Advertisement

Starting Small: Transformation Zones and Initial Implementation

  • Rosalyn BertramEmail author
  • Suzanne Kerns
Chapter

Abstract

The period of initial implementation is a sensitive time for a new program. Its success depends upon close attention to installation stage activities and implementation drivers. To enhance efficiency and success, initial implementation should begin in a small portion of the organization, a transformation zone, where many of the common concerns discussed in this chapter can be experienced, learned from, and addressed before scaling up the new practice to include all staff. Practical challenges during initial implementation are common. In this chapter, we review several strategies to overcome such challenges including staff confidence and competence, low or inappropriate referrals, low service delivery rates, perceived clinical barriers, and other organizational challenges.

Keywords

Behavioral feedback Fidelity monitoring Knowledge transfer Implementation challenges Outcome monitoring Training environment Transformation zone 

References

  1. Beidas, R. S., Barmish, A. J., & Kendall, P. C. (2009). Training as usual: Can therapist behavior change after reading a manual and attending a brief workshop on cognitive behavioral therapy for youth anxiety? Behavior Therapist, 32(5), 97–101.Google Scholar
  2. Bertram, R. M., Blase, K. A., & Fixsen, D. L. (2015). Improving programs and outcomes: Implementation frameworks and organization change. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(4), 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2(1), 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook, J. R., Hausman, E. M., Jensen-Doss, A., & Hawley, K. M. (2017). Assessment practices of child clinicians: Results from a national survey. Assessment, 24(2), 210–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crane, R. S., Kuyken, W., Williams, J. M. G., Hastings, R. P., Cooper, L., & Fennell, M. J. (2012). Competence in teaching mindfulness-based courses: concepts, development and assessment. Mindfulness, 3(1), 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dorsey, S., Pullmann, M. D., Deblinger, E., Berliner, L., Kerns, S. E., Thompson, K., … & Garland, A. F. (2013). Improving practice in community-based settings: A randomized trial of supervision—study protocol. Implementation Science, 8(1), 89.Google Scholar
  7. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Kuklinski, M. R. (2014). Communities that care. In Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 393–408). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Julian, D. A. (2006). A community practice model for community psychologists and some examples of the application of community practice skills from the partnerships for success initiative in Ohio. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37(1–2), 21–27.Google Scholar
  9. Kerns, S. E. U., McCormick, E., Negrete, A., Carey, C., Haaland, W., & Waller, S. (2017). Predicting post-training implementation of a parenting intervention. Journal of Children’s Services, 12(4), 302–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyon, A. R., Stirman, S. W., Kerns, S. E. U., & Bruns, E. J. (2011). Developing the mental health workforce: Review and application of training approaches from multiple disciplines. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(4), 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., … & Kirchner, J. E. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science, 10(1), 21.Google Scholar
  12. Schoenwald, S. K., Sheidow, A. J., & Letourneau, E. J. (2004). Toward effective quality assurance in evidence-based practice: Links between expert consultation, therapist fidelity, and child outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(1), 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith-Boydston, J. M., Holtzman, R. J., & Roberts, M. C. (2014). Transportability of multisystemic therapy to community settings: Can a program sustain outcomes without MST services oversight? Child & Youth Care Forum, 43(5), 593–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tan, K. M. (2002). Influence of educational outreach visits on behavioral change in health professionals. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 22(2), 122–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S. (2000). Getting to outcomes: A results-based approach to accountability. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(3), 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor, School of Social WorkUniversity of Missouri–Kansas CityKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Research Associate Professor, Graduate School of Social WorkUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations