Advertisement

Plea Bargaining: The Influence of Counsel

  • Kelsey S. HendersonEmail author
  • Lora M. Levett
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Psychology and Law book series (APL, volume 4)

Abstract

For the criminal defendant, his attorney acts as his loyal and zealous advocate before the court (American Bar Association, 2015), and due process protections of the U.S. adversarial system have afforded this relationship special privilege. In this chapter, we explore the influence and role of the attorney in plea decision-making. We first explore the legal context of the attorney’s role in plea bargaining, reviewing several cases that address a defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel. We then review the shadow of trial theory and other theoretical perspectives as they relate to the attorney’s role in the plea bargaining process, providing a theoretical background to understand how the attorney’s advice and role likely influence a defendant’s decision to accept a guilty plea offer. Then, we discuss the research examining legal and extra-legal factors that influence the type of advice an attorney gives a client contemplating a guilty plea offer, considering the implications of this research for the current standards used to define effective assistance of counsel. Last, we explore future research possibilities that could contribute to the understanding of the role the attorney plays in the plea bargaining process.

Keywords

Plea bargaining Guilty pleas Social influence Attorneys Effective assistance of counsel 

References

  1. Albonetti, C. (1997). Sentencing under the Federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991–1992. Law & Society Review, 31, 789–822.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3053987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkon, C. (2016). Plea bargain negotiations: Defining competence beyond Lafler & Frye. American Criminal Law Review, 53, 377–407. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2808303.
  3. Alschuler, A. W. (1986). Personal failure, institutional failure, and the sixth amendment. New York Review of Law and Social Change, 14, 149–156. Retrieved from http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2002&context=journal_articles.
  4. Alschuler, A. W. (1979). Plea bargaining and its history. Law and Society Review, 13, 211–245.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3053250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alschuler, A. W. (1975). The defense attorney’s role in plea bargaining. The Yale Law Journal, 84(6), 1179–1315.  https://doi.org/10.2307/795498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. American Bar Association. (2014). The Missouri project: A study of the Missouri Public defender system and attorney workload standards. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/events/legal_aid_indigent_defendants/2014/ls_sclaid_5c_the_missouri_project_report.authcheckdam.pdf.
  7. American Bar Association. (2015). ABA criminal justice standards for the defense function, 4th ed. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/DefenseFunctionFourthEdition.html#1.2.
  8. Amsterdam, A. G. (1988). Trial manual 5 for the defense of criminal cases (Vol. 1). Philadelphia, PA: American Law Institute-American Bar Association Committee on Continuing Professional Education.Google Scholar
  9. Anderson, J. M. & Heaton, P. (2012). How much difference does the lawyer make? The effect of defense counsel on murder case outcomes. Yale Law Journal, 122, 154–187. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23528652.
  10. Argersinger v. (1972). Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25.Google Scholar
  11. Armstrong, K. (2014, December 10). What can you do with a drunken lawyer? The Marshall Project. Retrieved from https://www.themarshallproject.org/2014/12/10/what-can-you-do-with-a-drunken-lawyer#.yfgLZlXHV.
  12. Betts v. (1942). Brady, 316 U.S. 455.Google Scholar
  13. Bibas, S. (2004). Plea bargaining outside the shadow of a trial. Harvard Law Review, 117, 2463–2547.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4093404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blumberg, A. (1967). The Practice of law as a confidence game: Organizational cooptation of a profession. Law and Society Review, 1(2), 15–40.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3052933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boccaccini, M. T., & Brodsky, S. L. (2002). Attorney-client trust among convicted criminal defendants: Preliminary examination of the attorney-client trust scale. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 69–87.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boccaccini, M. T., Boothby, J. L., & Brodsky, S. L. (2004). Development and effects of client trust in criminal defense attorney: Preliminary examination of the congruence model of trust development. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 197–214.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boykin v. (1969). Alabama, 395 U.S. 238.Google Scholar
  18. Brady v. (1970) United States, 397 U.S. 742.Google Scholar
  19. Bushway, S. D., & Redlich, A. D. (2012). Is plea bargaining in the “shadow of the trial” a mirage? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 437–454.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-011-9147-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bushway, S. D., Redlich, A. D., & Norris, R. J. (2014). An explicit test of plea bargaining in the “Shadow of the Trial”. Criminology, 54(4), 723–754.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Campbell, C., Moore, J., Maier, W., & Gaffney, M. (2015). Unnoticed, untapped, and underappreciated: Clients’ perceptions of their public defenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(6), 751–770.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Casper, J. D. (1970). “Did you have a lawyer when you went to court- no, I had a public defender. Yale Review of Law and Social Action, 1(4). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi/article=1022&context=yrlsa.
  23. Casper, J. D. (1972). American criminal justice: The defendant’s perspective. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Champion, D. J. (1989). Private counsels and public defenders: A look at weak cases, prior records, and leniency in plea bargaining. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 253–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(89)90031-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cohen, T. H. & Reaves, B. A. (2006). Felony defendants in large urban counties, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=896.
  27. Cooper, A. (2017, April 16). Inside NOLA public defenders’ decision to refuse felony cases. CBS 60 Minutes. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/inside-new-orleans-public-defenders-decision-to-refuse-felony-cases/ftag=CNM-00-10aab5j&linkId=36566717.
  28. Durose, M. R. & Langan, P. A. (2007). Felony sentences in state courts, 2004. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fssc04.pdf.
  29. Edkins, V. A. (2011). Defense attorney plea recommendations and client race: Does zealous representation apply equally to all? Law and Human Behavior, 35, 413–425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9254-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman, L. (1979). Plea bargaining in historical perspective. Law and Society Review, 13, 248–259.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3053251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fountain, E. N. & Woolard, J. L. (2018). How defense attorneys consult with juvenile clients about plea bargains. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 24(2), 192–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gideon v. (1963) Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.Google Scholar
  33. Goodman-Delahunty, J., Granhag, P. A., Hartwig, M., & Loftus, E. F. (2010). Insightful or wishful: Lawyers’ ability to predict case outcomes. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(2), 133–157.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harlow, C. W. (2000). Defense counsel in criminal cases. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=28.
  35. Hartley, R. D., Miller, H. V., & Spohn, C. (2010). Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Henderson, K. S., & Levett, L. M. (2018). Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas. Law and Human Behavior, 42(5), 427–441.  https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985).Google Scholar
  38. Houston, K. A., Meissner, C. A., & Evans, J. R. (2014). Psychological processes underlying true and false confessions. In R. Bull (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 19–34). New York, NY, US: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. In re Gault. (1967). 387 U.S. 1.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson v. Zerbst. (1938). 304 U.S. 458.Google Scholar
  41. Kramer, G. M., Wolbransky, M., & Heilbrun, K. (2007). Plea bargaining recommendations by criminal defense attorneys: Evidence strength, potential sentence, and defendant preference. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 575–585.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lafler v. Cooper. (2012). 132 S. Ct. 1376.Google Scholar
  43. Laird, L. (2017, January). Starved of money for too long, public defender offices are suing—and starting to win. ABA Journal. Retrieved from http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/the_gideon_revolution/.
  44. McAllister, H. A. & Bregman, N. J. (1986). Plea bargaining by prosecutors and defense attorneys: A decision theory approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 686–690.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCoy v. Louisiana. (2018). S. Ct. 16–8255.Google Scholar
  46. Malloy, L., Shulman, E., & Cauffman, E. (2014). Interrogations, confessions, and guilty pleas among serious adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 38(2), 181–193.  https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Missouri v. Frye. (2012). 132 S. Ct. 1399.Google Scholar
  48. Mnookin, R. H., & Kornhauser, L. (1979). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce. Yale Law Journal, 88, 950–997.  https://doi.org/10.2307/795824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Muniz v. Smith. (2011). 647 F.3d 619.Google Scholar
  50. Nixon, R. (2013, August 23). Public defenders are tightening belts because of steep federal budget cuts. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/us/public-defenders-are-tightening-belts-because-of-steep-federal-budget-cuts.html.
  51. North Carolina v. (1970). Alford, 400 U.S. 25.Google Scholar
  52. Padilla v. (2010). Commonwealth of Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356.Google Scholar
  53. People v. Badia. (1990).159 A.D.2d 57.Google Scholar
  54. Pezdek, K., & O’Brien, M. (2014). Plea bargaining and appraisals of eyewitness evidence by prosecutors and defense attorneys. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 20(3), 222–241.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.770855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Powell v. Alabama. (1932). 287 U.S. 45.Google Scholar
  56. Redlich, A. D. (2016). The validity of pleading guilty. In M. K. Miller & B. Bornstein (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 1–27). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  57. Redlich, A. D., Bibas, S., Edkins, V. A., & Madon, S. (2017). The Psychology of Defendant Plea Decision Making. American Psychologist, 72(4), 339–352.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Redlich, A. D., Bushway, S. D., & Norris, R. J. (2016). Plea decision-making by attorneys and judges. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 537–561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9264-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Redlich, A. D., & Shteynberg, R. V. (2016). To plead or not to plead: A comparison of Juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 611–625.  https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Redlich, A. D., Summers, A., & Hoover, S. (2010). Self-reported false confessions and false guilty pleas among offenders with mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 79–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9194-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Roach, M. A. (2014). Indigent defense counsel, attorney quality, and defendant outcomes. American Law and Economics Review, 16(2), 577–619.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahu003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Santobello v. (1971). New York, 404 U.S. 257.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, A. (2007). “I ain’t takin’ no plea”: The challenges in counseling young people facing serious time. Rutgers Law Review, 60(1), 11–31. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/875.
  64. Spohn, C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: the quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice, 3, 427–501. Retrieved from http://www.justicestudies.com/pubs/livelink3-1.pdf.
  65. Strickland v. Washington. (1984). 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674.Google Scholar
  66. Sudnow, D. (1969). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. In William Chambliss (Ed.), Crime and the legal process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  67. Tor, A., Gazal-Ayal, O., & Garcia, S. (2010). Fairness and the willingness to accept plea bargain offers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(1), 97–116.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01171.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Turner, J. I. & Redlich, A. D. (2016). Two models of pre-plea discovery in criminal cases: An empirical comparison. Washington and Lee Law Review, 73, 285–408. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi/referer=&httpsredir=1&article=4488&context=wlulr.Google Scholar
  69. Tyler, T. (2007). Procedural Justice and the Courts. Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 44(1/2), 26–31. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ajacourtreview/217/.
  70. Tyler, T. (1988). What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22(1), 103–135.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3053563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys. (2013). United States attorneys’ annual statistic report: Fiscal Report 2013. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao/legacy/2014/09/22/13statrpt.pdf.
  72. Ulmer, J., & Bradley, M. (2006). Variation in trial penalties among serious violent offenses. Criminology, 44, 631–670.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00059.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Viljoen, J., Klaver, J., & Roesch, R. (2005). Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals. Law and Human Behavior, 29(3), 253–277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-3613-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Washington, Jr. v. Murray. (1993). Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Thompson, Warden, Mecklenburg State Correctional Facility, 4 F.3d 1285 4th Cir.Google Scholar
  75. West, E. M. (2010). Court findings of ineffective assistance of counsel claims in post-conviction appeals among first 255 dna exoneration cases. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Innocence_Project_IAC_Report.pdf.
  76. Zatz, M. S. (1984). Race, ethnicity, and determinate sentencing: A new dimension to an old controversy. Criminology, 22, 147–171.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00294.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology & Criminal JusticePortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Criminology & LawUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations