollins, New York, 1993)Google Scholar
  19. K. Marx, The German ideology, in Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Psychology, ed. by M. Bottomore, M. Rubel (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964)Google Scholar
  20. G.H. Mead, in Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. by C. W. Morris (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1932)Google Scholar
  21. S. Moscovici, Society and theory in social psychology, in The Context of Social Psychology, ed. by J. Israel, H. Tajfel (Academic Press, London, 1972), pp. 17–118Google Scholar
  22. S. Moscovici, The Invention of Society: Psychological Explanations for Social Phenomena (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar
  23. S. Moscovici, Social Representations: Investigations in Social Psychology (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2000)Google Scholar
  24. S. Moscovici, Psychoanalysis, its Image and its Public, English edition prepared by G. Duveen (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2008)Google Scholar
  25. S. Moscovici, Psicologia Social das Minorias Ativas (Vozes, Petrópolis, 2011). (Written originally in English, in 1976, as Social Influence and Social Change, and published in French, in 1979, as Psychologie des Minorités Actives)Google Scholar
  26. P. Oliveira e Silva, Ordem e Ser: Ontologia da Relação em Santo Agostinho (Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 2007)Google Scholar
  27. J. Paulo II, Carta Encíclica Centesimus Annus (Paulinas, São Paulo, 1991)Google Scholar
  28. O. Pegoraro, Ética é Justiça (Vozes, Petrópolis, 1995)Google Scholar
  29. J. Thompson, Ideology and Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar
  30. G.H. Von Wright, An essay in deontic logic and the general theory of action, Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol XXI (North-Holland Pub, Amsterdam, 1968)Google Scholar
  31. J. Zizioulas, Being as Communion (Saint Vladimir’s Seminary Press, New York, 1985)Google Scholar
  32. R. Zúñiga, Actores y sujetos. Suplementos 44, 5–9 (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations