Advertisement

The Biological System—Urban Wildlife, Adaptation, and Evolution: Urbanization as a Driver of Contemporary Evolution in Gray Squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis)

  • James P. GibbsEmail author
  • Matthew F. Buff
  • Bradley J. Cosentino
Chapter

Abstract

Urbanization dramatically reduces levels of regional biodiversity, yet urban environments can serve as refuges for biodiversity because some biological stressors are more prevalent outside cities than inside. We evaluated whether urbanization can promote rare genotypes, focusing on gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), which have genetically based color morphs visible to the naked eye. Combining data on 6681 occurrences of gray squirrels derived from an Internet-based, participatory research program (SquirrelMapper) and mined from an online image sharing platform (Flickr), we found the probability of the black morph increases with the extent of urban land cover. An internet-based game that crowdsourced search times of humans to find gray squirrels revealed a distinct camouflage advantage of gray morphs over black in early successional forests where hunting occurs but not in urban areas where hunting is prohibited. The black morph was strongly underrepresented (9%) within a sample of road-killed squirrels in contrast to its frequency (33%) among live squirrels in the same area, likely due to the black morph’s greater conspicuousness on pavement, which in turn facilitates driver avoidance and thereby favors the black morph in cities where vehicles are the primary source of squirrel mortality. Together these processes can generate remarkably steep phenotypic clines along urbanization gradients and will likely continue to shape morphological evolution of the species given that hunting pressures are declining throughout the species’ range while road traffic intensifies. This study suggests cities can serve as refuges for rare genotypes by neutralizing selective pressures that favor a widespread morph in the rural landscape while creating novel selective pressures against the widespread morph within urban areas.

Keywords

Biodiversity Citizen science Contemporary evolution Crowdsourcing Geographical cline Gray squirrel 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by a National Science Foundation ULTRA-Ex grant: “Positioning Rust-Belt Cities for a Sustainable Future: A Systems Approach to Enhancing Urban Quality of Life.” Elizabeth Hunter and Sam Quinn provided technical support. Ben Zuckerberg, Myrna Hall, Dave Nowak, Eric Gustafson, and Rick Beal were instrumental in their encouragement of the project. The data presented here are the product of the aggregate efforts of a cadre of interested students at SUNY-ESF and within the Syracuse City School District as well as members of the wider public who mapped squirrels and played “Squirrel Hunt.” Rosa Joyal, in particular, collaborated on many squirrel counts.

Supplementary material

458872_1_En_12_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Field_Exercise_10_Urban Wildlife (DOCX 22 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    UN (United Nations) (2011) World population prospects: the 2010 revision. United Nations, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fischer LK, Honold J, Cvejić R, Delshammar T, Hilbert S, Lafortezza R, Nastran M et al (2018) Beyond green: broad support for biodiversity in multicultural European cities. Global Environ Chang 49:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aronson MF, Lepczyk CA, Evans KL, Goddard MA, Lerman SB, MacIvor JS et al (2017) Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front Ecol Environ 15:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collins JP, Kinzig A, Grimm NB, Fagan WF, Hope D, Wu JG, Borer ET (2000) A new urban ecology. Am Sci 88:416–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luther D, Baptista L (2010) Urban noise and the cultural evolution of bird songs. Proc R Soc B 277:469–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin LJ, Blossey B, Ellis E (2012) Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations. Front Ecol Environ 10:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allendorf FW, Hard JJ (2009) Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:9987–9994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D (2006) From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:186–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wandeler P, Funk SM, Largiader CR, Gloor S, Breitenmoser U (2003) The city-fox phenomenon: genetic consequences of a recent colonization of urban habitat. Mol Ecol 12:647–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Watts PC, Rouquette JR, Saccheri IJ, Kemp SJ, Thompson DJ (2004) Molecular and ecological evidence for small-scale isolation by distance in an endangered damselfly, Coenagrion mercurial. Mol Ecol 13:2931–2945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yeh PJ et al (2004) Rapid evolution of a sexually selected trait following population establishment in a novel habitat. Evolution 58:166–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Partecke J, Gwinner E (2007) Increased sedentariness in European blackbirds following urbanization: a consequence of local adaptation? Ecology 88:882–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cheptou PO, Carrue O, Rouifed S, Cantarel A (2008) Rapid evolution of seed dispersal in an urban environment in the weed Crepis sancta. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:3796–3799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    National Human Genome Research Institute (2015) Fact sheets: transcriptome. National Institute of Health. https://www.genome.gov/13014330/transcriptome-fact-sheet/. Accessed 12 April 2019
  17. 17.
    Whitehead A, Triant DA, Champlin D, Nacci D (2010) Comparative transcriptomics implicates mechanisms of evolved pollution tolerance in a killifish population. Mol Ecol 19:5186–5203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steele M, Koprowski JL (2001) North American tree squirrels. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McRobie H, Thomas A, Kelly J (2009) The genetic basis of melanin in the gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). J Hered 100:709–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robertson GI (1973) Distribution of color morphs of Sciurus carolinensis in eastern North America. Unpubl. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Western Ontario, London. 78 pGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schorger AW (1949) Squirrels in early Wisconsin. Trans Wis Acad Sci Arts Lett 39:195–247Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ducharme MB, Larochelle J, Richard D (1989) Thermogenic capacity in gray and black morphs of the gray squirrel, Sciurus carolinensis. Physiol Zool 62:1273–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tomsa TN (1987) An investigation of the factors influencing the frequency and distribution of melanistic gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis). M. S. Thesis, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SyracuseGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alessi MG, Campbell LK, Miller CA (2011). Results of the 2010–2011 Illinois hunter harvest survey. Federal aid project W-112-R-20 Retrieved Dec. 30 2012 from http://www.inhs.uiuc.edu/programs/hd/Harvest%20Reports/Hunter%20Harvest/HH1011RepFinal.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2016
  25. 25.
    Davis MD (1996) Extent and location. In: Davis MB (ed) Eastern old-growth forests: prospects for rediscovery and recovery. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 18–32Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Creed W, Sharp W (1958) Melanistic squirrels in Cameron County, Pennsylvania. J Mammal 39:532–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McCleery RA, Lopez RR, Silvy NJ, Gallant DL (2008) Fox squirrel survival in urban and rural environments. J Wildl Manag 72:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McCleery RA (2009) Changes in fox squirrel anti-predator behaviors across the urban–rural gradient. Landsc Ecol 24:483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gustafson E, VanDruff L (1990) Behavior of black and gray morphs of Sciurus carolinensis in an urban environment. Am Midl Nat 123(1):186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ashley EP, Kosloskib A, Petriec SA (2007) Incidence of intentional vehicle–reptile collisions. Hum Dimens Wildl 12:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R (2007) Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc 12(2):11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art11/. Accessed 15 May 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Berkowitz AR, Nilon CH, Hollweg K (eds) (2003) Understanding urban ecosystems: a new frontier for science and education. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnson MTJ, Munshi-South J (2017) Evolution of life in urban environments. Science 358(6363):eaam8327.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Homer CG, Huang C, Yang L, Wylie B, Coan M (2004) Development of a 2001 national landcover database for the United States. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 7:829–840.  https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.70.7.829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Commission for Environmental Cooperation. (2013) 2010 land cover of North America at 250 meters. http://www.cec.org/tools-and-resources/map-files/land-cover-2010. Accessed 22 Nov 2018
  36. 36.
    Commission for Environmental Cooperation. (2007) North American elevation 1-kilometer resolution. http://www.cec.org/tools-and-resources/map-files/elevation-2007. Accessed 22 Nov 2018
  37. 37.
    Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2014) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 dataset. Int J Climatol 34:623–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holst KK, Budtz-Jørgensen E (2012) Linear latent variable models: the lava package. Comput Stat 28:1385–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 22 Nov 2018
  40. 40.
    Holst KK (2012) lava.tobit: LVM with censored and binary outcomes. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lava.tobit. Accessed 22 Nov 2018
  41. 41.
    Toet A, Bijl P, Valeton JM (2000) Visual conspicuity determines human target acquisition performance. Opt Eng 37:1969–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kiltie RW (1992) Camouflage comparisons among fox squirrels from the Mississippi River Delta. J Mammal 73:906–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, West SussexCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bonney R (2004) Understanding the process of research. In: Chittenden D, Farmelo G, Lewenstein B (eds) Creating connections: museums and public understanding of current research. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, pp 199–201Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter D (2010) Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:149–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mullen LM, Hoekstra HE (2008) Natural selection along an environmental gradient: a classic cline in mouse pigmentation. Evolution 7:1555–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hungerford KE, Wilder NG (1941) Observations on the homing behavior of the gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). J Wildl Manag 5:458–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edn. Longman Harlow, Essex, p 438Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mullen LM, Vignieri SN, Gore JA, Hoekstra HE (2009) Adaptive basis of geographic variation: genetic, phenotypic and environmental differences among beach mouse populations. Proc Biol Sci 276:3809–3818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Szymura JM, Barton NH (1986) Genetic analysis of a hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads, Bombina bombina and B. variegata, near Cracow in southern Poland. Evolution 40:1141–1159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Thorington RW, Ferrell K (2006) Squirrels: the animal answer guide. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, p 208Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Parker TS, Nilon CH (2008) Gray squirrel density, habitat suitability, and behavior in urban parks. Urban Ecosyst 11:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zipperer WC, Burgess RL, Nyland RD (1990) Patterns of deforestation and reforestation in different landscape types in central New York. For Ecol Manag 36:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Oke TR (1982) The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 108:1–24Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Warren PS, Madhusudan K, Ermann M, Brazel A (2006) Urban bioacoustics: it’s not just noise. Anim Behav 71:491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Partan S, Fulmer AG, Gounard MA, Redmond JE (2010) Multimodal alarm behavior in urban and rural gray squirrels studied by means of observation and a mechanical robot. Curr Zool 56:313–326Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2007) 2006 national survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. USFWS, Washington DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • James P. Gibbs
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthew F. Buff
    • 2
  • Bradley J. Cosentino
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental and Forest BiologyState University of New York College of Environmental Science and ForestrySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.New York Natural Heritage ProgramState University of New York College of Environmental Science and ForestryAlbanyUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyHobart & William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations