Including Children in the Design of the Internet of Toys

  • Dylan Yamada-RiceEmail author
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)


This chapter draws on three research studies that have important findings for the design of connected toys. Combined, the findings show how children’s involvement in the design of digital toys/ play needs to be more highly prioritised in both research and commercial processes. Doing so would help to balance the dominant amount of commercial and academic research that considers children merely as end-users of digital products. The insights shared include highlighting how children have knowledge different to that of adult-makers and designers. Second, that young children have a range of expertise related to their own digital play, as well as skills for critiquing digital play that could be utilised as part of the design process. Finally, the third study shows how including children in the design process might aid their understanding of how such products work and as a result allow them to be critical of the technologies and content they are consuming.


Toy design Virtual reality Internet of things Game design Early childhood 


  1. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruckman, A., & Bandlow, A. (2003). Human-computer interaction for kids. In The human computer interaction handbook. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Carrington, V. (2012). ‘There’s no going back’: Roxie’s IPhone®: An object ethnography. Language and Literacy, 14(2), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corsaro, W. A., & Molinari, L. (2017). Entering and observing in children’s worlds: A reflection on a longitudinal ethnography of early education in Italy (Chapter 1). In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar
  6. Giddings, S., & Kennedy, H. (2008). Little Jesuses and *@#?-off robots: On cybernetics, aesthetics and not being very good at Lego Star Wars. In M. Swalwell & J. Wilson (Eds.), The pleasures of computer gaming: Essays on cultural history, theory and aesthetics (pp. 13–32). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  7. Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, C., McIver, L., Gibson, L., & Gregor, P. (2003). Experiences obtained from designing with children. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on interaction design and children (pp. 69–74). Preston, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B. A., & Macaulay, B. C. (1999). Methods & tools: The activity checklist: A tool for representing the ‘space’ of context. Interactions, 6, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, Y. (2008). Design participation tactics: The challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. Co-design, 4(1), 31–50.Google Scholar
  11. Love, S., Gkatzidou. V., & Conti, A. (2016). Using a rich pictures approach for gathering students’ and teachers’ digital education requirements. In L. Little, D. Fitton, B. Bell, & N. Toth (Eds.), Perspectives on HCI research with teenagers: Human-computer interaction series. Cham: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mazzone, E., Read J. C., & Beale R. (2011). Towards a framework of Co-design sessions with children. In P. Campos, N. Graham, J. Jorge, N. Nunes, P. Palanque, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-computer interaction—INTERACT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 6949). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller, D. (2008). The comfort of things. London, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, D. (2009). Stuff. London, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nesset, V., & Large, A. (2004). Children in the information technology design process: A review of theories and their applications. Library & Information Science Research, 26, 140–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised and Expanded Edition). Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  17. Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2010). Artifactual literacies: Every object tells a story. New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pérez Ferrer, B., Colton, S., Powley, E., Krzywinska, T., Ceelhoed, E., & Cook, M. (2016). Gamika: Art-based game design. The MetaMakers Institute, Falmouth University, UK. Available online at Accessed 1 May 2018.
  19. Roberts, H. (2017). Listening to children: And hearing them (Chapter 8). In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar
  20. Shove, E., Watson, M., Hand, M., & Ingram, J. (2007). The design of everyday life. Oxford and New York: Berg. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Mechelen, M. (2016). Designing technologies for and with children, a tool kit to prepare and conduct codesign activities and analyse the outcome. Mint Lab. Available online at Accessed 1 May 2018.
  22. Williamson, B. (2003). The participation of children in the design of new technology. Paper, Nesta Futurelab, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Yamada-Rice, D. (2014). The semiotic landscape and three-year-olds’ emerging understanding of multimodal communication practices. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 12(2), 154–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yamada-Rice, D. (2018). Designing play: Young children’s play and communication practices in relation to designers’ intentions for their toy. Global Studies of Childhood, 8(1), 5–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yamada-Rice, D., Mushtaq, F., Woodgate, A., Bosmans, D., Douthwaite, A., Douthwaite, I., … Whitley, S. (2017). Children and virtual reality: Emerging possibilities and challenges. Available online at Accessed 1 May 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal College of ArtLondonUK

Personalised recommendations