Advertisement

Rejecting the French: Classical British Sociology at the London School of Economics

  • Baudry Rocquin
Chapter

Abstract

Apart from the Edinburgh School of Sociology led by Patrick Geddes and Victor Branford, a parallel attempt was conducted at the London School of Economics under Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse to devise a proper, un- (if not anti-) Durkheimian discipline called sociology. This was characterised by an Idealist point of view in which the individual was the centre, society seen as an illusion and morality an inner, natural sense. All this denigrated the Durkheimian contribution and was in competition with France. The school following Hobhouse can be described as ‘Classical British sociology’ and was foundational for the interwar decades although it was R. H. Tawney who remained the most influential figure over the LSE sociology—despite never claiming to do so.

Bibliography

  1. Barker, Ernest. 1931. ‘Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse, 1864–1929’. Proceedings of the British Academy 15: 536–554.Google Scholar
  2. Branford, Victor. 1929. ‘The Sociological Work of Leonard Hobhouse’. The Sociological Review 21 (4): 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bresard, Marcel. 1950. ‘I. Mobilité Sociale et Dimension de La Famille’. Population (French Edition) 5 (3): 533–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brock, Laurence George. 1934. Report of the Departmental Committee on Sterilisation, Cmnd. 4485. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  5. Bulmer, Martin. 1981. ‘Sociology and Political Science at Cambridge in the 1920s: An Opportunity Missed and an Opportunity Taken’. The Cambridge Review 27 (April): 156–159.Google Scholar
  6. Carr-Saunders, Alexander M. 1922. The Population Problem: A Study in Human Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chester, Norman. 1986. Economics, Politics and Social Studies in Oxford, 1900–85. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Church of England, and Archbishops’ Fifth Committee of Inquiry. 1918. Christianity and Industrial Problems: Being the Report of the Archbishops’ Fifth Committee of Inquiry (Part 1). London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.Google Scholar
  9. Collini, Stefan. 1976. ‘Hobhouse, Bosanquet and the State: Philosophical Idealism and Political Argument in England 1880–1918’. Past & Present 72 (1): 86–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1995. LSE: A History of the London School of Economics and Political Science, 1895–1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fincham, Jill. 1975. ‘The Development of Sociology First Degree Courses at English Universities, 1907–1972’. PhD thesis, London City University, London.Google Scholar
  12. Fletcher, Ronald. 1971. The Making of Sociology: A Study of Sociological Theory. 2 vols. London: Joseph.Google Scholar
  13. Ginsberg, Morris. 1922. ‘The Theory of Progress’. Economica 6: 228–237.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1927. ‘The Scope of Sociology’. Economica 20: 135–149.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1929a. ‘Interchange Between Social Classes’. Economica Journal 39: 554–565.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1929b. ‘The Contribution of Professor Hobhouse to Philosophy and Sociology’. Economica 27: 251–266.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1931. ‘The Place of Instinct in Social Theory’. Economica 31: 25–244.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1933. ‘Recent Tendencies in Sociology’. Economica 39: 22–39.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1939. ‘The Concepts of Juridical and Scientific Law’. Politica 15: 1–15.Google Scholar
  20. Girard, Alain. 1951. ‘II. Mobilité Sociale et Dimension de La Famille - Enquête Dans Les Lycées et Les Facultés’. Population (French Edition) 6 (1): 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glass, David V. 1938. ‘Changes in Fertility in England and Wales, 1851 to 1931’. In Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies, edited by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, 161–212. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  22. Glass, David V., and Jerzy Berent. 1954. Social Mobility in Britain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  23. Glass, David V., and J. L. Gray. 1938. ‘Opportunity and the Older Universities: A Study of the Oxford and Cambridge Scholarship System’. In Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies, edited by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, 418–470. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  24. Goldman, Lawrence. 1987. ‘A Peculiarity of the English? The Social Science Association and the Absence of Sociology in Nineteenth-Century Britain’. Past and Present 114: 133–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gray, J. L., and Pearl Moshinsky. 1938. ‘Ability and Opportunity in English Education’. In Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies, edited by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, 334–376. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  26. Green, Thomas Hill. 1882a. ‘I. Can There Be a Natural Science of Man?’ Mind 7 (25): 1–29.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 1882b. ‘II. Can There Be a Natural Science of Man?’ Mind 7 (26): 161–185.Google Scholar
  28. Green, Thomas Hill, and Andrew Cecil Bradley. 1882. ‘III. Can There Be a Natural Science of Man?’ Mind 7 (27): 321–348.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 1906. Prolegomena to Ethics. 5th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press [1884].Google Scholar
  30. Hadow Committee. 1926. The Education of the Adolescent. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  31. Halsey, A. H. 2004. A History of Sociology in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Harper, Ernest Bouldin. 1933. ‘Sociology in England’. Social Forces 11 (3): 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hawthorn, Geoffrey. 1976. Enlightenment and Despair: A History of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hobhouse, Leonard Trelawny. 1893. The Labour Movement. London: T. Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 1911. Liberalism. London: Oxford University Press. https://archive.org/download/liberalism00hobh/liberalism00hobh.pdf.
  36. ———. 1918. The Metaphysical Theory of the State. London: Allen & Unwin; New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 1921. The Rational Good. New York: H. Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 1922. The Elements of Social Justice. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 1924. Social Development: Its Nature and Conditions. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 1951. Morals in Evolution: A Study in Comparative Ethics. London: Chapman & Hall [1906].Google Scholar
