• Angela D. Nichols
Part of the Human Rights Interventions book series (HURIIN)


Truth commissions are one of the many tools societies may establish following a period of authoritarianism or civil war. As they are increasingly adopted, this book compares the various truth commissions that have been created in the recent past and their ability to impact human rights and violence. This chapter introduces the project and discusses why it is a significant contribution to the literature regarding post-conflict processes, transitional justice, and truth commissions.


Transitional justice Truth commissions Post-authoritarianism Post-conflict 


  1. Akhavan, Payam. 2001. Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities? American Journal of International Law 95 (1): 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Josef Hirsch, M. 2014. Ideational Change and the Emergence of the International Norm of Truth and Reconciliation Commissions. European Journal of International Relations 20 (3): 810–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fariss, Christopher J. 2014. Respect for Human Rights Has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability. American Political Science Review 108 (2): 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freeman, Mark. 2006. Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibson, James L. 2004. Does Truth Lead to Reconciliation? Testing the Causal Assumptions of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Process. American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2006. The Contributions of Truth to Reconciliation Lessons from South Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (3): 409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2009. Group-Conflict Resolution: Sources of Resistance to Reconciliation: On Legitimacy Theory and the Effectiveness of Truth Commissions. Law & Contemporary Problems 72: 123–271.Google Scholar
  8. Grodsky, Brian. 2008. Justice Without Transition: Truth Commissions in the Context of Repressive Rule. Human Rights Review 9 (3): 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayner, P.B. 1994. Fifteen Truth Commissions-1974 to 1994: A Comparative Study. Human Rights Quarterly 16: 597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2010. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. Didcot: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, Hunjoon, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2007. Do Human Rights Trials Make a Difference. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2010. Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries1. International Studies Quarterly 54 (4): 939–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loyle, C.E. 2018. Transitional Justice and Political Order in Rwanda. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41 (4): 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loyle, C.E., and C. Davenport. 2016. Transitional Injustice: Subverting Justice in Transition and Postconflict Societies. Journal of Human Rights 15 (1): 126–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meernik, J. 2003. Victor’s Justice or the Law? Judging and Punishing at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (2): 140–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2005. Justice and Peace? How the International Criminal Tribunal Affects Societal Peace in Bosnia. Journal of Peace Research 42 (3): 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meernik, James D., Angela D. Nichols, and Kimi L. King. 2010. The Impact of International Tribunals and Domestic Trials on Peace and Human Rights After Civil War. International Studies Perspectives 11 (4): 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendeloff, D. 2004. Truth-Seeking, Truth-Telling, and Postconflict Peacebuilding: Curb the Enthusiasm? 1. International Studies Review 6 (3): 355–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olsen, T.D., L.A. Payne, and A.G. Reiter. 2010a. Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  20. Olsen, Tricia D., Leigh A. Payne, Andrew G. Reiter, and Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm. 2010b. When Truth Commissions Improve Human Rights. International Journal of Transitional Justice 4 (3): 457–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quinn, J.R., and M. Freeman. 2003. Lessons Learned: Practical Lessons Gleaned from Inside the Truth Commissions of Guatemala and South Africa. Human Rights Quarterly 25 (4): 1117–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roht-Arriaza, N., and J. Mariezcurrena. 2006. Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth Versus Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scharf, Michael P. 1996. Case for a Permanent International Truth Commission. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 7: 375–410.Google Scholar
  24. Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  25. Sikkink, Kathryn, and Carrie Booth Walling. 2007. The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research 44 (4): 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Snyder, Jack, and Leslie Vinjamuri. 2004. Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice. International Security 28 (3): 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stewart, B., and E. Wiebelhaus-Brahm. 2017. The Quantitative Turn in Transitional Justice Research: What Have We Learned About Impact? Transitional Justice Review 1 (5): 97–133.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, L.K., and A. Dukalskis. 2012. Old Truths and New Politics Does Truth Commission Publicness Impact Democratization? Journal of Peace Research 49 (5): 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Teitel, R.G. 2000. Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Thoms, O.N.T., J. Ron, and R. Paris. 2010. State-Level Effects of Transitional Justice: What Do We Know? International Journal of Transitional Justice 4 (3): 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. USIP. 2011. Truth Commission Digital Collection.
  32. Van der Merwe, H., V. Baxter, and A.R. Chapman. 2009. Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace (USIP).Google Scholar
  33. Vinjamuri, L., and J. Snyder. 2004. Advocacy and Scholarship in the Study of International War Crime Tribunals and Transitional Justice. Annual Review of Political Science 7: 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. 2015. Law and Politics in Transitional Justice. Annual Review of Political Science 18: 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. 2010. Truth Commissions and Transitional Societies: The Impact on Human Rights and Democracy. Didcot: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela D. Nichols
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations