Experimental Characterization of Metal-Mesh Isolator’s Damping Capacity by Constitutive Mechanical Model

  • Fares MezghaniEmail author
  • Alfonso Fernández del Rincón
  • Mohamed Amine Ben Souf
  • Pablo García Fernández
  • Fakher Chaari
  • Fernando Viadero Rueda
  • Mohamed Haddar
Conference paper
Part of the Applied Condition Monitoring book series (ACM, volume 15)


Metal mesh isolator is made of metallic wires. It has been widely used in vibration control engineering applications such as isolation mounting of machine tools. To investigate the performance of the metallic wires material, a set of dynamic tests was conducted for a range of frequencies and amplitudes of loading. The experimental results has demonstrated that the output of the isolator is revealed to the loading amplitude, however, slightly dependent to the loading frequency. As the loading amplitude increases, the dynamic mechanical property exhibits asymmetrical characteristic. Therefore, a model that includes the asymmetric non-linear elastic force, viscous damping and hysteretic coulomb friction is setup to describe the dynamic general restoring force. In this paper, an experimental identification methodology is presented to determine the unknown parameters of the constitutive mechanical model. The Bouc-Wen model was implemented to identify the unknown parameters of the hysteretic damping force. In order to measure the equivalent loss factor of nonlinear material, a damping capacity measurement method, based on the decomposition of the hysteresis loop, is brought forward. The equivalent loss factor of the metallic-wires material at different loading frequencies and amplitudes were measured through a damping capacity measurement method, based on the decomposition of the hysteresis loop. The results show that this material has excellent damping performance with loss factor about 0.4–0.5 for lower frequency and amplitude.


Metal mesh isolator The damping capacity Constitutive mechanical model Bouc-Wen model 


  1. 1.
    Ma Y, Zhang Q, Zhang D, Hu W, Hong J (2017) Smart Mater Struct 26(5):055019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antonio D, Pastoriza H (2009) J Microelectromech Syst 18(6):1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis WO (2011) J Microelectromech Syst 20(4):968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richardson MH, Formenti DL (1982) Proceedings of the 1st international modal analysis conference, vol 1, pp 167–186Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ge P, Jouaneh M (1995) Precis Eng 17(3):211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Riccardi L, Naso D, Turchiano B, Janocha H (2011) IECON 2011-37th annual conference on IEEE industrial electronics society. IEEE, pp 56–61Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al Janaideh M, Rakheja S, Su CY (2009) Smart Mater Struct 18(4):045001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al Janaideh M, Krejčí P (2012) Physica B 407(9):1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duhem P (1897) Z Phys Chem 22(1):545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouc R (1967) Proceedings of the fourth conference on non-linear oscillation, Prague, CzechoslovakiaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wen YK (1976) J Eng Mech Div 102(2):249Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu W, Wang DH (2012) Sens Actuators A 181:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang G, Chen G, Bai F (2015) Sens Actuators A 235:105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hou J, Bai H, Li D (2008) J Mater Process Technol 206(1):412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ikhouane F, Rodellar J (2005) Nonlinear Dyn 42(1):79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ikhouane F, Gomis-Bellmunt O (2008) Syst Control Lett 57(8):663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brancati R, Strano S, Timpone F (2011) Mech Syst Signal Process 25(7):2785CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fares Mezghani
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alfonso Fernández del Rincón
    • 2
  • Mohamed Amine Ben Souf
    • 1
  • Pablo García Fernández
    • 2
  • Fakher Chaari
    • 1
  • Fernando Viadero Rueda
    • 2
  • Mohamed Haddar
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Mechanics, Modelling and Production, National School of Engineering of SfaxUniversity of SfaxSfaxTunisia
  2. 2.Laboratory of Structural and Mechanical Engineering, Superior Technical School of Industrial Engineering and TelecommunicationsUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain

Personalised recommendations