Advertisement

Parable of the Talents: Integrity, Credibility, and Accountability

  • Bruce E. Winston
Chapter
Part of the Christian Faith Perspectives in Leadership and Business book series (CFPLB)

Abstract

This chapter uses Matthew’s account of the Parable of the Talents to illustrate two employees who honored the master and accomplished their tasks to the best of their abilities as quickly as they could and one employee who did not honor the master by not accomplishing what was assigned. Matthew’s account of the parable indicates that the master knew the capability and capacity of each employee and assigned the task to be within each employee’s skill set. Employees should not accept assignments that they do not fit within the employees’ skill set or are beyond the employees’ capacity. When there is a perception of a person-job fit, employees should communicate the concerns to the master and either clarify the expectations or decline to accept the responsibility. Employees demonstrate integrity when they behave as they have presented themselves and they demonstrate credibility when they accomplish what they imply they will accomplish. Accountability occurs when the employees acknowledge (a) their responsibility, (b) transparency of behaviors, and (c) consequences of their behaviors.

Keywords

Accountability Responsibility Transparency Consequences 

References

  1. Brisson, E. C. (2002). Between text and sermon: Matthew 25:14–30. Interpretation, 56(3), 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chenoweth, B. (2005). Identifying the talents. Tyndale Bulletin, 56, 61–72.Google Scholar
  3. Cleary, M., Walter, G., Horsfall, J., & Jackson, D. (2013). Promoting integrity in the workplace: A priority for all academic health professionals. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 45(2), 264–268. Retrieved from http://eres.regent.edu:2048/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1470887115?accountid=13479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1990). The credibility factor: What followers expect from their leaders. Management Review, 79(1), 29. Retrieved from http://eres.regent.edu:2048/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/206693297?accountid=13479Google Scholar
  5. Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. Online Lexicon. Retrieved from http://stephanus.tlg.uci.edu/lsj/#eid=109787&context=lsj&action=from-search
  6. Wood, J. A. J., & Winston, B. E. (2005). Toward a new understanding of leader accountability: Defining a critical construct. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(3), 84–94. Retrieved from http://eres.regent.edu:2048/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.regent.edu/docview/203133296?accountid=13479CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce E. Winston
    • 1
  1. 1.Regent UniversityChesapeakeUSA

Personalised recommendations