Advertisement

Augmented Reality in Order Picking—Boon and Bane of Information (Over-) Availability

  • Ralf Elbert
  • Tessa SarnowEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 903)

Abstract

Nowadays, 75% of warehouses are operated manually with more than half of the costs caused by the process of order picking. To enhance efficiency various technical support systems are used. Recently, augmented reality applications gain great attention in operational processes in logistics. While most of them focus on the different process steps, there is a lack of research on the question how to employ augmented reality under consideration of cognitive ergonomics and related design principles. Making use of literature as well as empirical data gained in qualitative interviews with eleven order pickers, this research proposes designs for the user interfaces for three primal levels of order picking support to make the amount of available information controllable. Furthermore, three calibration options used to control the visualization of information are evaluated regarding usability and necessity. The results indicate that individual calibration of the interface is seen as crucial. Additionally, requirements for the primal support levels were directed towards a clear line-of-sight and presentation of additional order-related information.

Keywords

Augmented reality Order picking Logistics Cognitive ergonomics 

References

  1. 1.
    Cirulis, A., Ginters, E.: Augmented reality in logistics. Proc. Comput. Sci. 26, 14–20 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwerdtfeger, B., Reif, R., Günthner, W.A., Klinker, G.: Pick-by-vision: there is something to pick at the end of the augmented tunnel. Virtual Reality 15, 213–223 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klinker, K., et al.: Structure for innovations: a use case taxonomy for smart glasses in service processes. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik Lüneburg, Deutschland (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sarupuri, B., Lee, G. A., Billinghurst, M.: Using augmented reality to assist fork-lift operation. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 16–24. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ginters, E., Martin-Gutierrez, J.: Low cost augmented reality and RFID application for logistics items visualization. Proc. Comput. Sci. 26, 3–13 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elbert, R., Knigge, J., Sarnow, T.: Transferability of order picking performance and training effects achieved in a virtual reality using head mounted devices. In: Preprints of the 16th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petersen, N., Stricker, D.: Cognitive augmented reality. Comput. Graph. 53, 82–91 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, X., Dunston, P.S.: Compatibility issues in augmented reality systems for AEC: an experimental prototype study. Autom. Constr. 15, 314–326 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Renner, P., Pfeiffer, T.: Augmented reality assistance in the central field-of-view outperforms peripheral displays for order picking: results from a virtual reality simulation study (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hegarty, M.: The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: implications for design. Topic Cogn. Sci. 3, 446–474 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Funk, M., Mayer, S., Nistor, M., Schmidt, A.: Mobile in-situ pick-by-vision: order picking support using a projector helmet. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kretschmer, V., Eichler, A., Spee, D., Rinkenauer, G.: Cognitive ergonomics in the intralogistics sector. In: Interdisciplinary Conference on Production, Logistics and Traffic, Darmstadt (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruffieux, J., Keller, M., Lauber, B., Taube, W.: Changes in standing and walking performance under dual-task conditions across the lifespan. Sports Med. 45, 1739–1758 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations