Advertisement

Assessment and English Language Learners in Special Education

  • Edgar M. Torres Ovando
  • Danika L. S. Maddocks
  • Angela Valenzuela
Chapter
Part of the Language Policy book series (LAPO, volume 18)

Abstract

Since the implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, statewide accountability measures have drastically changed the way schools address achievement gaps among various student populations. One of the negative consequences of this legislation includes the overreliance on standardized assessment programs across all states. However, one of the populations most impacted are students who are classified as English learners and receive special education services. The following chapter highlights some of the issues English learners in special education programs have faced in Texas. This chapter also makes recommendations for appropriately assessing this student population to truly measure their academic achievement.

Keywords

English language learners High-stakes accountability Special education Sandardized testing Education policy Academic achievement 

References

  1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  2. Aron, L., & Loprest, P. (2012). Disability and the education system. The Future of Children, 22(1), 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blazer, B. (1999). Developing 504 classroom accommodation plans: A collaborative, systematic parent-student-teacher approach. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(2), 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook, B., Gerber, M., & Semmel, M. (1997). Are effective schools reforms effective for all students? The implications of joint outcome production for school reform. Exceptionality, 7(2), 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hagopian, J. (Ed.). (2014). More than a score: The new uprising against high-stakes testing. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  7. Harr-Robins, J., Song, M., Hurlburt, S., Pruce, C., Danielson, L., Garet, M., & Taylor, J. (2012). The inclusion of students with disabilities in school accountability systems (Interim report. NCEE 2012-4056). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.Google Scholar
  8. Hehir, T., & Associates. (n.d.) Review of special education in the Houston Independent School District [DM3].Google Scholar
  9. Madaus, J. W., & Shaw, S. F. (2008). The role of school professionals in implementing Section 504 for students with disabilities. Educational Policy, 22(3), 363–378.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807307069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McLaughlin, M. J., & Thurlow, M. L. (2007). Profiles of reform: Four states’ journeys to implement standards-based reform with students with disabilities (pp. 1–49). College Park, MD: Educational Policy Reform Research Institute.Google Scholar
  11. McNeil, L., & Valenzuela, A. (2001). The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. In M. Kornhaber & G. Orfield (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high stakes testing in public education (pp. 127–150). New York, NY: Century Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Ovando, C. J., Combs, M. C., & Collier, V. P. (2006). Bilingual and ESL classrooms: Teaching in multicultural contexts (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Scull, J., & Winkler, A. M. (2011). Shifting trends in special education. Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Swaby, A. (2016, November 2). TEA denies allegations of cap on special education, Texas Tribune. Retrieved December 1, 2016, from https://www.texastribune.org/2016/11/02/tea-denies-allegations-cap-special-education/
  16. Texas Education Agency. (2005). Enrollment in Texas public schools, 2003–04. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/acctres/Enroll_2003-04.pdf
  17. Texas Education Agency. (2009). Enrollment in Texas public schools, 2008–09. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/acctres/Enroll_2008-09.pdf
  18. Texas Education Agency. (2014a). Enrollment in Texas public schools, 2013–14. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/acctres/Enroll_2013-14.pdf
  19. Texas Education Agency. (2014b). Enrollment for special populations classified as LEP by race/ethnicity. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  20. Texas Education Agency. (2016a). PBMAS state reports. Retrieved February 27, 2017, from http://tea.texas.gov/pbm/stateReports.aspx
  21. Texas Education Agency. (2016b). Texas academic performance report: 2015–16 state performance. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/tapr/2016/state.pdf
  22. Texas Education Agency. (2016c). Texas English language proficiency assessment system: Reading test administrator manual. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=25769824783&libID=25769824880
  23. Texas Education Agency. (2017a). STAAR statewide summary data: Reading and EOC English. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  24. Texas Education Agency. (2017b). STAAR statewide summary data: Math and EOC Algebra I. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  25. Texas Education Agency. (n.d.). STAAR – TAKS equivalent information (bridge study) Tables 2012. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://tea.texas.gov/Student_Testing_and_Accountability/Testing/State_of_Texas_Assessments_of_Academic_Readiness_(STAAR)/STAAR_-_TAKS_Equivalent_Information_(Bridge_Study)_Tables_2012/
  26. Texas Education Agency & Pearson. (2010). Texas assessment of knowledge and skills (TAKS), TAKS (accommodated), and linguistically accommodated testing (LAT). Technical digest 2008–2009. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/student.assessment/techdigest/yr0809/
  27. Texas Education Agency & Pearson. (2011). Historical overview of assessment in Texas. Technical digest 2010–2011. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/Student_Testing_and_Accountability/Testing/Student_Assessment_Overview/Technical_Digest_2010-2011/
  28. Texas Education Agency & Pearson. (2015). Historical overview of assessment in Texas. Technical digest 2013–2014. Retrieved from http://tea.texas.gov/Student_Testing_and_Accountability/Testing/Student_Assessment_Overview/Technical_Digest_2013-2014/
  29. Thurlow, M. L. (1994). National and state perspectives on performance assessment and students with disabilities. Performance assessment: CEC mini-library. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
  30. Valenzuela, A. (2005). Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  31. Viadero, D. (2004). Disparately disabled. Education Week, 17(22), 25–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edgar M. Torres Ovando
    • 1
  • Danika L. S. Maddocks
    • 2
  • Angela Valenzuela
    • 1
  1. 1.Education Leadership and PolicyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Educational PsychologyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations