Advertisement

If You Change the Way You Look at Things, Things You Look at Change. Max Planck’s Challenge for Health, Health Care, and the Healthcare System

  • Joachim P. Sturmberg
Chapter

Abstract

Max Planck observed that ‘If you change the way you look at things, things you look at change’. It is high time for healthcare professionals to embrace the challenge—the linear reductionist view of health and disease is failing our patients, our profession and our societies. These insights are not really new, Osler has coined many aphorisms to emphasise the need to understand the person with an illness over and above the diseases that might be responsible for his predicament.

This chapter looks at health, health care and the healthcare system from a complex adaptive systems perspective—health is a subjective adaptive state, health care ought to aim at improving or at least maintaining the experience of health, and the health system ought to provide an integrated framework so that health for all can emerge. Looking at health, health care and the health system from the multiple dimensions spanning basic physiology and its networks to the organisational levels with the power to create an environment in which individuals can achieve their health potentials indeed makes ‘things we look at change’.

References

  1. 1.
    White K, Williams F, Greenberg B. The ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1961;265(18):885–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Green L, Fryer G, Yawn B, Lanier D, Dovey S. The ecology of medical care revisited. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(26):2021–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johansen ME, Kircher SM, Huerta TR. Reexamining the ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(5):495–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braun RN. Die gezielte Diagnostik in der Praxis. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1957.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fink W, Kipatov V, Konitzer M. Diagnoses by general practitioners: accuracy and reliability. Int J Forecasting. 2009;25(4):784–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Britt H, Miller G, Henderson J, Charles J, Valenti L, Harrison C, Bayram C, Zhang C, Pollack A, O’Halloran J, Pan Y. General practice activity in Australia 2011–12. Sydney: 2012 Contract No.: General Practice Series No. 31.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sturmberg JP. Health: a personal complex-adaptive state. In: Sturmberg JP, Martin CM, editors. Handbook of systems and complexity in health. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 231–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sturmberg JP. The personal nature of health. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(4):766–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sturmberg JP. Person-centeredness - a paradigm shift for health care? From disease as a “structural problem” to health, illness and disease as the “emergent outcomes of complex adaptive physiological network function”. In: Loughlin M, editor. Person Centred Care: the new Professionalism. Understanding the Philosopy. 2019: (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mackenbach JP. Carl von Linne, Thomas McKeown, and the inadequacy of disease classifications. Eur J Pub Health. 2004;14(3):225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Macklem PT, Seely A. Towards a definition of life. Perspect Biol Med. 2010;53(3):330–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Que C-L, Kenyon CM, Olivenstein R, Macklem PT, Maksym GN. Homeokinesis and short-term variability of human airway caliber. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91(3):1131–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sturmberg JP, Bennett JM, Picard M, Seely AJE. The trajectory of life. Decreasing physiological network complexity through changing fractal patterns. Front Physiol. 2015;6:169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goh K-I, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabási A-L. The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104(21):8685–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heng HH. Heterogeneity-mediated cellular adaptation and its trade-off: searching for the general principles of diseases. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(1):233–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tracey KJ. Physiology and immunology of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(2):289–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005;5:243–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cole SW. Social regulation of human gene expression: mechanisms and implications for public health. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(S1):S84–S92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wallace DC. A mitochondrial bioenergetic etiology of disease. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(4):1405–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Picard M, Juster R-P, McEwen BS. Mitochondrial allostatic load puts the ‘gluc’ back in glucocorticoids. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(5):303–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaur H, Carvalho J, Looso M, Singh P, Chennupati R, Preussner J, Günther S, Albarrán-Jurez J, Tischner D, Classen S, Offermanns S, Wettschureck N. Single-cell profiling reveals heterogeneity and functional patterning of GPCR expression in the vascular system. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Luo C, Keown CL, Kurihara L, Zhou J, He Y, Li J, Castanon R, Lucero J, Nery JR, Sandoval JP, Bui B, Sejnowski TJ, Harkins TT, Mukamel EA, Behrens MM, Ecker JR. Single-cell methylomes identify neuronal subtypes and regulatory elements in mammalian cortex. Science. 2017;357(6351):600–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heng HH. Debating cancer: the paradox in cancer research. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing; 2016.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karatoreos IN, McEwen BS. Annual research review: the neurobiology and physiology of resilience and adaptation across the life course. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(4):337–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Antonovsky A. Health, stress and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1979.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Antonovsky A. Complexity, conflict, chaos, coherence, coercion and civility. Soc Sci Med. 1993;37(8):969–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rohleder NP. Stimulation of systemic low-grade inflammation by psychosocial stress. Psychosom Med. 2014;76(3):181–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wolf JM, Rohleder N, Bierhaus A, Nawroth PP, Kirschbaum C. Determinants of the NF-κB response to acute psychosocial stress in humans. Brain Behav Immun. 2009;23(6):742–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bierhaus A, Wolf J, Andrassy M, Rohleder N, Humpert PM, Petrov D, Ferstl R, von Eynatten M, Wendt T, Rudofsky G, Joswig M, Morcos M, Schwaninger M, McEwen B, Kirschbaum C, Nawroth PP. A mechanism converting psychosocial stress into mononuclear cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(4):1920–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rohleder N, Marin TJ, Ma R, Miller GE. Biologic cost of caring for a cancer patient: dysregulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(18):2909–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Doyle WJ, Miller GE, Frank E, Rabin BS, Turner RB. Chronic stress, glucocorticoid receptor resistance, inflammation, and disease risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(16):5995–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Picard M, McEwen BS. Psychological stress and mitochondria: a conceptual framework. Psychosom Med. 2018;80(2):126–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Picard M, McEwen BS. Mitochondria impact brain function and cognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(1):7–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Naik E, Dixit VM. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species drive proinflammatory cytokine production. J Exp Med. 2011;208(3):417–20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barabási A-L. Network medicine - from obesity to the “diseasome”. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(4):404–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sturmberg JP, Bennett JM, Martin CM, Picard M. ‘Multimorbidity’ as the manifestation of network disturbances. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(1):199–208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sturmberg JP, Picard M, Aron DC, Bennett JM, Bircher J, deHaven MJ, Gijzel SMW, Heng HH, Marcum JA, Martin CM, Miles A, Peterson CL, Rohleder N, Walker C, Rikkert MGMO, Melis RJF. Health and disease - how network physiology integrates the social and biological determinants of health. A framework for debate. Front Med. 2019;6:59.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bennett JM, Reeves G, Billman G, Sturmberg JP. Inflammation, the body’s only efficient way to respond to injuries: implications for clinical care of chronic diseases. Front Med. 2018;(5):316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sterling P, Eyer J. Allostasis: a new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. In: Fisher S, Reason J, editors. Handbook of life stress, cognition and health. New York: Wiley; 1988. p. 629–49.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    McEwen BS. Stress, adaptation, and disease: allostasis and allostatic load. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;840(1):33–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    McEwen B. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators: central role of the brain. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2006;8(4):367–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    McEwen B. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators: central role of the brain. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2006;8(4):367–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Edes AN, Crews DE. Allostatic load and biological anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017;162(S63):e23146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Juster R-P, McEwen BS, Lupien SJ. Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;35(1):2–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Read S, Grundy E. Allostatic load - a challenge to measure multisystem physiological dysregulation. National Centre for Research Methods Working Paper 04/12; 2012. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2879/1/NCRM_workingpaper_0412.pdf.
  47. 47.
    Loucks EB, Juster RP, Pruessner JC. Neuroendocrine biomarkers, allostatic load, and the challenge of measurement: a commentary on Gersten. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(3):525–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Robertson T, Beveridge G, Bromley C. Allostatic load as a predictor of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general population: evidence from the Scottish health survey. PLos One. 2017;12(8):e0183297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wiley JFP, Gruenewald TLP, Karlamangla ASMDP, Seeman TEP. Modeling multisystem physiological dysregulation. Psychosom Med. 2016;78(3):290–301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Arbeev KG, Ukraintseva SV, Bagley O, Zhbannikov IY, Cohen AA, Kulminski AM, Yashin AI. “Physiological dysregulation” as a promising measure of robustness and resilience in studies of aging and a new indicator of preclinical disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly136.
  51. 51.
    Seeman TE, McEwen BS, Rowe JW, Singer BH. Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(8): 4770–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Seeman TE, Crimmins E, Huang M-H, Singer B, Bucur A, Gruenewald T, Berkman LF, Reuben DB. Cumulative biological risk and socio-economic differences in mortality: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(10):1985–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lakoff G, Johnsen M. Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pellegrino E, Thomasma D. A philosophical basis of medical practice. Towards a philosophy and ethic of the healing professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    McWhinney IR. An acquaintance with particulars …. Fam Med. 1989;21(4):296–8.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    McWhinney IR. Being a GP - what it means. WONCA 2000. 2000 05-07-2000. p. 4.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hart JT. Expectations of health care: promoted, managed or shared? Health Expect. 1998;1(1):3–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152(9):1423–33.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Matusitz J, Spear J. Effective doctor-patient communication: an updated examination. Social Work in Public Health. 2014;29(3):252–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Singh Ospina N, Phillips KA, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Castaneda-Guarderas A, Gionfriddo MR, Branda ME, Montori VM. Eliciting the patient’s agenda - secondary analysis of recorded clinical encounters. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:36–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Davis F. The cabdriver and his fare: facets of a fleeting relationship. Am J Sociol. 1959;65(2):158–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    McKinlay JB, Marceau LD. The end of the golden age of doctoring. Int J Health Serv. 2002;32(2):379–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Osorio JH. Evolution and changes in the physician-patient relationship. Colomb Méd. 2011;42:400–5.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, for Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Board on health care services. In: Institute of Medicine, editors. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington: The National Academics Press; 2011. Available at http://nap.edu/13058.
  65. 65.
    Samanta A, Mello MM, Foster C, Tingle J, Samanta J. The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: a shift from the BOLAM standard? Med Law Rev. 2006;14(3):321–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lenzer J. Why we can’t trust clinical guidelines. Br Med J. 2013;346:f3830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Fleming T, DeMets D. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:605–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Institute of Medicine. Evaluation of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in chronic disease. Washington: The National Academies Press (Institute of Medicine); 2010.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Moynihan R. Surrogates under scrutiny: fallible correlations, fatal consequences. Br Med J. 2011;343:d5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Fleming TR, Powers JH. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials. Stat Med. 2012;31(25):2973–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Weintraub WS, Lüscher TF, Pocock S. The perils of surrogate endpoints. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(33):2212–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Krumholz HM, Lee TH. Redefining quality - implications of recent clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2537–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kemp R, Prasad V. Surrogate endpoints in oncology: when are they acceptable for regulatory and clinical decisions, and are they currently overused? BMC Med. 2017;15(1):134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Yudkin JS, Lipska KJ, Montori VM. The idolatry of the surrogate. Br Med J. 2011;343:d7995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Mercuri M, Sherbino J, Sedran RJ, Frank J, Gafni A, Norman GP. When guidelines don’t guide: the effect of patient context on management decisions based on clinical practice guidelines. Acad Med. 2015;90(2):191–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Weisz G, Cambrosio A, Keating P, Knaapen L, Schlich T, Tournay VJ. The emergence of clinical practice guidelines. Milbank Q. 2007;85(4):691–727.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rosenberg CE. Disease in history: frames and framers. Milbank Q. 1989;67(Suppl 1):1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Brown P. Naming and framing: the social construction of diagnosis and illness. J Health Soc Behav. 1995;35(Extra Issue):34–52.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Aronowitz RA. When do symptoms become a disease? Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(9(pt 2)):803–308.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Rosenberg CE. The tyranny of diagnosis: specific entities and individual experience. Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):237–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Moynihan R, Heath I, Henry D. Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering. Br Med J. 2002;324:886–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Rosenberg CE. What is disease? In memory of Owsei Temkin. Bull Hist Med. 2003;77(3):491–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Sturmberg JP, Martin CM. Diagnosis - the limiting focus of taxonomy. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22(1):103–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Manrai AK, Patel CJ, Ioannidis JA. In the era of precision medicine and big data, who is normal? JAMA. 2018;319(19):1981–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wood LD, Parsons DW, Jones S, Lin J, Sjoblom T, Leary RJ, Shen D, Boca SM, Barber T, Ptak J, Silliman N, Szabo S, Dezso Z, Ustyanksky V, Nikolskaya T, Nikolsky Y, Karchin R, Wilson PA, Kaminker JS, Zhang Z, Croshaw R, Willis J, Dawson D, Shipitsin M, Willson JKV, Sukumar S, Polyak K, Park BH, Pethiyagoda CL, Pant PVK, Ballinger DG, Sparks AB, Hartigan J, Smith DR, Suh E, Papadopoulos N, Buckhaults P, Markowitz SD, Parmigiani G, Kinzler KW, Velculescu VE, Vogelstein B. The genomic landscapes of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science. 2007;318(5853):1108–13.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Heng HHQ. Cancer genome sequencing: the challenges ahead. Bioessays. 2007;29(8): 783–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Faber R, Baumert M, Stepan H, Wessel N, Voss A, Walther T. Baroreflex sensitivity, heart rate, and blood pressure variability in hypertensive pregnancy disorders. J Hum Hypertens. 2004;18:707.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Mussalo H, Vanninen E, Ikäheimo R, Laitinen T, Hartikainen J. Short-term blood pressure variability in renovascular hypertension and in severe and mild essential hypertension. Clin Sci. 2003;105(5):609–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Kario K. Blood pressure variability in hypertension. A possible cardiovascular risk factor. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17(11):1075–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Rothwell PM. Limitations of the usual blood-pressure hypothesis and importance of variability, instability, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010;375(9718):938–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Mehlum MH, Liestøl K, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Hua TA, Rothwell PM, Mancia G, Parati G, Weber MA, Berge E. Blood pressure variability and risk of cardiovascular events and death in patients with hypertension and different baseline risks. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(24):2243–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Jun JE, Jin S-M, Baek J, Oh S, Hur KY, Lee M-S, Lee M-K, Kim JH. The association between glycemic variability and diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14(1):70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hirsch IB. Glycemic variability and diabetes complications: does it matter? Of course it does! Diabetes Care. 2015;38(8):1610–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Kanis JA, Odén A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl DA, Cooper C, on behalf of IOF Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(9):2239–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Aussem A, Caille P, Klemm Z, Gasse M, Anne-MarieSchott, Ducher M. Analysis of risk factors of hip fracture with causal Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings IWBBIO. Granada: Copicentro 2014. p. 1074–85.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Russ TC, Gatz M, Pedersen NL, Hannah J, Wyper G, Batty GD, Deary IJ, Starr JM. Geographical variation in dementia: examining the role of environmental factors in Sweden and Scotland. Epidemiology. 2015;26(2):263–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Caillet P, Klemm S, Ducher M, Aussem A, Schott A-M. Hip fracture in the elderly: a re-analysis of the EPIDOS study with causal Bayesian networks. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Stopford CL, Snowden JS, Thompson JC, Neary D. Variability in cognitive presentation of Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex. 2008;44(2):185–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Tractenberg RE, Pietrzak RH. Intra-individual variability in Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive aging: definitions, context, and effect sizes. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e16973.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Tarnanas I, Tsolaki A, Wiederhold M, Wiederhold B, Tsolaki M. Five-year biomarker progression variability for Alzheimer’s disease dementia prediction: can a complex instrumental activities of daily living marker fill in the gaps? Alzheimers Dement Diagn Assessment Dis Monit. 2015;1(4):521–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Zolochevska O, Bjorklund N, Woltjer R, Wiktorowicz J, Taglialatela G. Postsynaptic proteome of non-demented individuals with Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180179.
  102. 102.
    Sturmberg J, Topolski S. For every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple and wrong. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(5):1017–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Mittra I. The disconnection between tumor response and survival. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007;4(4):203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Leyvraz S, Pampallona S, Martinelli G, Ploner F, Perey L, Aversa S, Peters S, Brunsvig P, Montes A, Lange A, Yilmaz U, Rosti G, On behalf of the Solid Tumors Working Party of the European Group for B and Marrow T. A threefold dose intensity treatment with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide for patients with small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(8):533–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2545–59.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Hemmingsen B, Lund SS, Gluud C, Vaag A, Almdal T, Hemmingsen C, Wetterslev J. Intensive glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials. Br Med J. 2011;343:d6898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Simmons RK, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Sharp SJ, Sargeant LA, Williams KM, Prevost AT, Kinmonth AL, Wareham NJ, Griffin SJ. Screening for type 2 diabetes and population mortality over 10 years (ADDITION-Cambridge): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9855):1741–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Sim JJ, Shi J, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Jacobsen SJ. Impact of achieved blood pressures on mortality risk and end-stage renal disease among a large, diverse hypertension population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(6):588–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Musini V, Gueyffier F, Puil L, Salzwedel D, Wright J. Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in adults aged 18 to 59 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8:CD008276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Gorricho J, Garjón J, Celaya M, Muruzába lL, Malón M, Montoya R, López A. Blood pressure targets for the treatment of people with hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;10:CD010315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Ioannidis JA. Diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines and in the real world. JAMA. 2018;319:115–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Han BH, Sutin D, Williamson JD, Davis BR, Piller LB, Pervin H, Pressel SL, Blaum CS, on behalf of the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Effect of statin treatment vs usual care on primary cardiovascular prevention among older adults: the ALLHAT-LLT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:955–965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Garrison S, Kolber M, Korownyk C, McCracken R, Heran B, Allan G. Blood pressure targets for hypertension in older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8:CD011575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Sturmberg J. Hype and tension in hypertension. Debating the latest hypertension guidelines. Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2018;6(1):128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Heath I. Combating disease mongering: daunting but nonetheless essential. PLoS Med. 2006;3(4):e146. Available at www.plosmedicine.org.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Black W. Advances in radiology and the real versus apparent effects of early diagnosis. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27(2):116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):605–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Moynihan R, Doust J, Henry D. Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy. Br Med J. 2012;344:19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Yver M. Surgical pathology in cancer diagnosis: implications for quaternary prevention. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2015;10(35):7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Moynihan R, Nickel B, Hersch J, Beller E, Doust J, Compton S, Barratt A, Bero L, McCaffery K. Public opinions about overdiagnosis: a national community survey. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Welch HG, Fisher ES. Income and cancer overdiagnosis - when too much care is harmful. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2208–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Herndon MB, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Implications of expanding disease definitions: the case of osteoporosis. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(6):1702–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Moynihan R, Doran E, Henry D. Disease mongering is now part of the global health debate. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Drugwatch. Disease mongering and drug marketing. 2018. https://www.drugwatch.com/news/2012/01/22/disease-mongering-and-drug-marketing/.
  125. 125.
    Wolinsky H. Disease mongering and drug marketing. EMBO Rep. 2005;6(7):612–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Brezis M. Big pharma and health care: unsolvable conflict of interests between private enterprise and public health. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2008;45(2):83–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Prasad V, Cifu A, Ioannidis JPA. Reversals of established medical practices. evidence to abandon ship. JAMA. 2012;307(1):37–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Prasad V. Powering cancer screening for overall mortality. ecancermedicalscience. 2013;7:ed27. https://ecancer.org/journal/editorial/27-powering-cancer-screening-for-overall-mortality.php.
  129. 129.
    Prasad V, Lenzer J, Newman DH. Why cancer screening has never been shown to “save lives”—and what we can do about it. Br Med J. 2016;352:h6080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Jacklyn G, Bell K, Hayen A. Assessing the efficacy of cancer screening. Public Health Res Pract. 2017;27(3):e2731727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
  132. 132.
    Health Workforce Australia. Australia’s future health workforce - nurses detailed. Canberra: Department of Health; 2014.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Sturmberg JP, M O’Halloran D, McDonnell G, M Martin C. General practice work and workforce. Aust J Gen Pract. 2018;47:507–13.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Sturmberg JP, O’Halloran DM, Martin CM. People at the centre of complex adaptive health systems reform. Med J Aust. 2010;193(8):474–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Sturmberg JP, O’Halloran DM, Martin CM. Health care reform - the need for a complex adaptive systems approach. In: Sturmberg JP, Martin CM, editors. Handbook of systems and complexity in health. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 827–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Adler KG. Does high patient satisfaction mean high quality of care? Fam Pract Manag. 2016;23(3):4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Kupfer JM, Bond EU. Patient satisfaction and patient-centered care: necessary but not equal. JAMA. 2012;308(2):139–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Enguidanos ER, Coletti CM, Honigman L, Mazzeo A, Pinson TB, Reed K, Wiler JL. Patient satisfaction surveys and quality of care: an information paper. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(4):351–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Dunsch F, Evans DK, Macis M, Wang Q. Bias in patient satisfaction surveys: a threat to measuring healthcare quality. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3(2):e000694.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Howie J, Heaney D, Maxwell M, Walker J. A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care. Fam Pract. 1998;15:165–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Porter ME, Larsson S, Lee TH. Standardizing patient outcomes measurement. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(6):504–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Sepucha KR, Levin CA, Uzogara EE, Barry MJ, O’Connor AM, Mulley AG. Developing instruments to measure the quality of decisions: early results for a set of symptom-driven decisions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):504–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Lee CN, Dominik R, Levin CA, Barry MJ, Cosenza C, O’Connor AM, Mulley Jr AG, Sepucha KR. Development of instruments to measure the quality of breast cancer treatment decisions. Health Expect. 2010;13(3):258–72.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Annas GJ. Reframing the debate on health care reform by replacing our metaphors. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(11):745–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Starfield B. Is US health really the best in the world? JAMA. 2000;284(4):483–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Macinko J, Starfield B, Shi L. The contribution of primary care systems to health outcomes within Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, 1970–1998. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(3):831–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Macinko J, Starfield B, Shi L. Quantifying the health benefits of primary care physician supply in the United States. Int J Health Serv. 2007;37(1):111–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Hart J. The inverse care law. Lancet. 1971;I:405–12.Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Katerndahl DA, Wood R, Jaen CR. A method for estimating relative complexity of ambulatory care. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(4):341–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Fortin M, Dionne J, Pinho G, Gignac J, Almirall J, Lapointe L. Randomized controlled trials: do they have external validity for patients with multiple comorbidities? Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(2):104–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Kahn R, Ninomiya J, Griffith J. Profiling care provided by different groups of physicians: effects of patient case-mix (Bias) and physician-level clustering on quality assessment results. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:111–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Greenfield S, Rogers W, Mangotich M, Carney M, Tarlov A. Outcomes of patients with hypertension and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus treated by different systems and specialties. JAMA. 1995;274(18):1436–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Scott JG. Complexities of the consultation. In: Sturmberg JP, Martin CM, editors. Handbook of systems and complexity in health. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 257–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Hjortdahl P. Continuity of care: general practitioners’ knowledge about, and sense of responsibility toward their patients. Fam Pract. 1992;9(1):3–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Fugelli P. Trust - in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(468):575–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Freeman G, Olesen F, Hjortdahl P. Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice? Fam Pract. 2003;20(6):623–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Hjortdahl P. The influence of general practitioners’ knowledge about their patients on the clinical decision-making process. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992;10:290–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Sturmberg JP, Schattner P. Personal doctoring. Its impact on continuity of care as measured by the comprehensiveness of care score. Aust Fam Physician. 2001;30(5):513–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Saultz JW, Lochner J. Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(2):159–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Guthrie B, Saultz JW, Freeman GK, Haggerty JL. Continuity of care matters. Br Med J. 2008;337(aug07_1):a867.Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Sweeney K, Gray D. Patients who do not receive continuity of care from their general practitioner - are they a vulnerable group? Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45:133–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Sturmberg JP. Health system redesign. How to make health care person-centered, equitable, and sustainable. Cham: Springer; 2017.Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Sturmberg JP, Martin CM. The dynamics of health care reform - learning from a complex adaptive systems theoretical perspective. Nonlinear Dynam Psych Life Sci. 2010;14(4): 525–40.Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    Ellis GFR. Top-down causation and emergence: some comments on mechanisms. Interface Focus. 2012;2(1):126–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Rothman KJ. Causes. Am J Epidemiol. 1976;104(6):587–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim P. Sturmberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of NewcastleWamberalAustralia
  2. 2.International Society for Systems and Complexity Sciences for HealthWaitsfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations