Latency Assessment of MQTT Protocol in Transferring Data from the Field to the Cloud Over Different Gateways

  • Bakhat Kenitar SoukainaEmail author
  • Younes Ali
  • Arouia Mounir
  • Salhaoui Marouane
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure book series (LNITI)


Nowadays the operational technologies are constantly changing, and evolving day by day in order to make our life easier. The merger of the operational technologies and information led us into the so-called industrial internet of things. This transition is projected on our daily life, and this forms an essential pillar of industry 4.0. IOT combines the useful to pleasant with its implementation in the industry, it is from this concept that came the idea of the industry 4.0. Today, the most of industrial companies seek the ideal to prove their effectiveness in the field. For this reason, finding adequate solutions to the needs of the company is crucial. Managing a huge amount of data remains the most impressive obstacle that the company can face. Consequently, developing the layers related with data is a necessity. This paper highlights the estimation of latency in transferring data from the field to the cloud taking into consideration lightweight protocol MQTT over different gateways, we put into practice the IoT tool Node-RED in the gateway for simulation.


Ubiquitous computing Industry 4.0 MQTT broker MQTT latency IoT gateway Fog computing Groov edge opto22; siemens IoT2040 


  1. 1.
    Davies, N.: Twenty years on. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 11(1) (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ray, P.P.: A survey on Internet of Things architectures. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 30(3) (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salhaoui, M., Arioua, M., Guerrero-González, A., Socorro García-Cascales, M.: An IoT control system for wind power generators. In: 17th International Conference, IPMU 2018, Cádiz, Spain, 11–15 June 2018. Published in Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems Applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang, C., Shen, W., Wang, X.: Applications of Internet of Things in manufacturing. In: 20th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), Nanchang, pp. 670–675. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yassein, M.B., Shatnawi, M.Q., Al-zoubi, D.: Application layer protocols for the internet of things. In: International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS). IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferrari, P., Sisinni, E., Brandão, D., Rocha, M.: Evaluation of communication latency in industrial IoT applications. Published in International Workshop on Measurement and Networking (M&N). IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ubiquitous Computing: Available at:
  8. 8.
    Meshram, V., et al.: A survey on ubiquitous computing. Int. J. Semantic Comput. (2016). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sethi, P., Sarangi, S.R.: Internet of things: architectures, protocols, and applications. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2017, 25. Article ID 9324035 (2017). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiao, L., et al.: Cloud-based computation offloading for mobile devices: State of the art challenges and opportunities. In: Proceedings of Future Network and Mobile Summit, pp. 1–11 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stojmenovic, I., Wen, S.: The fog computing paradigm: scenarios and security issues. In: Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Warsaw, Poland. IEEE (2014).
  12. 12.
    Hu, P., Dhelim, S., Ning, H., Qiu, T.: Survey on fog computing: architecture, key technologies, applications andopen issues. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 98, 27–42 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mouradian, C., Naboulsi, D., Sami, Y., et al.: A comprehensive survey on fog computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 20 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yassein, M.B., Shatnawi, M.Q.:Internet of Things: survey and open issues of MQTT protocol. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krešimir, G., Špeh, I., Heÿi, I.: A web-based IoT solution for monitoring data using MQTT protocol. In: International Conference on Smart Systems and Technologies (SST). IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Durkop, L., Czybik, B., Jasperneite, J.: Performance evaluation of M2M protocols over cellular networks in a lab environment. 18th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN). IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dinesh, T., et al.: Performance evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a common middleware. IEEE Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP). IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Future of Industrial Communication: Automation networks in the era of the internet of things and Industry 4.0. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leitao, P., Barbosa, M.E.C. Papadopoulou, et al.: Standardization in cyber-physical systems: The ARUM case. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), pp. 2988–2993 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Astarloa, A., Bidarte, U., Jimenez, J., Zuloaga, A., Lazaro, J.: Intelligent gateway for Industry 4.0-compliant production lines. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jiang, X., Fischione, C., Pang, Z.: Low latency networking for Industry4.0. In: International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks (EWSN), Uppsala, Sweden, 20–22 Feb 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bakhat Kenitar Soukaina
    • 1
    Email author
  • Younes Ali
    • 2
  • Arouia Mounir
    • 1
  • Salhaoui Marouane
    • 1
  1. 1.National School of Applied SciencesUniversity Abdelmalek EssaadiTétouanMorocco
  2. 2.Faculty of ScienceUniversity Abdelmalek EssaadiTétouanMorocco

Personalised recommendations