  41. Hobhouse, Leonard Trelawny, G. C. Wheeler, and Morris Ginsberg. 1915. The Material Culture and Social Institutions of the Simpler Peoples: An Essay in Correlation. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Hogben, Lancelot Thomas. 1936. Mathematics for the Million. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 1938a. ‘Introduction to Part II’. In Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies, edited by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, 331–333. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  44. ———, ed. 1938b. Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 1938c. ‘Prolegomena to Political Arithmetic’. In Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies, edited by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, 13–46. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 1938d. Science for the Citizen: A Self-Educator Based on the Social Background of Scientific Discovery. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  47. Howarth, T. E. B. 1978. Cambridge Between Two Wars. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  48. Hyndman, H. M. 1883. The Historical Basis of Socialism in England. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.Google Scholar
  49. Labour Party (Great Britain). 1928. Labour and the Nation. London: Labour Party.Google Scholar
  50. Laski, Harold. 1935. ‘Discretionary Power’. Politica 3: 274–286.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 1936. ‘The Judicial Function’. Politica 6: 115–132.Google Scholar
  52. Lord Riddell. 1929. ‘Sterilisation of the Unfit’. Medico-Legal Journal 23: 107–147.Google Scholar
  53. Mannheim, Karl. 1934. ‘German Sociology (1918–1933)’. Politica 1 (1): 12–33.Google Scholar
  54. Marshall, Thomas Humphrey, ed. 1938a. Class Conflict and Social Stratification: Being the Report of a Conference Held Under the Auspices of the Institute of Sociology at King’s College of Household and Social Science, London, from the 24th to the 26th of September 1937. London: Leplay House Press.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 1938b. The Population Problem: The Experts and the Public. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 1963. Sociology at the Crossroads: And Other Essays. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  58. ———. 1964. ‘The Nature of Class Conflict (1938)’. In Class, Citizenship, and Social Development: Essays, 164–173. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 1981. Right to Welfare and Other Essays. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  60. McDougall, William. 1908. An Introduction to Social Psychology. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
  61. ———. 1920. The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology with Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Mess, Henry A. 1937. ‘Modern Alternatives to the Poor Law’. Politica 8: 380–389.Google Scholar
  63. Petty, William. 1690. Political Arithmetick or a Discourse Concerning, the Extent and Value of Lands, People, Buildings: Husbandry, Manufacture, Commerce, Fishery, Artizans, Seamen, Soldiers; Publick Revenues, Interest, Taxes, Superlucration, Registries, Banks Valuation of Men, Increasing of Seamen, of Militia’s, Harbours, Situation, Shipping, Power at Sea, &c. as the Same Relates to Every Country in General, but More Particularly to the Territories of His Majesty of Great Britain, and His Neighbours of Holland, Zealand, and France. London: Printed for Robert Clavel and Hen. Mortlock.Google Scholar
  64. Population Investigation Committee, and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 1948. Maternity in Great Britain: A Survey of Social and Economic Aspects of Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Raison, Timothy, and Paul Barker. 1979. ‘L. T. Hobhouse’. In The Founding Fathers of Social Science: A Series from New Society, 195–203. London: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
  66. Rogoff, Natalie. 1953. ‘Social Stratification in France and in the United States’. American Journal of Sociology 58 (4): 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sankey Commission. 1919. Coal Industry Commission Act 1919, Second Stage. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  68. Sidgwick, Henry. 1880. ‘Mr. Spencer’s Ethical System’. Mind 5 (18): 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Soffer, Reba N. 1982. ‘Why Do Disciplines Fail? The Strange Case of British Sociology’. The English Historical Review 97 (385): 767–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1927. Social Mobility. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  71. Studholme, Maggie. 1997. ‘From Leonard Hobhouse to Tony Blair: A Sociological Connection?’ Sociology 31 (3): 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tawney, Richard Henry. 1912. The Agrarian Problem in the Sixteenth Century. London and New York: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
  73. ———. 1921. The Acquisitive Society. London: Bell.Google Scholar
  74. ———. 1922. Secondary Education for All: A Policy for Labour. Edited for the Education Advisory Committee of the Labour Party. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  75. ———. 1926. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism: A Historical Study. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
  76. ———. 1964. Equality (with a New Introduction by Richard M. Titmuss). London: Unwin Books [1931].Google Scholar
  77. Tawney, Richard Henry, and Socialist League. 1934. The Choice Before the Labour Party. London: The Socialist League.Google Scholar
  78. Webb, Sidney. 1937. ‘A Basis for Political Science?’ Politica 9: 480–494.Google Scholar
  79. ———. 1967. ‘The Basis of Socialism—Historic’. In Fabian Essays in Socialism, edited by G. Bernard Shaw, William Clarke, Graham Wallas, and Sidney Webb, 46–83. Gloucester: P. Smith [1889].Google Scholar
  80. Westermarck, Edward. 1906. The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas. London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  81. ———. 1921. The History of Human Marriage. 5th ed. London: Macmillan [1893].Google Scholar
  82. ———. 1936. ‘Methods in Social Anthropology’. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 66: 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Younghusband, Francis. 1925. ‘The Sense of Society’. The Sociological Review 17 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baudry Rocquin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations