Advertisement

Biorefinery pp 695-713 | Cite as

Factors Affecting Seawater-Based Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Date Palm Residues

  • Chuanji Fang
  • Mette Hedegaard Thomsen
  • Christian Grundahl Frankær
  • Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-OyanedelEmail author
  • Grzegorz Przemyslaw Brudecki
  • Jens Ejbye Schmidt
Chapter

Abstract

Seawater-based pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass is an innovative process at research stage. With respect to process optimization, factors affecting seawater-based pretreatment of lignocellulosic date palm residues were studied for the first time in this paper. Pretreatment temperature (180–210 °C), salinity of seawater (0–50 ppt), and catalysts (H2SO4, Na2CO3, and NaOH) were investigated. The results showed that pretreatment temperature exerted the largest influence on seawater-based pretreatment in terms of the enzymatic digestibility and fermentability of pretreated solids and the inhibition of pretreatment liquids to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Salinity showed the least impact to seawater-based pretreatment, which widens the application spectrum of saline water sources such as brines discharged in desalination plant. Sulfuric acid was the most effective catalyst for seawater-based pretreatment compared with Na2CO3 and NaOH.

Keywords

Biorefinery Seawater Pretreatment Lignocellulosic biomass Date palm residues 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Cooperative Agreement between the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology (Masdar Institute), Abu Dhabi, UAE and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA—Reference 02/MI/MI/CP/11/07633/GEN/G/00.

References

  1. Amarasekara AS, Ebede CC (2009) Zinc chloride mediated degradation of cellulose at 200 °C and identification of the products. Bioresour Technol 100:5301–5304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashraf MT, Fang C, Bochenski T, Cybulska I, Alassali A, Sowunmi A, Farzanah R, Brudecki GP, Chaturvedi T, Haris S, Schmidt JE, Thomsen MH (2016) Estimation of bioenergy potential for local biomass in the United Arab Emirates. Emirates J Food Agric 28:99–106.  https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2015-04-060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastidas-Oyanedel J-R, Fang C, Almardeai S, Javid U, Yousuf A, Schmidt JE (2016) Waste biorefinery in arid/semi-arid regions. Bioresour Technol 215:21–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen W-H, Tu Y-J, Sheen H-K (2011) Disruption of sugarcane bagasse lignocellulosic structure by means of dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment with microwave-assisted heating. Appl Energy 88:2726–2734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.02.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Stevens MA, Zhu Y, Holmes J, Xu H (2013) Understanding of alkaline pretreatment parameters for corn stover enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cybulska I, Chaturvedi T, Brudecki GP, Kádár Z, Meyer AS, Baldwin RM, Thomsen MH (2014) Chemical characterization and hydrothermal pretreatment of Salicornia bigelovii straw for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis and bioethanol potential. Bioresour Technol 153:165–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. da Costa Sousa L, Jin M, Chundawat SPS, Bokade V, Tang X, Azarpira A, Lu F, Avci U, Humpula J, Uppugundla N, Gunawan C, Pattathil S, Cheh AM, Kothari N, Kumar R, Ralph J, Hahn MG, Wyman CE, Singh S, Simmons BA, Dale BE, Balan V (2016) Next-generation ammonia pretreatment enhances cellulosic biofuel production. Energy Environ Sci 9:1215–1223.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE03051JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Figueiredo LP, Ferreira FF (2014) The Rietveld method as a tool to quantify the amorphous amount of microcrystalline cellulose. J Pharm Sci 103:1394–1399.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Domínguez de María P (2013) On the use of seawater as reaction media for large-scale applications in biorefineries. ChemCatChem 5:1643–1648.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201200877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang C, Schmidt JE, Cybulska I, Brudecki GP, Frankær CG, Thomsen MH (2015a) Hydrothermal pretreatment of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) leaflets and rachis to enhance enzymatic digestibility and bioethanol potential. Biomed Res Int 2015:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/216454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang C, Thomsen MH, Brudecki GP, Cybulska I, Frankaer CG, Bastidas-Oyanedel J-R, Schmidt JE (2015b) Seawater as alternative to freshwater in pretreatment of date palm residues for bioethanol production in coastal and/or arid areas. ChemSusChem 8:3823–3831.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201501116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grande PM, Domínguez de María P (2012) Enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose in concentrated seawater. Bioresour Technol 104:799–802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harun R, Jason WSY, Cherrington T, Danquah MK (2011) Exploring alkaline pre-treatment of microalgal biomass for bioethanol production. Appl Energy 88:3464–3467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hongsiri W, Danon B, de Jong W (2015) The effects of combined catalysis of oxalic acid and seawater on the kinetics of xylose and arabinose dehydration to furfural. Int J Energy Environ Eng 6:21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-014-0146-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hongsiri W, Danon B, De Jong W (2014) Kinetic study on the dilute acidic dehydration of pentoses toward furfural in seawater. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:5455–5463.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie404374yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang H, Guo X, Li D, Liu M, Wu J, Ren H (2011) Identification of crucial yeast inhibitors in bio-ethanol and improvement of fermentation at high pH and high total solids. Bioresour Technol 102:7486–7493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hussin MH, Rahim AA, Mohamad Ibrahim MN, Brosse N (2013) Physicochemical characterization of alkaline and ethanol organosolv lignins from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) fronds as phenol substitutes for green material applications. Ind Crop Prod 49:23–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiang W, Chang S, Qu Y, Zhang Z, Xu J (2016) Changes on structural properties of biomass pretreated by combined deacetylation with liquid hot water and its effect on enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 220:448–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ko JK, Kim Y, Ximenes E, Ladisch MR (2014) Effect of liquid hot water pretreatment severity on properties of hardwood lignin and enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 112:252–262.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar R, Mago G, Balan V, Wyman CE (2009) Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 100:3948–3962.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li H, Pu Y, Kumar R, Ragauskas AJ, Wyman CE (2014) Investigation of lignin deposition on cellulose during hydrothermal pretreatment, its effect on cellulose hydrolysis, and underlying mechanisms. Biotechnol Bioeng 111:485–492.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin CSK, Luque R, Clark JH, Webb C, Du C (2011) A seawater-based biorefining strategy for fermentative production and chemical transformations of succinic acid. Energy Environ Sci 4:1471–1479.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00666aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu C, Wyman CE (2006) The enhancement of xylose monomer and xylotriose degradation by inorganic salts in aqueous solutions at 180 °C. Carbohydr Res 341:2550–2556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2006.07.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu L, Sun J, Cai C, Wang S, Pei H, Zhang J (2009a) Corn stover pretreatment by inorganic salts and its effects on hemicellulose and cellulose degradation. Bioresour Technol 100:5865–5871.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu L, Sun J, Li M, Wang S, Pei H, Zhang J (2009b) Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis and structural features of corn stover by FeCl3 pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 100:5853–5858.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loow Y-L, Wu TY, Lim YS, Tan KA, Siow LF, Jahim JM, Mohammad AW (2017) Improvement of xylose recovery from the stalks of oil palm fronds using inorganic salt and oxidative agent. Energy Convers Manag 138:248–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loow Y-L, Wu TY, Jamaliah Md. J, Mohammad AW, Teoh WH (2016) Typical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into reducing sugars using dilute acid hydrolysis and alkaline pretreatment. Cellulose 23:1491–1520.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0936-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loow YL, Wu TY, Tan KA, Lim YS, Siow LF, Md. Jahim J, Mohammad AW, Teoh WH (2015) Recent advances in the application of inorganic salt pretreatment for transforming lignocellulosic biomass into reducing sugars. J Agric Food Chem 63:8349–8363.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mao L, Zhang L, Gao N, Li A (2013) Seawater-based furfural production via corncob hydrolysis catalyzed by FeCl3 in acetic acid steam. Green Chem 15:727.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2gc36346aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marcotullio G, Krisanti E, Giuntoli J, de Jong W (2011) Selective production of hemicellulose-derived carbohydrates from wheat straw using dilute HCl or FeCl3 solutions under mild conditions. X-ray and thermo-gravimetric analysis of the solid residues. Bioresour Technol 102:5917–5923.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nguyen Q, Tucker M (2002) Dilute acid/metal salt hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. US Patent 6,423,145Google Scholar
  32. Nishiyama Y, Sugiyama J, Chanzy H, Langan P (2003) Crystal structure and hydrogen bonding system in cellulose Iα from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 125:14300–14306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nitsos CK, Matis KA, Triantafyllidis KS (2013) Optimization of hydrothermal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass in the bioethanol production process. ChemSusChem 6:110–122.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201200546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peng L, Lin L, Zhang J, Zhuang J, Zhang B, Gong Y (2010) Catalytic conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid by metal chlorides. Molecules 15:5258–5272.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15085258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pu Y, Hu F, Huang F, Davison BH, Ragauskas AJ (2013) Assessing the molecular structure basis for biomass recalcitrance during dilute acid and hydrothermal pretreatments. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Young RA (1995) Introduction to the Rietveld method. In: Young RA (ed) The Rietveld method. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–39Google Scholar
  37. Ren H, Zong M-H, Wu H, Li N (2016) Utilization of seawater for the biorefinery of lignocellulosic biomass: ionic liquid pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and microbial lipid production. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:5659–5666.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Román-Leshkov Y, Davis ME (2011) Activation of carbonyl-containing molecules with solid Lewis acids in aqueous media. ACS Catal 1:1566–1580.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cs200411dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Selig MJ, Weiss N, Ji Y (2008) Enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden. NREL/TP-510-42629Google Scholar
  40. Singh S, Cheng G, Sathitsuksanoh N, Wu D, Varanasi P, George A, Balan V, Gao X, Kumar R, Dale BE, Wyman CE, Simmons BA (2015) Comparison of different biomass pretreatment techniques and their impact on chemistry and structure. Front Energy Res 2:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2014.00062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz RO, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2011) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden. NREL/TP-510-42618Google Scholar
  42. Thygesen A, Oddershede J, Lilholt H, Thomsen AB, Ståhl K (2005) On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 12:563–576.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-005-9001-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trajano HL, Engle NL, Foston M, Ragauskas AJ, Tschaplinski TJ, Wyman CE (2013) The fate of lignin during hydrothermal pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:110.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu M, Chiu Y (2011) Consumptive water use in the production of ethanol and petroleum gasoline-2011 updated. Argonne National Laboratory, LemontGoogle Scholar
  45. Zeng Y, Zhao S, Yang S, Ding S-Y (2014) Lignin plays a negative role in the biochemical process for producing lignocellulosic biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 27:38–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang J, Tang M, Viikari L (2012) Xylans inhibit enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials by cellulases. Bioresour Technol 121:8–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang L, Yu H, Wang P, Li Y (2014) Production of furfural from xylose, xylan and corncob in gamma-valerolactone using FeCl3·6H2O as catalyst. Bioresour Technol 151:355–360.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhao H (2005) Effect of ions and other compatible solutes on enzyme activity, and its implication for biocatalysis using ionic liquids. J Mol Catal B Enzym 37:16–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2005.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao X, Zhang L, Liu D (2012) Biomass recalcitrance. Part I: the chemical compositions and physical structures affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 6:465–482.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhu L, O’Dwyer JP, Chang VS, Granda CB, Holtzapple MT (2008) Structural features affecting biomass enzymatic digestibility. Bioresour Technol 99:3817–3828.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chuanji Fang
    • 1
  • Mette Hedegaard Thomsen
    • 2
  • Christian Grundahl Frankær
    • 3
  • Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-Oyanedel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Grzegorz Przemyslaw Brudecki
    • 1
  • Jens Ejbye Schmidt
    • 4
  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DepartmentKhalifa University of Science and Technology, Masdar InstituteMasdar CityUnited Arab Emirates
  2. 2.Department of Energy TechnologyAalborg UniversityEsbjergDenmark
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of CopenhagenKøbenhavn ØDenmark
  4. 4.SDU-Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology, and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark

Personalised recommendations