Advertisement

An Exploratory Analysis of Physiological Data Aiming to Support an Assistant System for Helicopter Crews

  • Matthew MastersEmail author
  • Diana Donath
  • Axel Schulte
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 903)

Abstract

Utilizing a helicopter simulator developed within the Institute of Flight Systems at the University of the Armed Forces Munich, this work investigates how human resource theory and real-time physiological monitoring might support an adaptive assistant system intended to provide mission-relevant support to a helicopter crew during simulated mission scenarios. This investigation is conducted through an analysis of a series of simulated missions flown by subjects of varying experience with the simulator. Across-subject analysis highlights the significant variability of subject physiological responses and perceived workload. Additionally, correlations between various biological signals and assessed and perceived workload are identified. Within-subject analysis illustrates the temporal characteristics of various biological signals in this environment and reveals evidences suggesting future modeling of perceived workload though biological signals and a task-based workload assessment are promising.

Keywords

Adaptive automation Physiological monitoring Assistant systems Human-autonomy-teaming Manned-unmanned teaming 

References

  1. 1.
    Christoffersen, K., Woods, D.D.: How to make automated systems team players. In: Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, vol. 2, pp. 1–12. Elsevier (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brand, Y., Schulte, A.: Design and evaluation of a workload-adaptive associate system for cockpit crews. In: Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 3–18. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Honecker, F., Schulte, A.: Automated online determination of pilot activity under uncertainty by using evidential reasoning. In: Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Cognition and Design, pp. 231–250. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Honecker F., Brand, Y., Schulte, A.: A task-centered approach for workload-adaptive pilot associate systems. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the European Association for Aviation Psychology, pp. 485–507. Cascais (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bakker, J., Pechenizkiy, M., Sidorova, N.: What’s your current stress level? Detection of stress patterns from GSR sensor data. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thayer, J.F., Ahs, F., Fredrikson, M., Sollers, J.J., Wager, T.D.: A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 36, pp. 747–756. Elsevier (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hjortskov, N., Rissen, D., Blangsted, A.K., Fallentin, N., Lundberg, U., Sogaard, K.: The effect of mental stress on heart rate variability and blood pressure during computer work. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 92(1–2), 84–89. Springer (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität der Bundeswehr MünchenNeubibergGermany

Personalised recommendations