Advertisement

Asking Today the Crucial Questions of Tomorrow: Social Robots and the Internet of Toys

  • Jochen PeterEmail author
  • Rinaldo Kühne
  • Alex Barco
  • Chiara de Jong
  • Caroline L. van Straten
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)

Abstract

Social robots and the Internet of Toys represent key technologies in children’s future lives. Based on Winfield (Robotics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012), we conceptualize the relationship between social robots and smart/connected toys with six characteristics: interactivity, energy, sensors, software control, movement and embodiment. These characteristics, in turn, help to classify social robots and smart/connected toys along three dimensions (i.e. horizontal, vertical and spatial integration), which suggests that the difference between social robots and smart/connected is rather subtle. We identify three common theoretical (absence or heterogeneity of theory, lacking developmental perspective, insufficient attention to intercultural differences) and three methodological issues (lack of standardized measures, study design issues, dominance of cross-sectional studies) that research on both social robots and the Internet of Toys needs to address.

Keywords

Child–robot interaction Human–robot interaction Human–machine interaction Artificial intelligence Childhood 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, under grant agreement No. 682733 to the first author.

References

  1. Barnatt, C. (2015). The next big thing: From 3D printing to mining the moon. ExplainingTheFuture.com.
  2. Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Nomura, T. (2007). The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI & Society, 21(1–2), 217–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-006-0052-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter, P., Kennedy, J., Senft, E., Lemaignan, S., & Belpaeme, T. (2016). From characterising three years of HRI to methodology and reporting recommendations. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 391–398). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).  https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451777.
  4. Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., de Greeff, J., Kennedy, J., Read, R., Looije, R., … Zelati, M. C. (2013). Child-robot interaction: Perspectives and challenges. In ICSR 2013 (Volume 8239) (pp. 452–459).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beran, T. N., Ramirez-Serrano, A., Kuzyk, R., Fior, M., & Nugent, S. (2011). Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child-robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(7–8), 539–550.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bethel, C. L., & Murphy, R. R. (2010). Review of human studies methods in HRI and recommendations. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 347–359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0064-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 167–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broadbent, E. (2017). Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 627–652.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabibihan, J.-J., Javed, H., Ang, M., & Aljunied, S. M. (2013). Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(4), 593–618.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0202-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., Gemo, M., Holloway, D., Marsh, J., Mascheroni, G., … Yamada-Rice, D. (2017). Kaleidoscope on the internet of toys: Safety, security, privacy and societal insights (EUR 28397). Ispra: Joint Research Centre. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.2788/05383.
  11. Colangelo, G. (1995). Vertical vs. horizontal integration: Pre-emptive merging. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 43(3), 323–337.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2950583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679–704.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Graaf, M. M. A., Ben Allouch, S., & Klamer, T. (2015). Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Graaf, M. M. A., Ben Allouch, S., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). Why would I use this in my home? A model of domestic social robot acceptance. Human-Computer Interaction, 1–59.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1312406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Jong, C., Peter, J., Kühne, R., & Barco Martelo, A. (2018). Children’s acceptance of social robots: A narrative review of the research 2000–2017. Manuscript submitted for publication. Google Scholar
  17. Dziergwa, M., Kaczmarek, M., Kaczmarek, P., Kędzierski, J., & Wadas-Szydłowska, K. (2018). Long-term cohabitation with a social robot: A case study of the influence of human attachment patterns. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(1), 163–176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0439-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eberl, U. (2016). Smarte Maschinen. Wie künstliche Intelligenz unser Leben verändert [Smart machines. How artificial intelligence changes our lives]. Munich, Germany: Hanser.Google Scholar
  19. Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R., & Westerman, D. (2016). Initial interaction expectations with robots: Testing the human-to-human interaction script. Communication Studies, 67(2), 227–238.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1121899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eyssel, F. (2017). An experimental psychological perspective on social robotics. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 87, 363–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 143–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Future of Privacy Forum, & Family Online Safety Institute. (2016). Kids and the connected home: Privacy in the age of connected dolls, talking dinosaurs, and battling robots. Retrieved from https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Kids-The-Connected-Home-Privacy-in-the-Age-of-Connected-Dolls-Talking-Dinosaurs-and-Battling-Robots.pdf.
  23. Holloway, D., & Green, L. (2016). The internet of toys. Communication Research and Practice, 2(4), 506–519.  https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1266124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahn, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., … Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303–314.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1), 61–84.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kanngiesser, P., Itakura, S., Zhou, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hood, B. (2015). The role of social eye-gaze in children’s and adults’ ownership attributions to robotic agents in three cultures. Interaction Studies, 16(1), 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.1.01kan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krämer, N. C., Eimler, S., von der Pütten, A., & Payr, S. (2011). Theory of companions: What can theoretical models contribute to applications and understanding of human-robot interaction? Applied Artificial Intelligence, 25(6), 474–502.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2011.587153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Jin, S.-A., & Yan, C. (2006). Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 754–772.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00318.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2013). Social robots for long-term interaction: A survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2), 291–308.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, D., Rau, P. L. P., & Li, Y. (2010). A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(2), 175–186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0056-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lightfoot, C., Cole, M., & Cole, S. R. (2013). The development of children (7th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Looije, R., Neerincx, M. A., Peters, J. K., & Henkemans, O. A. B. (2016). Integrating robot support functions into varied activities at returning hospital visits. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(4), 483–497.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0365-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Looije, R., van der Zalm, A., Neerincx, M. A., & Beun, R.-J. (2012). Help, I need some body: The effect of embodiment on playful learning. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 718–724). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343836.
  35. Marsh, J. (2017). The internet of toys: A posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teachers College Record, 119(12), 1–32. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/113557/.
  36. Mascheroni, G., & Holloway, D. (Eds.). (2017). The internet of toys: A report on media and social discourses around young children and IoToys. DigiLitEY.Google Scholar
  37. Ng, I. C. L., & Wakenshaw, S. Y. L. (2017). The internet-of-things: Review and research directions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 3–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJRESMAR.2016.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pellegrini, A. D., Symons, F., & Hoch, J. (2012). Observing children in their natural worlds: A methodological primer (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203101759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peter, J. (2017a). New communication technologies and young people: The case of social robots. In R. Kühne, S. E. Baumgartner, T. Koch, & M. Hofer (Eds.), Youth and media: Current perspectives on media use and effects (pp. 203–217). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.  https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845280455-203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peter, J. (2017b). Social robots and the robotification of childhood. In S. Chaudron, R. Di Gioia, M. Gemo, D. Holloway, J. Marsh, G. Mascheroni, … D. Yamada-Rice (Eds.), Kaleidoscope on the internet of toys: Safety, security, privacy and societal insights (EUR 28397) (pp. 14–16). Ispra: Joint Research Centre. http://doi.org/10.2788/05383.
  41. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2016). Adolescents and pornography: A review of 20 years of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 509–531.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Riek, L. D. (2012). Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: A systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1), 119–136.  https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Riek.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ross, A. (2016). The industries of the future. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  45. Shahid, S., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2014). Child-robot interaction across cultures: How does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend? Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 86–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Social Robot. (n.d.). Retrieved February 12, 2018, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_robot.
  47. Spence, P. R., Westerman, D., Edwards, C., & Edwards, A. (2014). Welcoming our robot overlords: Initial expectations about interaction with a robot. Communication Research Reports, 31(3), 272–280.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.924337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Steinberg, L. (2008). Adolescence (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  49. Thrun, S. (2004). Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1), 9–24.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Valkenburg, P. M., & Taylor Piotrowski, J. (2017). Plugged in: How media attract and affect youth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2017.1341116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Bergen, W. (2016). De robots komen eraan! Feit en fictie over de toekomst van intelligente machines [The robots are coming! Fact and fiction about the future of intelligent machines]. Amsterdam and Antwerp: Business Contact.Google Scholar
  52. Van Oort, F., Burger, M., & Raspe, O. (2010). On the economic foundation of the urban network paradigm: Spatial integration, functional integration and economic complementarities within the Dutch Randstad. Urban Studies, 47(4), 725–748.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009352362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Straten, C. L., Peter, J., & Kühne, R. (2018). Child-robot relationship formation: A narrative review of empirial research. Manuscript submitted for publication. Google Scholar
  54. Wang, W.-N., Kuo, V., King, C.-T., & Chang, C.-P. (2010). Internet of toys: An e-Pet overview and proposed innovative social toy service platform. In 2010 International Computer Symposium (ICS2010) (pp. 264–269). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).  https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSYM.2010.5685507.
  55. Winfield, A. (2012). Robotics: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199695980.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhao, S. (2006). Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication. New Media & Society, 8(3), 401–419.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806061951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jochen Peter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rinaldo Kühne
    • 1
  • Alex Barco
    • 1
  • Chiara de Jong
    • 1
  • Caroline L. van Straten
    • 1
  1. 1.Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR)University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations