Advertisement

Material Cycles

  • Brandon K. WinfreyEmail author
  • Patrick Kangas
Chapter

Abstract

Material cycles in urban systems are strongly influenced by human-driven activities. Similar to ecosystems, which form via production processes that use material and energy as inputs, urban areas require materials for industrial production. By coupling processes of constructive production and regenerative breakdown, materials can be cycled sustainably in cities. Waste materials are generated when no more utility can be derived from that material. In urban areas, recycling materials plays an important role in maximizing the amount of utility that can be derived from materials flowing into the city, which is evidenced by the increasing trend of recycling certain materials in solid municipal waste management and electronic components.

Keywords

Solid waste Recycling Urban metabolism Industrial ecology Emergy 

Supplementary material

458872_1_En_10_MOESM1_ESM.docx (57 kb)
Field_Exercise_8_Tracing Solid Waste (DOCX 58 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Odum HT (1994) Ecological and general systems: an introduction to systems ecology. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, p 644Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Redfield AC (1934) On the proportions of organic derivatives in sea water and their relation to the composition of plankton. In: James Johnstone memorial volume. University of Liverpool Press, Liverpool, pp 176–192Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Redfield AC (1958) The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci 46:205–222Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Redfield AC, Ketchum BH, Richards FA (1963) The influence of organisms on the composition of sea water. In: Hill MN et al (eds) The sea, vol 2. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 26–77Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martin JH, Coale KH, Johnson KS, Fitwater SE, Gordon RM, Tanner SJ et al (1994) Testing the iron hypothesis in ecosystems of the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Nature 371:123–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Browne D, O’Regan B, Moles R (2011) Material flow accounting for an Irish city-region 1992-2002. J Clean Prod 19(9–10):967–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blaszczyk RL (2009) American consumer society, 1865–2005. Harlan Davidson, WheelingGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leonard A (2010) The story of stuff. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Volk T (2003) Natural selection, Gaia, and inadvertent by-products. Climate Change 58:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Volk T (2004) Gaia is life in a wasteworld of by-products. In: Schneider SH, Miller JR, Crist E, Boston PJ (eds) Scientists debate Gaia. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 27–36Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Volk T (2010) How the biosphere works. In: Crist E, Rinker HB (eds) Gaia in turmoil. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 27–40Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Odum H (1995) Self-organization and maximum empower. In: Hall CAS (ed) Maximum power: the ideas and applications of H.T. Odum. Colorado University Press, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benyus J (1997) Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature. William Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Graedel TE, Allenby BR (2003) Industrial ecology, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 363Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Niza S, Rosado L, Ferrao P (2009) Urban metabolism, methodological advances in urban material flow accounting based on the Lisbon case study. J Ind Ecol 13(3):384–405.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00130.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kennedy C, Hoorweg D (2012) Mainstreaming urban metabolism. J Ind Ecol 16:780–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wolman A (1965) The metabolism of cities. Sci Am 213:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zucchetto J (1975) Energy-economic theory and mathematical models for combining the systems of man and nature, case study: the urban region of Miami, Florida. Ecol Model 1:241–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeMille J (1947) Strategic minerals. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cameron EN (1986) At the crossroads, the mineral problems of the United States. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kesler SE (1994) Mineral resources, economics and the environment. MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anonymous (1921) Waste in industry. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alter H, Horowitz E (eds) (1975) Resource recovery and utilization. American Society for Testing and Materials, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Allen DT, Behmanesh N (1994) Wastes as raw material. In: The greening of industrial ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 69–89Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baumann H, Tillman AM (2004) The Hitch Hiker’s guide to LCA. Studentlitteratur AB, LundGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Graedel TE, Allenby BR (1998) Industrial ecology and the automobile. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Cradle to cradle. North Point Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hickman HL Jr (1999) Principles of integrated solid waste management. American Academy of Environmental Engineers, AnnapolisGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2016) Advancing sustainable materials management: 2014 fact sheet: assessing trends in material generation, recycling, composting, combustion with energy recovery and landfilling in the United States. Office of Land and Emergency Management, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bohm RA, Folz DH, Kinnaman TC, Podolsky MJ (2010) The costs of municipal waste and recycling programs. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:864–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tammemagi H (1999) The waste crisis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Odum H (1996) Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Odum HT (2007) Environment, power, and society for the twenty-first century: the hierarchy of energy. Columbia University Press, New York, xiv, 418ppGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brown M, Buranakarn V (2003) Emergy indices and ratios for sustainable material cycles and recycle options. Resour Conserv Recycl 38:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brown M (2005) Areal empower density, unit emergy values, and emformation, 3rd biennial Emergy research conference proceedings. University of Florida, Gainesville, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arias ME, Brown MT (2009) Feasibility of using constructed treatment wetlands for municipal wastewater treatment in the Bogota Savannah, Colombia. Ecol Eng 35(7):1070–1078.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Winfrey BK, Tilley DR (2016) An emergy-based treatment sustainability index for evaluating waste treatment systems. J Clean Prod 112:4485–4496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grossman E (2006) High tech trash. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science and TechnologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations