Advertisement

The Mechatronic Device Which Provides Comfort and Safety for the Elderly and Disabled People

  • Jacek S. TutakEmail author
  • Wojciech Puzio
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 548)

Abstract

This article describes the device which provides comfort and safety for the elderly and disabled people. The system can be installed in any room, particularly in a flat or a house. The device is dedicated for the elderly and disabled people who are lonely. The project is based on the system that analyzes the pattern of the user’s behavior. Signals are received from many sensors and transform to the form which is readable. Based on the collected data, it is possible to detect early symptoms of illness and to inform the family. The article describes in detail the developed system, including: its diagnostic capabilities (in case of decreased activity, longer stay in bed, consumption of less food, compared to previous period reported in the developed system, may indicate the occurrence of the first symptoms e.g. depression); reporting to the doctor’s recommendations (in case the patient’s compliance with the diet, movement or recommended amount of sleep); comfort (adjust lighting/temperature/humidity to the user’s current behavior) or safety (information about dangerous situations, such as falling, or fading. The system observes a flat or a house while user is absent and can simulate presence through change light level or open/close windows). A great asset of the system is the low cost of implementation and no need to interfere with the existing infrastructure of the building.

Keywords

Mechatronic Hardware and software system Elderly and disabled people 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The innovative features of the presented device is further proven by the fact that a patent application No P.420306 for this mechatronic device which provides comfort and safety for the elderly and disabled people has been filed This work was supported in part the Vice-Rector for Research the Rzeszow University of Technology (DS.MA.17.001).

References

  1. 1.
    Vieira, A., Gabriel, J., Melo, C., et al.: Kinect system in home-based cardiovascular rehabilitation. J. Eng. Med. 231(1), 40–47 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stroke Association, Research Spend in the UK: Comparing stroke, cancer, coronary heart disease and dementia 2014. http://www.stroke.org.uk/research-spend-uk. Accessed 9 Jan 2017
  3. 3.
    Raisul Alam, M., Bin Ibne Reaz, M., Alauddin Mohd Ali, M.: A Review of smart homes – past, present, and future. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 42(6), 1190–1203 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lobaccaro, G., Carlucci, S., Löfström, E.: A review of systems and technologies for smart homes and smart grids. Energies 9(348), 1–33 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Linder, F.E., et al.: An index of health: mathematical models. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare. Public Health Service, Series 2, No. 5, May 1965Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tutak, J.S.: Design of ELISE robot for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors. J. Vibroengineering 18(6), 4069–4085 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giergiel, J., Kurc, K.: Identification of the mathematical model of an inspection mobile robot with fuzzy logic system and neural networks. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 49(1), 209–225 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hendzel, Z., Burghardt, A., Szuster, M.: Reinforcement learning in discrete neural control of the underactuated system. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7894, pp. 64–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38658-9_6CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dong-Yuan, G., Xi-Fan, Y., Qing-He, Y., et al.: Robot sensor calibration via neural network and particle swarm optimization enhanced with crossover and mutation. TV-TG 1(5), 1025–1033 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tutak, J.S.: Virtual reality and exercises for paretic upper limb of stroke survivors. TV-TG 24(2), 451–458 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hendzel, Z., Burghardt, A., Gierlak, P., et al.: Conventional and fuzzy force control in robotised machining. Solid State Phenomena. Trans Tech Publications, Vol. 210, pp. 178–185 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fitzpatrick, P., Needham, A., Natale, L., Metta, G.: Shared challenges in object perception for robots and infants. Infant. Child Dev. 17, 7–24 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kudasik, T., Libura, M., Markowska, O., Miechowicz, S.: Methods of reconstructing complex multi-structural anatomical objects with RP techniques. Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Techn. Sci. 64(2), 315–323 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kurc, K., Szybicki, D., Burghardt, A., et al.: The application of virtual prototyping methods to determine the dynamic parameters of mobile robot. Open Eng. 6(1), 55–63 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strumillo, P., Electronic interfaces aiding the visually impaired in environmental access, mobility and navigation. In: 3rd International Conference on Human System Interaction HSI 2010 − Conference Proceedings, pp. 17–24 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Giudice, N.A. (2013) Representing 3D space in working memory: spatial images from vision, hearing, touch, and language. In: Lacey, S., Lawson, R. (eds) Multisensory Imagery. Springer, New York, NY (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hannaford, B., Ryu, J.H.: Time-domain passivity control of haptic interfaces. IEEE Tran. Robot. Autom. 18(1), 1–10 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tutak, J.S., Wiech, J.: Horizontal automated storage and retrieval system. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 11(1), 82–95 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adams, R.J., Hannaford, B.: Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15(3), 465–474 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Budzik, G., Turek, P., Traciak, J.: The influence of change in slice thickness on the accuracy of reconstruction of cranium geometry. J Eng. Med. 231(3), 197–202 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bu, N., Okamoto, M., Tsuji, T.: A hybrid motion classification approach for EMG-based human-robot interfaces using bayesian and neural networks. IEEE Trans. Robot. 25(3), 502–511 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kowalczyk, A., Hanus, R., Szlachta, A.: Investigation of the statistical method of time delay estimation based on conditional averaging of delayed signal. Metrol. Meas. Syst. 18(2), 335–342 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shin, S.Y., Kim, J.Y., Lee, S., Lee, J., Kim, S.-J., Kim, C.: Intentional movement performance ability (IMPA): a method for robot-aided quantitative assessment of motor function. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pp. 1–6 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kowalczyk, A., Szlachta, A., Hanus, R., Chorzępa, R.: Estimation of conditional expected value for expone ntially autocorrelated data. Metrol. Meas. Syst. 24(1), 69–78 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Llewellyn, F.: Some fundamental properties of transmission systems. Proc. IRE 40(3), 271–283 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Department of Applied Mechanics and RoboticsRzeszow University of TechnologyRzeszowPoland

Personalised recommendations