Advertisement

Understanding and Fostering Collective Ideation: An Improvisation-Based Method

  • Anna-Maija Nisula
  • Kirsimarja Blomqvist
Chapter
Part of the Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning book series (IAKM, volume 7)

Abstract

Although the collective view is receiving increasing attention in research, this perspective is missing from the approaches for fostering creativity and ideation. The present study aims to fill this research gap by understanding ideation as a collective phenomenon and by introducing a novel method for fostering collective ideation. The study builds on current research on knowledge creation, collective creativity, idea generation, and collective theatrical improvisation to introduce an approach for fostering collective ideation. In addition, as a secondary goal, the study provides empirical findings about the implementation of collective ideation in 13 distinct cases. The study builds links between knowledge creation and collective theatrical improvisation and, thus, highlights social and affective aspects of collective ideation as a knowledge creation.

Keywords

Ideation Collective ideation Idea generation Knowledge creation Collective improvisation Theatrical improvisation 

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37(2), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakeman, R., & Beck, S. (1974). The size of informal groups in public. Environment and Behavior, 6(3), 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bantel, K., & Jackson, S. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry, D., & Meisiek, S. (2010). Seeing more and seeing differently: Sensemaking, mindfulness, and the workarts. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1505–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartunek, J., Gordon, J., & Weathersby, R. (1983). Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 273–284.Google Scholar
  7. Björk, J. (2012). Knowledge domain spanners in ideation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Björk, J., Magnusson, M., Sukhov, A., Magnusson, P., & Olsson, L. E. (2016). The what, who, when, where, and how of idea assessment. Paper presented at the ISPIM Innovation Forum, Boston, MA, USA on 13–16 March, 2016.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, V., Tumeo, M., Larey, T., & Paulus, P. (1998). Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29(4), 495–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Catmull, E. (2008). How Pixar fosters collective creativity. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  11. Choi, J., Sung, S., & Cho, T. (2014). Creative contribution of individuals in groups: Effects of goal orientation and participative safety. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(3), 407–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1994). Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Science, 40(2), 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook, S., & Brown, J. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Toward a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 6(2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (p. 313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Denzin, N. L., & Lincoln, Y. Y. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dodgson, M., Salter, A., & Gann, D. (2005). Think, play, do. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Drazin, R., Glynn, M., & Kazanjian, R. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (2003). Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 283–301.Google Scholar
  23. Erden, Z., Von Krogh, G., & Nonaka, I. (2008). The quality of group tacit knowledge. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(1), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2015). Qualitative methods in business research: A practical guide to social research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Fisher, E. P. (1992). The impact of play on development: A meta-analysis. Play & Culture, 5(2), 159–181.Google Scholar
  26. Gadamer, H. (1989). Play as the clue to ontological explanation. Truth and method, crossroad. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  27. Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grawitch, M., Munz, D., & Kramer, T. (2003). Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(1), 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guzzo, R., & Dickson, M. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 307–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hammond, M., Neff, N., Farr, J., Schwall, A., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Handzic, M., & Chaimungkalanont, M. (2004, December). Enhancing organisational creativity through socialisation. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(1), 57–64.Google Scholar
  32. Hargadon, A. B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hargadon, A., & Bechky, B. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to “be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores 1. Journal of Personality, 43(3), 434–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harrison, D., & Klein, K. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harvey, S. (2013). A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 822–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harvey, S., & Kou, C. (2013). Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3), 346–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2009). CK design theory: An advanced formulation. Research in Engineering Design, 19(4), 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heslin, P. (2009). Better than brainstorming? Potential contextual boundary conditions to brainwriting for idea generation in organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hjorth, D. (2004). Creating space for play/invention – Concepts of space and organizational entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(5), 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hjorth, D. (2005). Organizational entrepreneurship: With De Certeau on creating heterotopias (or spaces for play). Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 386–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo Ludens. A study of the play-element in culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  44. James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Johnstone, K. (1979/2015). IMPRO. Improvisation and the theatre. New York: Routledge/Theatre Arts Books.Google Scholar
  47. Kohn, N., Paulus, P., & Choi, Y. (2011). Building on the ideas of others: An examination of the idea combination process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 554–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Koppett, K. (2001). Training to imagine: Practical, improvisational techniques to inspire creativity, enhance communication and develop leadership. San Francisco: Stylus.Google Scholar
  49. Kurtzberg, T., & Amabile, T. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Litchfield, R., Fan, J., & Brown, V. (2011). Directing idea generation using brainstorming with specific novelty goals. Motivation and Emotion, 35(2), 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Locke, E., & Latham, G. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  52. MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17(7), 484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mainemelis, C., & Ronson, S. (2006). Ideas are born in fields of play: Towards a theory of play and creativity in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 81–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Montuori, A. (2003). The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity: Social science, art and creativity. Human Relations, 56(2), 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moorman, C., & Miner, A. (1998). The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. The Journal of Marketing, 62, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93(1), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nijstad, B., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 186–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nijstad, B., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nisula, A. M., & Kianto, A. (2018). Stimulating organisational creativity with theatrical improvisation. Journal of Business Research, 85, 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nisula, A. M., Kallio, A., Oikarinen, T., & Kianto, A. (2014). Fostering team creativity and innovativeness with playfulness: A multi-case study. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 17(1), 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oikarinen, T., & Kallio, A. (2012). Absorption and creation of new knowledge: A multi-case study of different forms of knowledge impacting on absorptive capacity. Presented at OLKC, Valencia, 25–27 April 2012.Google Scholar
  65. Oldham, G., & Baer, M. (2012). Creativity and the work context. In M. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 387–413). London: Elsevier Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Osborn, A. (1953). Applied imagination. Oxford: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  68. Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups. In Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 110–136). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Paulus, P., & Yang, H. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Phillips, N. (1995). Telling organizational tales: On the role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations. Organization Studies, 16(4), 625–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Roos, J., & Roos, M. (2006). Play is the key. In J. Roos (Ed.), Thinking from within. A hands-on strategy practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Runco, M. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In J. Kaufman & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 413–446). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sawyer, R., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sawyer, R., Csikszentmihalyi, M., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Feldman, D., Gardner, H., Sternberg, R., & Nakamura, J. (Series Eds.). (2003). Creativity and development. Counterpoints: Cognition, memo. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Shalley, C. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spolin, V. (1983). Improvisation for the theater: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Unsworth, K. (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wageman, R., Gardner, H., & Mortensen, M. (2012). The changing ecology of teams: New directions for teams research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna-Maija Nisula
    • 1
  • Kirsimarja Blomqvist
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business and ManagementLUT UniversityLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations