Advertisement

A Qualitative Analysis of an E-education Initiative in Deep Rural Schools in South Africa: A Need to Build Resilience

  • Sifiso DlaminiEmail author
  • Abraham van der Vyver
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 933)

Abstract

The Information Communication and Technology for Rural Education Development (ICT4RED) initiative in South Africa which was aimed at the introduction of ICTs into schools in disadvantaged communities, was coordinated by a government agency (the Meraka Institute). The initiative was supported by a number of government stakeholders, namely the Department of Science and Technology, the Department of Basic Education, the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform, and the Provincial Department of Education. Often, ICT4E projects fail once the implementation team and the funder withdraw, especially in rural schools where the only technological resources available at the school are those provided through the project or intervention. Although there are multiple reasons for this, the problem often lies with integration of the project into the day-to-day institutional arrangements of the education system. This puts pressure on the school environment, especially the teacher – who often receives little support from the District and Provincial departments. The researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with eleven teachers from five project schools that were selected for an evaluation at the time, in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. Findings on the paper were generated by way of content analysis. The content of the interviews was finally analysed with Heeks’s Resilience Assessment Benchmarking and Impact Toolkit (RABIT). The research showed that these schools are unable to sustain the change introduced, without support from their formal support system; therefore, this indicates that schools are required to be more resilient, in order to develop capacity to absorb the intervention, and to successfully implement it at the school level.

Keywords

ICT4E Resilience Sustainability Implementation 

References

  1. 1.
    Haddad, W.D. http://www.ictinedtoolkit.org/usere/pdfs/. Accessed 15 Oct 2017
  2. 2.
    Evoh, C.J.: The adoption and sustainability of technology-enhanced education in higher institutions of learning in Africa. Technol. Sustain. Rural Dev. Africa 2(2), 19–39 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herselman, M., Botha, A.: Designing and implementing an Information Communication Technology for Rural Education Development (ICT4RED) in a Resource Constrained Environment: Cofimvaba School District, Eastern Cape, South Africa. CSIR, Pretoria (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wengraf, T.: Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kothari, C.R.: Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Age, Delhi (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heeks, R., Ospina, A.V.: Analysing urban community informatics from a resilience perspective. J. Community Inform. 11(1) (2014). http://ci-journal.org/index.php/ciej/article/view/1108
  7. 7.
    Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., ten Brummelhuis, A.: Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A call to action. Educ. Info. Technol. 3(20), 641–654 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Evoh, C.J.: Emerging trajectories and sustainability of ICTs in educational reforms in Africa: exploring the prospects of the teacher laptop policy in South Africa. J. Educ. Int. Dev. 2(4), 21–31 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J.: Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented in the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association New York City, 24–28 March (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christensen, R., Knezek, G.: Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G. (eds.) International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 397–417 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Azadeh, A., Salehi, V., Salehi, R.: A resilience-based model for performance evaluation of information systems: the case of a gas company. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 11(9), 1337–1351 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heeks, R.: RABIT: A New Toolkit for Measuring Resilience. Nexus for ICTs, climate change and Development. https://niccd.wordpress.com/2016/11/14/rabit-a-new-toolkit-for-measuring-resilience/. Accessed 04 Jan 2017
  14. 14.
    Norris, F.H., Stevens, S.P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K.F., Pfefferbaum, R.L.: Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities and strategy for disaster readiness. Am. J. Community Psychol. 4(1), 127–150 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonnano, G.: Loss, trauma, and human resilience. Am. Psychol. 59(1), 20–28 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heeks, R., Ospina, A.V.: Conceptualising the link between information systems and resilience: a developing country field study. Inf. Syst. J. 1(1), 1–27 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janssen, M.A., Anderies, J.M.: Robustness trade-offs in social-ecological systems. Int. J. Commons 1(1), 43–65 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J.M., Abel, N.: From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8), 765–781 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Folke, C., Carpenter, R.S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., Rockström, J.: Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol. Soc. 15(4), 20 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Folke, C.: Freshwater as shared between society and ecosystems: from divided approaches to integrated challenges. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 358(1440), 2037–2049 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rockefeller Foundation: Building Climate Change Resilience. http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/uploads/files/c9725eb2-b76e-42eb-82db-c5672a43a097-climate.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2017
  22. 22.
    Veryard, R.: Technology Change Management. http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardveryard. Accessed 12 June 2017
  23. 23.
    Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, T., Norberg, P.: Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30(1), 441–473 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Biggs, W.: TIM lecture series - 29 lessons learned in entrepreneurship. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2(11), 46–48 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Folke, C.: Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob. Environ. Change 16(1), 253–267 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Magis, K., Shinn, C.: Emergent principles of social sustainability. In: Dillard, J., Dujon, V., King, M. (eds.) Understanding the Social Dimension of Sustainability, pp. 15–44. Routledge, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIR Meraka InstitutePretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Monash South AfricaRoodepoortSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations