Advertisement

Defining Generic Tasks to Guide UAVs in a MUM-T Aerial Combat Environment

  • Sebastian LindnerEmail author
  • Simon Schwerd
  • Axel Schulte
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 903)

Abstract

In the fighter jet domain, it is very difficult to delegate tasks to unmanned systems because such a MUM-T scenario contains tasks from different dimensions, e.g. from AI, SEAD, OCA, etc. At the same time, there is a demand for a uniform and transparent operating concept, e.g. using a tactical map. Therefore, a way is looked for to describe the many different tasks with a uniform framework. In the presented approach a task command is split into an environmental object (physical, logical) to which the instruction refers. A military action to be performed on this object and a time parameterization (slack-time).

The object specification corresponds to the classification as it is usual for vectorized GIS data (point, line, area). The military action results from the different types of use (AI, SEAD, etc.) and the domains of action (Intelligence, Effect, etc.).

Keywords

Human-autonomy teaming Cognitive agent Task-based control human-system integration Control pattern Task formalization 

References

  1. 1.
    Clauß, S., Schulte, A. (eds.): Task Delegation in an Agent Supervisory Control Relationship Capability Awareness in a Cognitive Agent. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uhrmann, J., Schulte, A.: Concept, design and evaluation of cognitive task-based UAV guidance. J. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5(1) (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Onken, R., Schulte, A.: System-Ergonomic Design of Cognitive Automation: Dual-Mode Cognitive Design of Vehicle Guidance and Control Work Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schulte, A., Donath, D., Lange, D.S. (eds.): Design Patterns for Human-Cognitive Agent Teaming. Springer (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gangl, S., Lettl, B., Schulte, A. (eds.): Management of Multiple Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles from a Single-Seat Fighter Cockpit in Manned-Unmanned Fighter Missions. AIAA (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heilemann, F., Schulte, A. (eds.): Interaction Concept for Mixed-Initiative Planning on Multiple Delegation Levels in Multi-UCAV Fighter Missions. IHSI, San Diego (2019)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wagner, M. (ed.): Taking humans out of the loop: Implications for international humanitarian law. J. Law Inf. Sci. (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rudnick, G., Schulte, A. (eds.): Scalable Autonomy Concept for Reconnaissance UAVs on the Basis of an HTN Agent Architecture. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mnih, V., et al. (eds.): Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Myers, L.B., Tijerina, L., Geddie, J.C.: Proposed Military Standard for Task Analysis. Battelle Columbus Div OH (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maliene, V., Grigonis, V., Palevičius, V., Griffiths, S.: Geographic information system: old principles with new capabilities. Urban Des. Int. 16(1), 1–6 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coppin, G., Legras, F. (eds.): Controlling Swarms of Unmanned Vehicles through User-Centered Commands. AAAI, Toronto (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Lindner
    • 1
  • Simon Schwerd
    • 1
  • Axel Schulte
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Flight SystemsUniversität der Bundeswehr MunichNeubibergGermany

Personalised recommendations