Advertisement

Social Processes, Urban Ecosystems, and Sustainability

  • Richard C. SmardonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to understand social science concepts and governance approaches useful for managing urban ecosystems sustainably. Basic social science concepts, urban ecosystems/social science terminology, theoretical models, and applied social science research will be reviewed with this perspective. Environmental services derived from green space and green infrastructure will be a strong subtheme in regard to its quality of life and human health benefits. Social science models and constructs with high potential for applicability to sustainability planning will be featured through several case studies.

Keywords

Urban social science Urban ecosystems Social benefits Decision-making 

Supplementary material

458872_1_En_3_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Field_Exercise_3_RiskPerception (DOCX 19 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Campbell S (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J Am Plan Assoc 62(3):297–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Forrester J (1989) Planning in the face of power. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smardon RC (2008) A comparison of local agenda 21 implementation in North America, European and Indian cities. Manag Environ Qual 19(1):118–137.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830810840408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spirn AW (1984) The granite garden: urban nature and human design. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swanwick C, Dunnett N, Wooley H (2003) Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: an overview. Built Environ 29(2):94–106.  https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.29.2.94.54467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harvey D (1975) Social justice and the city. John Hopkins Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harvey D (1989) The urban experience. Johns Hopkins Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hayden D (1997) The power of place: urban landscapes as public history. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neimela J (1999) Is there a theory of urban ecology? Urban Ecosyst 3:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park RE, Burgess E (eds) (1925) The city. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harrison C, Burgess J (2003) Social science concepts and framework for understanding urban ecosystems. In: Berkowitz AB, Nilon CH, Hollweg S (eds) Understanding urban ecosystems: a new frontier for science education. Springer, New York, pp 137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Macintyre S, Maciver S, Sooman A (1993) Area, class and health: should we be focusing on place or people? J Soc Policy 22(2):213–234.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727900019310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanders P (1986) Social theory and the urban question. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stokols D (1995) Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot 10(4):282–298.  https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gobster PH (2004) Human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Land Urban Plann 68:147–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00162-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW (1991) Restorative effects of natural environmental experiences. Environ Behav 23:3–26.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Korpela KM, Hartig T, Kaiser F, Fuhrer U (2001) Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environ Behav 33:572–589.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuo EF (2001) Coping with poverty: impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environ Behav 33:5–34.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121972846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wells NW (2000) At home with nature: effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environ Behav 32:775–795.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alonso W (1964) The historic and the structural theories of urban form: their implications for urban renewal. Land Econ 40(2):227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cronon W (1991) Natures metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fraser EDG, Kenny WA (2000) Cultural background and landscape history as factors affecting perceptions of the urban forest. J Arboric 26(2):106–113Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Worster D (1977) Nature’s economy: a history of ecological ideas. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haig RM (1926) Toward an understanding of the metropolis. Q J Econ 40(3):402–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giddens A, Lash S (1994) Reflexive modernization. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wynne B (1994) Scientific knowledge and the global environment. In: Benton T, Redcliff M (eds) Social theory and the global environment. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liverman DE, Moran F, Rindfuss RR, Stern PC (1998) People and pixels, linking remote sensing and social science. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krausmann F, Haberl H, Schulz NB, Erb K-H, Darge E, Gaube V (2003) Land use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria. Part1: driving forces of land use change 1950-1995. Land Use Policy 20(1):21–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00049-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Beck GM, Liem KS, Simpson GG (1991) Life: an introduction to biology. James Curry, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ayres RU, Simonis UE (1994) Industrial metabolism: restructuring for sustainable development. United Nations University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fischer-Kowalski M (1998) Society’s metabolism: the intellectual history of material flow analysis. Part 1: 1860-1970. J Ind Ecol 2(1):61–78.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ayres RU (2001) The minimum complexity of endogenous growth models: the role of physical resource flows. Energy 26(9):817–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ibenholt K (2002) Material flow accounting and economic modeling. In: Ayres RU, Ayres LW (eds) A handbook of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 177–184Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jannssen AM (2004) Agent based models. In: Proops J, Safonov P (eds) Modeling in ecological economics. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 155–172Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Alberti M (2005) The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. Int Reg Sci Rev 28:168–192.  https://doi.org/10.1177/01600176052755160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Decker EH, Elliott S, Smith FA, Blake DR, Rowland FS (2000) Energy and material flow through the urban ecosystem. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:685–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Millennium Assessment (2003) Ecosystem and human well-being: a framework for assessment, Millennium ecosystem assessment series. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Costanza R (1992) Towards an operational definition of health. In: Costanza R, Norton B, Haskel BD (eds) Ecosystem health-new goods for ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 239–256Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rapport DJ, Costanza R, McMichad AJ (1998) Assessing ecosystem health. Trends Ecol Evol 13(10):397–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification and evaluation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kazmierczak A, Niemela J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Land Urban Plann 81:167–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Redman CL, Grove J, Lubey LH (2004) Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research network: social dimensions. Ecosystems 7(2):161–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Haberl H, Winiwarter V, Andersson K, Ayres RU, Boone C, Castillo A, Cunfer G, Fisher-Kowalski M, Freudenburg WR, Furman E, Kaufman R, Krasman F, Langthaler E, Lotze-Campen H, Mirtl M, Redman GL, Reenberg A, Wardell A, Warr B, Zechmiester H (2006) From LTER to LTSER: conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of the long-term sociological research. Ecol Soc 11(2):13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Grove JM, Hinson KE, Northrop JR (2003) A social ecology approach to understanding urban ecosystems and landscapes. In: Berkowitz AB, Nilon CH, Hollweg S (eds) Understanding urban ecosystems: a new frontier for science education. Springer, New York, pp 167–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pickett STA, Burch WR Jr, Dalton S, Foresman T, Grove J, Rowntree R (1977) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst 1:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2002) The ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: meaning, model and metaphor. Ecosystems 5(1):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0051-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2006) Advancing urban ecological studies: frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem study. Austral Ecol 31(2):114–125.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j/1442-9993.2006.01586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM (2004) Resilient cities: meaning, models and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic and planning realms. Land Urban Plann 69:369–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Grimm JM, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long terms studies of urban ecological systems: urban ecological systems present multiple challenges to ecologists-pervasive human impact and extreme heterogeneity of cities, and the need to integrate social and ecological approaches, concepts and theory. Bioscience 50:571–584.  https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Freeman H (ed) (1984) Mental health and the environment. Churchill Livingstone, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Henwood K (2002) Issues in health development; environment and health: is there a role for environmental and countryside agencies in promoting benefits to health? Health Development Agency, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    World Health Organization (WHO) (1998) City health profiles: a review of progress. World Health Organization Regional Office for EuropeGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Paton K, Senguta S, Hassan L (2005) Settings, systems and organization development: the healthy living and working model. Health Promot Int 20(1):81–89.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dah510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cairns JJ, Pratt JR (1995) The relationship between ecosystem health and delivery of ecosystem services. In: Costanza R, Norton B, Haskel BD (eds) Ecosystem health-new goods for ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 140–250Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Van Kamp I, Leidelmeijer K, Marsman K, De Hollander A (2003) Urban environmental quality and human well being: towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: a literature review. Land Urban Plann 65:5–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00232-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Circerchia A (1996) Indicators for the measurement of the quality of urban life: what is the appropriate territorial dimension? Soc Indic Res 39:321–335.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Floyd MF, Gramman JH, Saenz R (1993) Ethnic factors and the use of public recreation areas: the case of Mexican-Americans. Leis Sci 15:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Heynen M (2006) Green urban park ecology: toward a better understanding of inner-city environmental change. Environ Plan A 38:499–516.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a37365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kuo FE, Sullivan WC, Coley RL, Brunson L (1998) Fertile ground for community: inner city neighborhood spaces. Am J Commun Psychol 26(6):823–851.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022294028903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Turner T (2002) Justice on earth. Chelsea Green, White River JunctionGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kellert R, Wilson EO (eds) (1993) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Takano T, Nakamura K, Wetanabe M (2002) Urban residential environments and senior citizens longevity in mega-city areas – the importance of walkable green space. J Epidemiol Community Health 56(12):913–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tanaka A, Takano T, Nakamura K, Takeuchi S (1996) Health levels influenced by urban residential conditions in a megacity – Tokyo. Urban Stud 33:879–894.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989650011645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    De Vries S, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuweberg P (2003) Natural environments-healthy environments? Environ Plan 35:1717–1731.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a3511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Payne L, Orsega-Smith B, Godbey G, Roy M (1998) Local parks and the health of older adults: results from an exploratory study. Parks Recreat 33(10):64–70Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ulrich RS (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420–421.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Faber-Taylor A, Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2001) Coping with ADD: the surprising connection to green settings. Environ Behav 33:54–77.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121972864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2001) Aggression and violence in the inner city: effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environ Behav 33:543–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Korpela KM (1989) Place identity as a product of environmental self-regulation. J Environ Psychol 9(3):241–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80038-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Korpela KM (2003) Negative mood of adult place preference. Environ Behav 35(3):331–346.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503035003002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Korpela KM, Hartig T (1996) Restorative qualities of favorite places. J Environ Psychol 16(3):221–233.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Newell PB (1997) A cross-cultural examination of favorite places. Environ Behav 29:495–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Stokols D, Grywacz JG, McMahon S, Philips K (2003) Increasing the health promotive capacity of human environments. Am J Health Promot 18(1):4–13.  https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Palmer JF (1988) Neighborhoods as stands in the urban forest. Urban Ecol 8(3):229–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4009(84)90037-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Smardon RC (1988) Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: the role of vegetation. Land Urban Plan 16(1-2):85–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(88)90018-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Westphal LM (2003) Social aspects of urban forestry: urban greening and social benefits: a study of empowerment outcomes. J Arboric 29(3):137–147Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Kuo FE, Bacaicoa M, Sullivan WC (1998) Transforming inner city landscapes: trees, sense of safety and preference. Environ Behav 30(1):28–59.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916598301002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bixler RD, Floyd MF (1997) Nature is scary, disgusting and uncomfortable. Environ Behav 29:443–467.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659702900401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Patz JA, Norris DE (2004) Land use change and human health. Ecosyst Land Use Change 153:159–167.  https://doi.org/10.1029/153GM13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Zielinski-Gutierrez EC, Hayden MH (2006) A model for defining West Nile virus risk perception based on ecology and proximity. EcoHealth 3:28–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-005-0001-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    St Leger L (2003) Health and nature—new challenges for health promotion. Health Promot Int 18:173–175.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dag012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Kim J, Kaplan R (2004) Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: new urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environ Behav 36(3):313–340.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503260236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Horwitz P, Lindsey M, O’Conner M (2001) Biodiversity, endemism, sense of place, and public health: inter-relationships for Australian inland aquatic systems. Ecosyst Health 7(4):253–265.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-0992.2001.01044.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wilson EO (2001) Nature matters. Am J Prev Med 20(3):241–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3739(00)00318-4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Burgess J, Harrison CM, Limb M (1988) People, parks and urban green: a study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Stud 25(6):455–473.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00420988820080631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    O’Brien L, Tabbush P (2005) Accessibility of woodland and natural spaces. Addressing crime and safety issues. Social Research Group of Forest Research, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ward Thompson C, Aspinall P, Bell S, Findlay C, Wherret J, Travlou P (2004) Open space and social inclusion: local woodland use in central Scotland. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Carr S, Francis M, Rivlin LG, Stone M (1992) Public space. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Gehl J (1987) Life between buildings: using public space. Van Nostrand Rhinehold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Greenbaum SD (1982) Bridging ties at the neighborhood level. Soc Networks 4(4):367–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(82)90019-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Gobster PH (2002) Managing parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele. Leis Sci 24:143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Gomez E (2002) The ethnicity and public recreation participation model. Leis Sci 24:123–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Ho C, Sasidharan V, Elmendorf W, Willits FK, Grafe A, Godbey G (2005) Gender and ethnic variations in urban park preferences, visitation and perceived benefits. J Leis Res 37(3):281–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Smardon RC (2009) Urban park sustainability in an Asian context. Int J Appl Environ Sci 4(2):193–202Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Gobster PH (1998) Urban parks as green walls or green magnets? Interracial relations in neighborhood boundary parks. Land Urban Plann 41:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kweon B, Sullivan WC, Wiley AR (1998) Green common spaces and the social integration of inner city older adults. Environ Behav 30(6):832–858.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Rodgers R (1999) Towards an urban renaissance. Urban task force. DRTR, LondonGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Andersson E (2006) Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Energy Soc 11(1):34Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Andersson E, Barthel S, Ahrne K (2007) Measuring socio-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecol Appl 17(5):1267–1278.  https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1116.1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Rees WE (1993) Urban ecosystems: the human dimension. Urban Ecosyst 1(1):63–75.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10143801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriate carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4:121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789200400212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Grove JM, Troy AR, O’Neil-Dunne JPM, Burch WR, Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2006) Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems 9:578–597.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-0116-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Dow K (2000) Social dimensions of gradients in urban ecosystems. Urban Ecosyst 4(4):255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Sergeldin I (1995) The human face of the urban environment. In: Serageldin I, Cohen MA, Sivaramakrishnan KC (eds) The human face of the urban environment, proceedings of the second annual world bank conference on environmentally sustainable development. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 16–20Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Lee S-W, Ellis CD, Kweon B-S, Hong S-K (2008) Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas. Land Urban Plann 85:60–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Stern PC (2000) Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56(3):407–424.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Levy JS (2003) Applications of prospect theory to political science. Synthese 135(2):215–241.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023413007698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Barnhill K, Smardon R (2012) Gaining ground: green infrastructure attitudes and perceptions from stakeholders in Syracuse, New York. Environ Pract 14(1):6–16.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046611000470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Baptiste AK, Foley C, Smardon R (2015) Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: a case study of Syracuse, NY. Land Urban Plann 136:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Ernston H, Sorlin S, Elemquist T (2008) Social movements and ecosystem service—the role of social network structure in protecting and management urban green areas in Stockholm. Energy Soc 13(2):39Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Ernston H, Sorlin S (2009) Weaving protective stories: connective practices to articulate holistic values in the Stockholm National Urban Park. Environ Plan A 41(6):1460–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Housing Settlement Management Institute (HSMI)/Waste management Collection (WMC) (1996) Citywide best management practices in solid waste management in collection, transportation and disposal. In: Singh BN, Maitia S, Sharman P (eds) Urban environmental management – the Indian experience. Housing Settlement Management Institute/Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies, New Delhi/RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Rao KR (2000) Clean and green cities: participation of communities/neighborhood committees. Shelter 3(1):50–53Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Anand PB (1999) Waste management in Madras revisited. Environ Urban 11(2):161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Cheril K (1994) Haul you own garbage. Down Earth 3(8):10Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Malik I (1998) Waste management in Delhi. Shelter 1(4):59–60Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Smardon RC, Moran S, Baptiste AK (2018) Revitalizing urban waterway communities: streams of environmental justice. Earthscan/Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental StudiesSUNY College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations