Advertisement

Integration Approach for Local Damage Detection of Vibration Signal from Gearbox Based on KPSS Test

  • Anna Michalak
  • Agnieszka Wyłomańska
  • Jacek WodeckiEmail author
  • Radosław Zimroz
Conference paper
Part of the Applied Condition Monitoring book series (ACM, volume 15)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss a problem of local damage detection based on the vibration signal analysis. One of the classical approach is to extract features of the analyzed signal that differ for damaged and healthy case. We propose to test the integration property in order to check if given signal corresponds to healthy or damaged machine. The integration issue is known from the econometric analysis. However actually this methodology is used in various fields including operational condition monitoring and fault detection. We say the signal is integrated with order d if after differentiation d times it becomes stationary. In the proposed procedure we extract the appropriate subsignals from the original raw signal and use the Kwiatkowski–Phillips–Schmidt–Shin (KPSS) statistics in order to test if they are integrated. We expect that for the healthy case the subsignals are integrated, therefore the KPSS test does not reject the H0 hypothesis of integration. For the damaged case the subsignals containing the impulses related to damage are not integrated therefore the H0 hypothesis is rejected. This approach is a continuation of the authors’ previous works and allows to detect the local damage by the inspection of the KPSS statistics. We apply the methodology to the real vibration signals from gearbox.

Keywords

Local damage detection Integration Vibration signal analysis Gearbox 

References

  1. 1.
    Feng Z, Liang M, Chu F (2013) Recent advances in time-frequency analysis methods for machinery fault diagnosis: a review with application examples. Mech Syst Signal Process 38(1):165–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Randall RB, Antoni J (2011) Rolling element bearing diagnostics - a tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(2):485–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samuel PD, Pines DJ (2005) A review of vibration-based techniques for helicopter transmission diagnostics. J Sound Vibr 282(1):475–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Obuchowski J, Wylomańska A, Zimroz R (2014) Recent developments in vibration based diagnostics of gear and bearings used in belt conveyors. Appl Mech Mater 683:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wodecki J, Zdunek R, Wyłomańska A, Zimroz R (2017) Local fault detection of rolling element bearing components by spectrogram clustering with semi-binary NMF. Diagnostyka 18:3–8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wodecki J, Stefaniak P, Obuchowski J, Wylomanska A, Zimroz R (2016) Combination of principal component analysis and time-frequency representations of multichannel vibration data for gearbox fault detection. J Vibroeng 18(4):2167–2175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wodecki J, Zimroz R, Barszcz T (2017) Informative frequency band identification for automatic extraction of impulsive components in vibration data from rotating machinery. In: Vibroengineering PROCEDIA, vol 13, pp 109–114Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tkacz G (2001) Estimating the fractional order of integration of interest rates using a wavelet OLS estimator. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econometrics 5(1)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica J Econometric Soc 251–276MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Omenzetter P, Brownjohn JMW, Moyo P (2003) Tracing the behavior of a bridge using time series modeling. In: 4th International workshop on SHM, Palo Alto, pp 491–498Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stevenson S (2007) A comparison of the forecasting ability of arima models. J Property Investment Finance 25(3):223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engel C (1996) A note on cointegration and international capital market efficiency. J Int Money Finance 15(4):657–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tabrizi AA, Al-Bugharbee H, Trendafilova I, Garibaldi L (2016) A cointegration-based monitoring method for rolling bearings working in time-varying operational conditions. In: Meccanica, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cross EJ, Worden K, Chen Q (2011) Cointegration: a novel approach for the removal of environmental trends in structural health monitoring data. Proc R Soc Lond A 467(2133):2712–2732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dao PB, Staszewski WJ, Barszcz T, Uhl T (2018) Condition monitoring and fault detection in wind turbines based on cointegration analysis of scada data. Renewable Energy 116:107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zolna K, Dao PB, Staszewski WJ, Barszcz T (2015) Nonlinear cointegration approach for condition monitoring of wind turbines. Math Probl Eng 2015Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dao PB (2018) Condition monitoring of wind turbines based on cointegration analysis of gearbox and generator temperature data. Diagnostyka 19(1):63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michalak A, Wodecki J, Wyłomańska A, Zimroz R (2017) Application of cointegration to vibration signal for local damage detection in gearboxes. App Acoust.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.08.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hurd HL, Miamee A (2007) Periodically correlated random sequences: spectral theory and practice, vol 355. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Antoni J, Bonnardot F, Raad A, El Badaoui M (2004) Cyclostationary modelling of rotating machine vibration signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 18(6):1285–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gardner WA, Napolitano A, Paura L (2006) Cyclostationarity: half a century of research. Signal Process 86(4):639–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Napolitano A (2016) Cyclostationarity: new trends and applications. Signal Process 120:385–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Antoni J (2009) Cyclostationarity by examples. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(4):987–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kruczek P, Obuchowski J (2016) Cyclic modulation spectrum–an online algorithm. In: 24th Mediterranean conference on control and automation (MED) 2016, pp 361–365. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Javorskyj I, Kravets I, Matsko I, Yuzefovych R (2017) Periodically correlated random processes: application in early diagnostics of mechanical systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 83:406–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cioch W, Knapik O, Leśkow J (2013) Finding a frequency signature for a cyclostationary signal with applications to wheel bearing diagnostics. Mech Syst Signal Process 38(1):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Broszkiewicz-Suwaj E, Wyłomańska A (2004) Periodic correlation–integration and cointegration. Technical report, Technical report HSC/04/4, Wroclaw University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis, vol 2. Princeton University Press, PrincetonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366a):427–431MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Durbin J, Watson GS (1951) Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. ii. Biometrika 38(1/2):159–177MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PC, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econom 54(1–3):159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Michalak
    • 1
  • Agnieszka Wyłomańska
    • 1
  • Jacek Wodecki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Radosław Zimroz
    • 2
  1. 1.Research and Development CentreKGHM Cuprum LtdWroclawPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Diagnostics and Vibro-Acoustic Science LaboratoryWroclaw University of Science and TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations