Monitoring the Parameters of Industrial Robots

  • Paweł Obal
  • Andrzej BurghardtEmail author
  • Krzysztof Kurc
  • Dariusz Szybicki
  • Piotr Gierlak
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 548)


The article presents two commercial tools used to monitor the parameters of robot operation. They are briefly characterised, and their advantages, disadvantages and limitations described. The indicated shortcomings led to the development of a proprietary program, which allows for monitoring the parameters of ABB robot operation. The application’s task is to collect data about the parameters of the robot’s movements and store them as variables intended for further use. The study method was to capture the data transmitted between the controller and the program. The Wireshark software was used to identify the manner of communication, syntax and content of the data packages transmitted. The obtained data enabled the writing of a program for communication and registration of the defined robot parameters using a Matlab script file. In order to check the correctness of application performance, a numerical experiment was carried out, which involved connecting to a virtual controller, and an experiment involving connecting to a real controller. The performed tests confirmed the correctness of the developed application.


ABB robots Wireshark Robot operation monitoring RobotStudio ABB test signal viewer Matlab 


  1. 1.
    Kost, G., Reclik D.: Aplikacja systemu InTouch do monitorowania stanu zrobotyzowanego gniazda produkcyjnego. Instytut Automatyzacji Procesów Technologicznych i Zintegrowanych Systemów Wytwarzania Politechniki Śląskiej w Gliwicach, 59–68, Gliwice (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hui-Ping, Liu, Dai-Min, C., Miao, Y.: Communication of multi-robot system on the TCP/IP In: mechatronic science, electric engineering and computer (MEC). In: International Conference on. IEEE, 1432–1435 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang, Y.F.: The application of the TCP/IP on the robot system. Appl. Mech. Mater. 159, 351–354 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gierlak, P., Burghardt, A., Szybicki, D., Szuster, M., Muszyńska, M.: On-line manipulator tool condition monitoring based on vibration analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 89, 14–26 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burghardt, A., Szybicki, D., Kurc, K., Muszyńska, M., Mucha, J.: Experimental study of Inconel 718 surface treatment by edge robotic Deburring with force control. Strength Mater. 49(4), 594–604 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burghardt, A., Kurc, K., Szybicki, D., Muszyńska, M., Szczęch, T.: Monitoring the parameters of the robot-operated quality control process. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 11(1), 232–236 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tao, Z., Ueno, H.: Knowledge model-based heterogeneous multi-robot system implemented by a software platform. Knowl. Based Syst. 20(3), 310–319 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paweł Obal
    • 1
  • Andrzej Burghardt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Krzysztof Kurc
    • 1
  • Dariusz Szybicki
    • 1
  • Piotr Gierlak
    • 1
  1. 1.Rzeszow University of TechnologyRzeszówPoland

Personalised recommendations