Concluding the Internet of Toys
The concluding chapter reviews the key themes as set out in the introduction and in the contributions to this volume. Here, Mascheroni and Holloway revisit the concepts of datafication and surveillance capitalism in order to emphasise critical questions and map out possible trajectories that future research in the field could address and pursue. The discussion of surveillance capitalism emphasises the double positioning of children in the market as both digital consumers and digital labourers. The chapter also makes the argument that the social and political consequences of datafication extend beyond privacy issues to the transformation of the very conditions under which citizenship is enacted.
KeywordsInternet of Toys Surveillance capitalism Datafication Privacy Citizenship
- Andrejevic, M. (2014). Surveillance in the big data era. In Emerging pervasive information and communication technologies (PICT) (pp. 55–69). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Baraniuk, C. (2016, December 6). Call for privacy probes over Cayla doll and i-Que toys. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-38222472.
- Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2014). Big data and due process: Toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review, 55(1), 93–128.Google Scholar
- De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Ellis, L. (2011). Towards a contemporary sociology of children and consumption. Durham: Durham University.Google Scholar
- Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- Grimes, S. M. (2008). Kids’ ad play: Regulating children’s advergames in the converging media context. International Journal of Communication, Law and Policy, 8, 161–369.Google Scholar
- Harris, M. (2017, December 27). 72 M data points collected on children in spite of COPPA. App Developer Magazine. Retrieved from https://appdevelopermagazine.com/5769/2017/12/27/72m-data-points-collected-on-children-in-spite-of-coppa/.
- Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2017). Digital citizenship and surveillance society: Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 2017(11), 731–739.Google Scholar
- Holloway, D. (in press). Surveillance capitalism and children’s data: The Internet of Toys and Things (IoTTs) for children. Media International Australia. Google Scholar
- Isin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2015). Being digital citizens. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Jennings, K. (2014, July 10). How your doctor and insurer will know your secrets—Even if you never tell them. Business Insider Australia. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com.au/hospitals-and-health-insurers-using-data-brokers-2014-7?r=US&IR=T.
- Leach, W. R. (2011). Land of desire: Merchants, power, and the rise of a new American culture. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Leaver, T. (2015). Born digital? Presence, privacy, and intimate surveillance. In J. Hartley & W. Qu (Eds.), Re-orientation: Translingual transcultural transmedia studies in narrative, language, identity, and knowledge (pp. 149–160). Shanghai: Fudan University Press.Google Scholar
- Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Lyon, D. (2017). Digital citizenship and surveillance| surveillance culture: Engagement, exposure, and ethics in digital modernity. International Journal of Communication, 11, 19.Google Scholar
- Madden, M. (2017). Privacy, security, and digital inequality: How technology experiences and resources vary by socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. New York: Data & Society. Retrieved from https://datasociety.net/pubs/prv/DataAndSociety_PrivacySecurityandDigitalInequality.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2018.
- Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2018). Understanding privacy at the margins. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1157–1165.Google Scholar
- Mascheroni, G., & Holloway, D. (in press). The quantified child: Discourses and practices of dataveillance in different life stages. In O. Erstad, R. Flewitt, B. Kümmerling-Meibauer, & I. S. Pires Pereira (Eds.), Routledge handbook of digital literacies in early childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Minion, L. (2018, April 11). Healthcare suffers almost a quarter of data breaches, as reports skyrocket under mandatory notification scheme. Healthcare IT. Retrieved from http://www.healthcareit.com.au/article/healthcare-suffers-almost-quarter-data-breaches-reports-skyrocket-under-mandatory.
- Montgomery, K. (2002). Digital kids: The new on-line children’s consumer culture. In C. Von Feilitzen & U. Carlsson (Eds.), Children, young people and media globalization (pp. 189–208). Göteborg: Nordicom, The UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media.Google Scholar
- Moore, M. (2016). Tech giants and civic power. King’s College London, Centre for the Study of Media, Communication and Power.Google Scholar
- Osborne, C. (2018, May 1). Healthcare was a top target for ransomware families in 2017. ZDNet. Retrieved from https://www.zdnet.com/article/ransomware-operators-select-the-healthcare-industry-as-a-top-target/.
- Rhoen, M. (2016). Beyond consent: Improving data protection through consumer protection law. Internet Policy Review, 5(1). Google Scholar
- Singleton, M. (2017). Germany bans smartwatches for kids and asks parents to destroy them. The Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2017/11/19/16671428/germany-bans-smartwatches-kids-parents-destruction.
- Steeves, V. (2006). It’s not child’s play: The online invasion of children’s privacy. University of Ottawa Law and Technology Journal, 3(1), 169–188.Google Scholar
- Steeves, V. (2012). Hide and seek: Surveillance of young people on the internet. In K. Haggerty & D. Lyon (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 342–360). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Third, A., & Collin, P. (2016). Rethinking (children’s and young people’s) citizenship through dialogues on digital practice. In A. McCosker, S. Vivienne, & A. Johns (Eds.), Negotiating digital citizenship: Control, contest and culture (pp. 41–59). London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Turner, R. (2017, September 12). Owlet Smart Sock prompts warning for parents, fears over babies’ sensitive health data. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-12/owlet-smart-sock-prompts-warning-for-parents-privacy-concerns/8893104.
- Wakefield, J. (2017, November 17). Germany bans children’s smartwatches. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42030109.
- Walker, H. (2017, February 18). Terrified German parents urged to destroy doll ‘that can spy on children’. Daily Express. Retrieved from http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/768924/My-Friend-Cayla-German-parents-childs-doll-destroy-hacking-internet-smart-technology.