The Civil Affairs Information Matrix: Designing Context-Aware Visual Analytics Enabling Mission Planning with Ensemble Learning

  • Ryan MullinsEmail author
  • Benjamin Ford
  • Lynndee Kemmet
  • Shana Weissman
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 903)


With the pivot towards grey zone operations, the United States Army must engage, influence, and partner with local populations in order to achieve the military objectives of their foreign policy. However, the knowledge that enables successful partnerships is split between the Civil Affairs and Intelligence staff elements. Here, we present the Civil Affairs Information Matrix, a context-aware visual analytics capability enabling automated gap analysis for grey zone operations using fused Civil Affairs and Intelligence data. The Civil Affairs Information Matrix uses semi-supervised and unsupervised learning techniques to fuse and annotate data (for example, surveys and news reports), generate potential actions from this data to address gaps and leverage strengths, and visualize the annotated data and rank-ordered potential actions to planners for consideration. Our ensemble approach enables more collaborative planning processes for grey zone operations that will ensure appropriate and dynamic responses to local population interests while achieving the planned outcomes.


Visual analytics Context-aware systems Ensemble modeling Civil-military operations Mission planning Intelligent decision support 



This work was conducted in connection with contract W56KGU-17-C-0039 with the U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Research, Development, and Engineering Center. We would like to thank Mr. Raymond McGowan, Dr. Lynn Copeland, Mr. Tim Strong, and Ms. Stacy Pfautz for their contributions to this work as thought partners.


  1. 1.
    Kapusta, P.: The Gray Zone. United States Special Operations Command, Tampa (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Echevarria, A.I.: Operating in the Gray Zone: An Alternative Paradigm for US Military Strategy. Army War College-Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Army, U.S.: Field Manual 6–0: Commander and Staff Organization and Operations. Department of the Army, Washington, D.C. (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Army, U.S.: Army Doctrine Reference Publication 5–0: The Operations Process. Department of the Army, Washington, D.C. (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Army, U.S.: Army Techniques Publication 3-57.60: Civil Affairs Civil Information Management. Department of the Army, Washington, D.C. (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stolberg, A. G.: Making National security policy in the 21st century. In: Bartholomees, J. B. (Ed.) The US Army War College Guide to National Security Issues: National Security Policy and Strategy, vol. 2, pp. 29–46. United States Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Army, U.S.: Army Techniques Publication 2-22.9: Open Source Intelligence. Department of the Army, Washington, D.C. (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bagozzi et al.: Political language ontology for verifiable event records event, actor, and data interchange specification. Technical Report, Open Event Data Alliance (2018).
  9. 9.
    Army, U.S.: Field Manual 3-57: Civil Affairs Operations. Department of the Army, Washington, D.C. (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan Mullins
    • 1
    Email author
  • Benjamin Ford
    • 1
  • Lynndee Kemmet
    • 2
  • Shana Weissman
    • 1
  1. 1.Aptima, Inc.WoburnUSA
  2. 2.United States Military AcademyWest PointUSA

Personalised recommendations