Advertisement

The Role of Audiology in Neurotology

  • Pedro Luiz Mangabeira Albernaz
  • Francisco Zuma e Maia
  • Sergio Carmona
  • Renato Valério Rodrigues Cal
  • Guillermo Zalazar
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the classical audiological dimensions – thresholds, discrimination, recruitment, and adaptation – as well as air and bone conduction tests, immittance tests, otoacoustic emissions, and electrical response audiometry. The patterns for different types of hearing loss are also presented, taking into consideration the neurotological aspects of audiological diagnosis.

Keywords

Hearing Audiological evaluation 

References

  1. 1.
    Davis H, Walsh TE. The limits of improvement of hearing following the fenestration operation. Laryngoscope. 1950;60:273–95.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shambaugh GE Jr. Pure tone and controlled speech tests in the election of cases for fenestration. Acta Otolaryngol. 1951–1952;40:199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sivian LJ, White SD. On minimal audible sound fields. J Acoust Soc Am. 1933;4:288–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bárány R. A contribution to the physiology of bone conduction. 1932. Quoted by Hirsh IJ, The measurement of hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1952.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    von Békésy G. Experiments in hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1960. p. 95–181.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zwislocki JJ. In search of the bone conduction threshold in a free sound field. J Acoust Soc Am. 1957;29:795–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fowler EP. Marked deafened areas in normal ears. 1928. Quoted by Hirsh IJ, The measurement of hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1952.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dix MR, Hallpike CS, Hood JD. Observations upon loudness recruitment phenomenon with especial reference to the differential diagnosis of disorders of the internal ear and 8th nerve. J Laryngol Otol. 1948;62:671–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jerger JF. A difference limen recruitment test and its diagnostic significance. Laryngoscope. 1952;62:1316–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jerger J, Carhart R, Lassman J. Clinical observations on excessive threshold adaptation. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1958;68(5):617–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zwislocki JJ. Acoustic measurement of the middle ear function. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1961;70:599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Terkildsen K, Scott Nielsen S. An electroacoustic impedance measuring bridge for clinical use. Arch Otolaryngol. 1960;72(3):339–46.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1960.00740010347009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Metz O. Threshold of reflex contractions of muscles of middle ear and recruitment of loudness. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1952;55:536–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;64:1386–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis H. Principles of electric response audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1976;85 Suppl 28:1–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Galambos R. Hallowell Davis: Father of the AER. In: Hirsh SK, Eldredge DH, Hirsh IJ, Silverman SR, editors. Hearing and Davis: Essays Honoring Hallowell Davis. Saint Louis, MO: Washington University; 1976.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoshie N, Oashi T. Clinical use of cochlear nerve action potential responses in man for differential diagnosis of hearing losses. Acta Otolaryngol. 1959;Suppl 252:71–87.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sohmer H, Feinmesser M. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1967;76(2):427–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aram J-M, Le Bert G. Les réponses nerveuses cochléaires chez l’homme. Image du fonctionnement de l’oreille et nouveau test d’audiometrie objective. Rev Laryng (Bordeaux). 1968;89:361–78.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmidt PH, Eggermont JJ, Odenthal DW. Study of Menière’s disease by electrocochleography. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1974;316:75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferraro JA, Tibbils RP. SP/AP area ratio in the diagnosis of Meniere’s disease. Am J Audiol. 1999;8:21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Devaiah AK, Dawson KL, Ferraro JA, Ator GA. Utility of area curve ratio electrocochleography in early Meniere’s disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(5):547–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mangabeira-Albernaz PL, Fukuda Y, Ganança MM. Menière’s disease. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1980;42:91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jewett DL, Romano MN, Williston JS. Human auditory evoked potentials: possible brain stem components detected on the scalp. Science. 1970;167(3924):1517–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hecox K, Galambos R. Brain stem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults. Arch Otolaryngol. 1974;99:30–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Starr A, Achor J. Auditory brain stem responses in neurological disease. Arch Neurol. 1975;32:761–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Selters WA, Brackmann DE. Acoustic tumor detection with brain stem electric response audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1977;103(4):181–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Don M, Kwong B, Tanaka C, Brackmann D, Nelson R. The stacked ABR: a sensitive and specific screening tool for detecting small acoustic tumors. Audiol Neurootol. 2005;10:274–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Teas DC, Eldredge DH, Davis H. Cochlear responses to acoustic transients: an interpretation of whole-nerve action potentials. J Acoust Soc Am. 1962;34:1438–59.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lins OG, Picton TW. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;96:420–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goldstein R, Rodman LB. Early components of averaged evoked responses to rapidly repeated auditory stimuli. J Speech Hear Res. 1967;10:697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brackmann DE, Don M, Selters WA. Electric response audiometry. In: England GM, editor. Otolaryngology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davis H, Yoshie N. Human evoked cortical responses to auditory stimuli. Physiologist. 1963;6:164.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    McCabe BF. Otosclerosis and vertigo. Trans Pac Coast Otoophthalmol Soc Annu Meet. 1966;47:37–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Davis H. A functional classification of auditory defects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1962;71:693–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tonndorf J. Endolymphatic hydrops: mechanical causes of hearing loss. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1976;212:293–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schuknecht H, Ishii T. Hearing loss caused by atrophy of the stria vascularis. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1966;69:1825–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kimura R, Perlman HB. Experimental obstruction of venous drainage and arterial supply of the inner ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1957;66:537–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mangabeira-Albernaz PL. Hearing loss, dizziness, and carbohydrate metabolism. Int J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;20:261–70.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1558450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brown Farrior J, Endicott JN. Congenital mixed deafness: cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea. Ablation of the aqueduct of the cochlea. Laryngoscope. 1971;81:684–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mangabeira-Albernaz PL, Hidal LBT, Iorio MCM. The perilymphatic hypertension syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol. 1992;112:306–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Minor LB, Solomon D, Zinreich J, Zee DS. Sound and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:249–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Luiz Mangabeira Albernaz
    • 1
  • Francisco Zuma e Maia
    • 2
  • Sergio Carmona
    • 3
  • Renato Valério Rodrigues Cal
    • 4
  • Guillermo Zalazar
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyAlbert Einstein Hospital São PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Otology / NeurotologyClínica MaiaCanoasBrazil
  3. 3.NeurotologyFundación San Lucas para la NeurocienciaRosárioArgentina
  4. 4.Curso de MedicinaCentro Universitário do ParáBelémBrazil
  5. 5.Department of Neurology in Hospital de San LuisFundación San Lucas para la NeurocienciaRosarioArgentina

Personalised recommendations