Advertisement

Accepting the French: The Edinburgh School of Sociology

  • Baudry Rocquin
Chapter

Abstract

In the interwar years, a first version of British sociology emerged at Leplay House (later called the Institute of Sociology) around the Geddesian-Branford school of thought. The latter was also called the ‘Regional Survey Movement’ for its focus on geography, mapping and urban planning. This school was seen as an ally by Marcel Mauss, Durkheim’s nephew, of which some unpublished correspondence was found in the archives. It shows the alliance with the British was crucial financially and intellectually for the French. But the so-called ‘amateur’ Institute was eventually sidelined by a succession of dishonest Oxbridge presidents, despite making notable advances in the sociological discipline thanks to the Sociological Review journal.

Bibliography

  1. Barker, Ernest. 1936a. ‘Political Theory and the Social Sciences’. In Papers on the Social Sciences: Their Relations in Theory and in Teaching, edited by The Institute of Sociology, 96–105. London: Leplay House Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1936b. ‘The Social Background of Recent Political Changes’. The Sociological Review 28 (2): 117–133.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1937. ‘Foreword’. In Further Papers on the Social Sciences: Their Relations in Theory and in Teaching, edited by The Institute of Sociology and J. E. Dugdale, 7–21. London: Leplay House Press.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1953. Age and Youth: Memories of Three Universities and Father of the Man. London and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beaver, S. H. 1962. ‘The Le Play Society and Field Work’. Geography 47 (3): 225–240.Google Scholar
  6. Branford, Sybella Gurney, Alexander Farquharson, and Cities Committee. 1924. An Introduction to Regional Surveys, Prepared at the Instance of the Cities Committee, Leplay House. Westminster: Leplay House Press.Google Scholar
  7. Branford, Victor. 1926. ‘A Survey of Recent and Contemporary Sociology’. The Sociological Review 18 (4): 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Branford, Victor, and Patrick Geddes. 1917. The Coming Polity: A Study in Reconstruction. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  9. Branford, Victor V. 1903. ‘On the Origin and Use of the Word “Sociology,” and on the Relation of Sociological to Other Studies and to Practical Problems’. American Journal of Sociology 9 (2): 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bukharin, Nikolaï. 1926. Historical Materialism: A System of Sociology. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Bulmer, Martin. 1985. ‘The Development of Sociology and of Empirical Social Research in Britain’. In Essays on the History of British Sociological Research, edited by Martin Bulmer, 3–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burawoy, Michael. 2005. ‘For Public Sociology (2004 American Sociological Association Presidential Address)’. The British Journal of Sociology 56 (2): 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durkheim, Émile. 1905. ‘On the Relations of Sociology to the Social Sciences and to Philosophy’. The Sociological Papers 1: 197–216.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, Havelock. 1897. Studies in the Psychology of Sex. London: University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, David. 1986. ‘Le Play House and the Regional Survey Movement in British Sociology 1920–1955’. MPhil thesis. Birmingham Polytechnic, Birmingham. http://www.dfte.co.uk/ios/index.htm.
  16. Evans-Prichard, Edward Evan. 1937. ‘Anthropology and the Social Sciences’. In Further Papers on the Social Sciences: Their Relations in Theory and in Teaching, edited by The Institute of Sociology and J. E. Dugdale, 61–74. London: Leplay House Press.Google Scholar
  17. Falk, Werner. 1935. ‘Democracy and Capitalism in Max Weber’s Sociology’. The Sociological Review 27 (4): 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farquharson, Alexander. 1923. ‘The Oxford Conference on the Correlation of the Social Sciences: An Appreciation of the Discussions’. The Sociological Review 15 (1): 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geddes, Patrick. 1915. Cities in Evolution: An Introduction to the Town Planning Movement and to the Study of Civics. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  20. Gooch, George Peabody, and Alexander Farquharson. 1945. The German Mind and Outlook. London: Chapman & Hall Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Halliday, R. J. 1968. ‘The Sociological Movement, the Sociological Society and the Genesis of Academic Sociology in Britain’. The Sociological Review 16: 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halsey, A. H. 2004. A History of Sociology in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hobhouse, L. T. 1921. ‘Democracy and Civilization’. The Sociological Review 13 (3): 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hood, Christopher, Desmond S. King, and Gillian Peele. 2014. Forging a Discipline: A Critical Assessment of Oxford’s Development of the Study of Politics and International Relations in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Howarth, T. E. B. 1978. Cambridge Between Two Wars. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  26. Jenks, Edward. 1935. ‘Property and the Courts of Justice’. The Sociological Review 27 (1): 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Käsler, Dirk. 1991. Sociological Adventures: Earle Edward Eubank’s Visits with European Sociologists. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Le Play, Frédéric. 1855. Les Ouvriers Européens. Paris.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 1982 [1874]. La réforme sociale en France déduite de l’observation comparée des peuples européens. Genève: Slatkine.Google Scholar
  30. Mannheim, Karl. 1934. ‘The Crisis of Culture in the Era of Mass-Democracies and Autarchies’. The Sociological Review 26 (2): 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marett, Robert Ranulph. 1934. ‘Fact and Value in Sociology’. The Sociological Review 26 (2): 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 1941. A Jerseyman at Oxford. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Marett, R. R., and John Ranulph de la Haule Marett. 1932. Jersey: Suggestions towards a Civic and Regional Survey. London: Le Play House.Google Scholar
  34. Marshall, Thomas Humphrey. 1934. ‘Social Class—A Preliminary Analysis’. The Sociological Review 26 (1): 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 1937. ‘Review of the Results of the Conference’. In Further Papers on the Social Sciences: Their Relations in Theory and in Teaching, edited by The Institute of Sociology and J. E. Dugdale, 153–170. London: Leplay House Press.Google Scholar
  36. ———, ed. 1938. Class Conflict and Social Stratification: Being the Report of a Conference Held Under the Auspices of the Institute of Sociology at King’s College of Household and Social Science, London, from the 24th to the 26th of September 1937. London: Leplay House Press.Google Scholar
  37. Meller, Helen E. 1989. Patrick Geddes: Social Evolutionist and City Planner. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mess, Henry A. 1936. ‘On Spirit and Method in Social Service’. The Sociological Review 28: 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mills, Charles Wright. 1970 [1959]. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press and Pelican Books.Google Scholar
  40. Mills, Charles Wright, and H. H. Gerth. 1948. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  41. Myres, John Linton. 1923. ‘104. The Place of Man and His Environment in the Study of the Social Sciences’. Man 23: 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Renwick, Chris. 2012. British Sociology’s Lost Biological Roots: A History of Futures Past. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Schnapper, Dominique. 2005. ‘A View from a French Sociologist’. In British Sociology Seen from Without and Within, edited by A. H. Halsey and W. G. Runciman, 107–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Scott, John, and Ray Bromley. 2014. Envisioning Sociology: Victor Branford, Patrick Geddes, and the Quest for Social Reconstruction. New York: State of New York Press.Google Scholar
  45. Swinny, S. H. 1919. ‘Sociology: Its Successes and Its Failures’. The Sociological Review 11 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tawney, Richard Henry. 1926. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism: A Historical Study. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
  47. The Institute of Sociology. 1936. Papers on the Social Sciences: Their Relations in Theory and in Teaching. London: Leplay House Press.Google Scholar
  48. White, James Martin. 1928. ‘Communications’. The Sociological Review 20 (4): 340–341.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baudry Rocquin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations