Ways of Organising Assortment

  • Constant Berkhout


Strong evidence is given to show that the different ways of organising a category have a larger impact on sales than the amount of space allocated to the products. Rules of thumb are no longer sufficient and category managers have the opportunity to make more rational, fact-based driven decisions on space allocation. Berkhout suggests some 15 techniques that make the way of merchandising more effective. These are all supported with academic studies and can be implemented both in online and brick-and-mortar stores.


  1. Argo, J. J., Dahl, W. D., & Morales, A. C. (2006). Consumer Contamination: How Consumers React to Products Touched by Others. Journal of Marketing, 70, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atalay, A. S., Bodur, H. O., & Rasolofoarison, D. (2012). Shining in the Center: Central Gaze Cascade Effect on Product Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 848–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christenfeld, N. (1995). Choices from Identical Options. Psychological Science, 6(1), 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deng, X., Kahn, B. E., Unnava, H. R., & Lee, H. (2016). A “Wide” Variety: Effects of Horizontal Versus Vertical Display on Assortment Processing, Perceived Variety, and Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 682–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diehl, K., Van Herpen, E., & Lamberton, C. (2015). Organizing Products with Complements versus Substitutes: Effects on Store Preferences as a Function of Effort and Assortment Perceptions. Journal of Retailing, 91(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drèze, X., Hoch, S. J., & Purk, M. E. (1994). Shelf Management and Space Elasticity. Journal of Retailing, 70(4), 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansen, J. M., Raut, S., & Swami, S. (2010). Retail Shelf Allocation: A Comparative Analysis of Heuristic and Meta-Heuristic Approaches. Journal of Retailing, 86(1), 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huffman, C., & Kahn, B. (1998). Variety for Sale: Mass Customization or Mass Confusion. Journal of Retailing, 74(4), 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kahn, B., & Wansink, B. (2004). The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lamberton, C. P., & Diehl, K. (2013). Retail Choice Architecture: The Effects of Benefit- and Attribute-Based Assortment Organization on Consumer Perceptions and Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the Sunny Side Is Up: Associations between Affect and Vertical Position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T., & Iyengar, S. S. (2008). The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases Choosers’ Perceptions of Assortment Variety and Outcome Satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 202–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morales, A., Kahn, B. E., McAlister, L., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2005). Perceptions of Assortment Variety: The Effects of Congruency between Consumers’ Internal and Retailers’ External Organization. Journal of Retailing, 81(2), 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2009). On Southbound Ease and Northbound Fees: Literal Consequences of the Metaphoric Link between Vertical Position and Cardinal Direction. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 715–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parker, J. R., & Lehmann, D. R. (2011). When Shelf-Based Scarcity Impacts Consumer Preferences. Journal of Retailing, 87(2), 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Robinson, S. G., Brady, M. K., Lemonc, K. N., & Giebelhausen, M. (2016). Less of This One? I’ll Take It: New Insights on the Influence of Shelf-based Scarcity. International Journal of Marketing, 33(4), 961–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shaw, J. I., Bergen, J. E., Brown, C. A., & Gallagher, M. E. (2000). Centrality Preferences in Choices among Similar Options. Journal of General Psychology, 127(2), 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Townsend, C., & Kahn, B. (2014). The Visual Preference Heuristic: The Influence of Visual Versus Verbal Depiction on Assortment Processing, Perceived Variety, and Choice Overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 993–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Valenzuela, A., & Raghubir, P. (2015). Are Consumers Aware of Top-Bottom But Not of Left-Right Inferences? Implications for Shelf Space Positions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(3), 224–241.Google Scholar
  20. Valenzuela, A., Raghubir, P., & Mitakakis, C. (2013). Shelf Space Schemas: Myth or Reality? Journal of Business Research, 66, 881–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Nierop, E., Fok, D., & Franses, P. H. (2006). Interaction between Shelf Layout and Marketing Effectiveness and Its Impact on Optimizing Shelf Arrangements, Erasmus Research Institute of Management, ERS-2006-013-MKT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constant Berkhout
    • 1
  1. 1.Rijnbrug AdviesUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations