UniVibe: A Novel User-Friendly Software for Automated Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics of Geared Transmission

  • Gianluca D’EliaEmail author
  • Irene Daini
  • Luigi Romagnoli
  • Emiliano Mucchi
Conference paper
Part of the Applied Condition Monitoring book series (ACM, volume 15)


Nowadays, huge emphasis is given to research on diagnostic tools in order to prevent and monitor the health status of gears and bearings. However, the link between advanced signal processing techniques and ease of use is still missing in commercial software tools. Actually, softwares that implement advanced signal processing techniques leak in ease user interaction and automated diagnostic procedures. Authors have developed a commercial software tool, called UniVibe, that attempts to fill the gap between high sensitivity in the diagnostics of faults in complex geared transmission and user-friendly interface. This work focuses on the description of the UniVibe core, highlighting its diagnostic capabilities on the basis of a real industrial case. Specifically, the automated procedure that shepherds the user to the successfully fault diagnosis of a complex geared transmission is pointed out.


Diagnostic systems Geared transmission Software Signal processing 


  1. 1.
    Lebold M, McClintic K, Campbell R, Byington C, Maynard K (2000) Review of vibration analysis methods for gearbox diagnostics and prognostics. In: Proceedings of the 54th meeting of the society for machinery failure prevention technology, Virginia Beach, VA, pp 623–634, 1–4 May 2000Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buzzoni M, Mucchi E, D’Elia G, Dalpiaz G (2017) Diagnosis of localized faults in multistage gearboxes: a vibrational approach by means of automatic EMD-based algorithm. Shock Vibr 2017:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D’Elia G, Mucchi E, Cocconcelli M (2017) On the identification of the angular position of gears for the diagnostics of planetary gearboxes. Mech Syst Sig Process 83:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Assaad B, Eltabach M, Antoni J (2014) Vibration based condition monitoring of a multistage epicyclic gearbox in lifting cranes. Mech Syst Sig Process 42:351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sharma V, Parey A (2016) A review of gear fault diagnosis using various condition indicators. Procedia Eng 144:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fyfe KR, Munck EDS (1997) Analysis of computed order tracking. Mech Syst Sig Process 11:187–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Randall RB (2017) A history of cepstrum analysis and its application to mechanical problems. Mech Syst Sig Process 97:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Welch PD (1967) The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust AU–15:70–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McFadden PD, Smith JD (1984) Vibration monitoring of rolling element bearings by the high-frequency resonance technique - a review. Tribol Int 17:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Braun S (2011) The synchronous (time domain) average revisited. Mech Syst Sig Process 25:1087–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Forrester D (1998) A method for the separation of epicyclic planet gear vibration signatures. Acoustical and Vibratory Surveillance Methods and Diagnostic Techniques, Senlis, France, October 1998Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Antoni J (2009) Cyclostationarity by examples. Mech Syst Sig Process 23:987–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McFadden PD (1991) A technique for calculating the time domain averages of the vibration of the individual planet gears and sun gear in an epicyclic gearbox. J Sound Vibr 144:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianluca D’Elia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Irene Daini
    • 2
  • Luigi Romagnoli
    • 2
  • Emiliano Mucchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Engineering DepartmentUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly
  2. 2.Unicom S.r.l.CentoItaly

Personalised recommendations