Converged Approach in Regulation for Socializing Transnational Corporations

  • Mia Mahmudur RahimEmail author
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)


The prolonged attempt to create a global code for TNCs was ultimately unsuccessful, yet the simultaneous rise of global frameworks and guidelines by various private bodies highlight the need for monitoring of the performance of TNCs in addition to evaluation of their accountability practice. But none of the current frameworks and guidelines has been successful in laying down a clear way forward for the creation of an accepted global code of conduct for TNCs. The corporate social responsibility movement is a reaction to this need; it assists the shift of the market centred focus of global regulatory framework initiatives to ‘people centred’ (as opposed to country-centred) concerns. Accordingly, the core CSR principles urge that TNCs must not only be compliant but also responsible to their wider stakeholders and the environment. This chapter presents how the implementation of CSR principles in corporations can be an alternative to a global code of conduct for socialising TNCs.


  1. Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2001). Economics of the ‘Third Way’: Introduction. Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arora, S., & Cason, T. N. (1995). An experiment in voluntary environmental regulation: Participation in EPA’s 33/50 Program. Journal of Economics and Management, 28, 271–286.Google Scholar
  3. Bagi, A., Krabalo, M., & Narani, L. (2004). An overview of corporate social responsibility in Croatia. Zagreb: AED.Google Scholar
  4. Bakan, J. (2012). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. Hachette UK.Google Scholar
  5. Ballebye, M. (2008). CSR as a tool to reduce CO2- Is intervention necessary? (Masters), Aalborg University.Google Scholar
  6. Bank, T. W. (1997). World development report 1997—The state in a changing world. Retrieved from
  7. Baxter, H. (1996). Bringing Foucault into law and law into Foucault. Stanford Law Review, 449–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhagwati, J. (2007). In defense of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Bianchi, R., & Noci, G. (1998). Greening’ SMEs’ competitiveness. Small Business Economics, 11, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bizer, K., & Julich, R. (1999). Voluntary agreements-trick or treat? European Environment, 9(2), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blair, T., & Schroder, G. (1999). Europe: The third way/Die Neue Mitte.Google Scholar
  12. Bradgon, J. H., & Marlin, J. (1972). Is pollution profitable? Risk Management, 19(4), 9–18.Google Scholar
  13. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Brau, R., & Carraro, C. (1999). Voluntary approaches, market structure and competition. Retrieved from
  15. Buhmann, K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: What role for law? Some aspects of law and CSR. Corporate Governance, 6(2), 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burchill, S. (2001). Realism and neo-realism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  17. Carraro, C., & Siniscalco, D. (1996). Voluntary agreements in environmental policy: A theoretical appraisal. In A. Xepapadeas (Ed.), Economic policy for the environment and natural resources. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 38(3), 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carty, A., & Mair, J. (1990). Some post-modern perspectives on law and society. Journal of Law and Society, 17(4), 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cavaliere, A. (1998). Voluntary agreements, over-compliance and environmental reputation. Milan: FEEM Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.Google Scholar
  23. Cavaliere, A. (2000). Over-compliance and voluntary agreements: A note about environmental reputation. Environmental & Resource Economics, 17(2), 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chang, H.-J. (2003). Globalisation, economic development, and the role of the state. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  25. Charnovitz, S. (1996). Two centuries of participation: NGOs and international governance. Michigan Journal of International Law, 18(1).Google Scholar
  26. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 863–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3(October), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Conley, J. M., & Williams, C. A. (2005). Engage, embed, and embellish: Theory versus practice in the corporate social responsibility movement. Journal of Corporation Law, 31, 1.Google Scholar
  29. Conzelmann, T. (2008). A new public-private divide? Co-and self-regulation in the EU. In F. Larat (Ed.), Efficient and democratic governance in the european union. Connex: European Union.Google Scholar
  30. Croucher, S. L. (2004). Globalization and belonging: The politics of identity in a changing world. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Dahlsrud, A. (2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. De Bakker, F. G., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & society, 44(3), 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Colombia Law Review, 98(2), 267–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Driver, S., & Martell, L. (2000). Left, right and the third way. Policy & Politics, 28(2), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Elkington, J. (2001). The triple bottom line for 21 st-century business. London: Sterling.Google Scholar
  38. Esty, D. C., & Winston, A. S. (2009). Green-to-gold-plays. Retrieved from–Plays/47943.
  39. European Commission. (2001). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility: Green paper. Retrieved from
  40. Foucault, M. (1998). The will to knowledge. Penguin Books: London.Google Scholar
  41. Forum, W. E. (2002). Global corporate citizen: The leadership challenge for CEOs and boards. Retrieved from
  42. Fox, T. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and development. Quest of an Agenda. Development, 47(3), 29–36.Google Scholar
  43. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (Vol. 1). Pitman.Google Scholar
  44. Freeman, J. (1997). Collaborative governance in the administrative state. UCLA Law. Review, 45.Google Scholar
  45. Freeman, E. R., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. The Blackwell handbook of strategic management, pp. 189–207.Google Scholar
  46. Freeman, R. E., Velamuri, S. R., & Moriarty, B. (2006). Company stakeholder responsibility: A new approach to CSR. Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics, 19.Google Scholar
  47. Friedman, M. (1970). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13, 33.Google Scholar
  48. Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, 173–178.Google Scholar
  49. Garth, B., & Sterling, J. (1998). From legal realism to law and society: reshaping law for the last stages of the social activist state. Law and Society Review, 409–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Giddens, A. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  52. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  53. Giddens, A. (1996). Beyond the left and right. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  54. Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  55. Giddens, A. (2000). The third way and its critics. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  56. Gilad, S. (2010). It runs in the family: Meta regulation and its siblings. Regulation & Governance, 4(4), 485–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gill, A. (2008). Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research Agenda. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26, 452–462.Google Scholar
  58. Gilpin, R. (2018). The challenge of global capitalism: The world economy in the 21st century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. González, M. d. l., & Martinez, C. V. (2004). Fostering corporate social responsibility through public initiative: From the EU to the Spanish Case. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 277.Google Scholar
  60. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Carol, A. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  61. Greenfield, K. (2000). Corporate social responsibility: There’s a forest in those trees: Teaching about corporate social responsibility. Georgia Law Review, 34, 1011.Google Scholar
  62. Hanrahan, P., Ramsay, I., & Stapledon, G. (2002). Commercial applications of company law. Melbourne: CCH Australia.Google Scholar
  63. Harlow, C. (2016). Law and public administration: Convergence and symbiosis. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71 (2), 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hobson, J. M. (2000). The state and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hombach, B. (2000). The politics of the new centre. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  66. Hopkins, M. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: An issue paper. Working Paper No. 27, Policy Integration Department, World Commission on Social Dimension of Globalisation.Google Scholar
  67. Hunt, A. (1992). Foucault’s expulsion of law: Toward a retrieval. Law & Social Inquiry, 17(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hunt, A., & Wickham, G. (1994). Foucault and law: Towards a sociology of law as governance. Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  69. Hutter, B. M. (2006). The role of non-state actors in regulation. Retrieved from
  70. Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Jamali, D., Mezher, T., & Bitar, H. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and the challenge of triple bottom line integration: Insights from the Lebanese context. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 5(4), 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. James, N. (2008). Distracting the message: Corporate convictions and the legitimation of neo-liberalism. Macquarie Law Journal, 8, 179.Google Scholar
  73. Jänicke, M., & Weidner, H. (1997). Summary: Global environmental policy learning. National environmental policies: A comparative study of capacity-building. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Juholin, E. (2004). For business or the good of all? A Finnish approach to corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance, 4(3), 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kakabadse, N. K., Rozuel, C., & Lee-Davies, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: A conceptual review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Karkkainen, B. C. (2003). Adaptive ecosystem management and regulatory penalty defaults: Toward a bounded pragmatism. Minosota Law Review, 87.Google Scholar
  77. Kolk, A., Van Tulder, R., & Welters, C. (1999). International codes of conduct and corporate social responsibility: Can transnational corporations regulate themselves? Avril, 8, 143–180.Google Scholar
  78. Konrad, A., Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., & Martinuzzi, A. (2006). Empirical findings on business–society relations in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(1), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Levi-Faur, D. (2006). Regulatory capitalism: The dynamics of change beyond telecoms and electricity. Governance, 19(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Litowitz, D. (1995). Foucault on law: Modernity as negative Utopia. Queen’s Law Journal, 21, 1.Google Scholar
  81. Lobel, O. (2004). The renew deal: The fall of regulation and the rise of governance in contemporary legal thought. Minnesota Law Review, 89.Google Scholar
  82. Lobel, O. (2005). Interlocking regulatory and industrial relations: The governance of workplace safety. Administrative Law Review, 57, 1071.Google Scholar
  83. Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, alliance and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mankiw, N. G. (2004). Principles of economics. Thomson.Google Scholar
  85. Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Marrewijk, M. V. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Marsden C. (2001). The role of public authorities in corporate social responsibility. [23 June 2003].
  89. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2007). Pan-European approach. A conceptual framework for understanding CSR. Corporate ethics and corporate governance, pp. 179–199.Google Scholar
  90. Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2004). Behind the mask: The real face of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1), 109–120.Google Scholar
  91. McAdam, R., & Leonard, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in a total quality management context: Opportunities for sustainable growth. Corporate Governance, 3(4), 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Midttun, A. (2008). Partnered governance: Aligning corporate responsibility and public policy in the global economy. Corporate Governance, 8(4), 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mitchell, L. E. (2001). Corporate irresponsibility: America’s newest export. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Monbiot, G. (2013). Captive state: The corporate takeover of Britain. Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar
  95. OECD. (1997). Reforming environmental regulation in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  96. OECD. (2003). Voluntary approaches for environmental policy: Effectiveness, efficiency and usage in policy mixes. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. O’Rourke, D. (2003) Outsourcing regulation: Analyzing nongovernmental systems of labor standards and monitoring. Policy Studies Journal 31(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Parker, C. (2006). The” compliance” trap: The moral message in responsive regulatory enforcement. Law & Society Review, 40(3), 591–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Peattie, K. J., Solomon, J., Hunt, J., & Solomon, A. (2002). Research insights into corporate social responsibility. New Academy Review, 1(3), 39–54.Google Scholar
  100. Peters, M., & Turner, R. K. (2004). SME environmental attitudes and participation in local-scale voluntary initiatives: Some practical applications. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(3), 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pflum, M. (2007). Wal-Mart commits to going green. ABC News. Retrieved from
  102. Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rahim, M. M. (2011). Meta-regulation approach of law: A potential legal strategy to develop socially responsible business selfregulation in least developed common law countries. Common Law World Review, 42(2), 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rasche, A., Waddock, S., & McIntosh, M. (2013) The united nations global compact: Retrospect and prospect. Business & Society, 52(1), 6–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rowe, J. K. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as business strategy. In: Globalization, governmentality and global politics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  106. Runhaar, H., & Lafferty, H. (2009). Governing corporate social responsibility: An assessment of the contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR strategies in the telecommunications industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Russell, C. S., & Powell, P. T. (1999). Practical considerations and comparison of instruments of environmental policy. In J. v. d. Bergh (Ed.), Handbook of environmental and resource economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  108. Sairinen, R., & Teittinen, O. (1999). Voluntary agreements as an environmental policy instrument in Finland. European Environment, March-April, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Sayer, A. R. (2000). Realism and social science. London: Sage Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schembera, S. (2018). Implementing corporate social responsibility: Empirical insights on the impact of the UN Global Compact on its business participants. Business and Society, 57(5), 783–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Schmit, J. (2010). Going greener: Wal-Mart plans new solar power initiative. USA Today.Google Scholar
  112. Schrage, E. (2004). Promoting international worker rights through private voluntary initiatives: Public relations or public policy. Report presented to the US Department of State by the University of Iowa Centre for Human Rights.Google Scholar
  113. Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Shearing, C., & Wood, J. (2003). Nodal governance, democracy, and the new ‘Denizens’. Journal of Law and Society, 30(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Slote, M. (1997). From morality to virtue. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Sternberg, E. (1997). Stakeholder theory: The defective state it’s in. London: IEA.Google Scholar
  117. Stewart, R. B. (1986). Reconstitutive law. Maryland Law Review, 46.Google Scholar
  118. Stiglitz, J. (1991). The economic role of the state: Efficiency and effectiveness in the public domain. In T. P. Hardiman & M. Mulreany (Eds.), Efficiency and effectiveness in the public domain. Dublin: IPA.Google Scholar
  119. Stiglitz, J. (1996). Some lessons from the East Asian miracle (Vol. 11). Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  120. Stiglitz, J. (2001). An agenda for development for the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  121. Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization and the economic role of the state in the new millennium. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sturm, S. (2001). Second generation employment discrimination: A structural approach. Columbia Law Review, 101.Google Scholar
  123. Sturm, S. (2006). The architecture of inclusion: Advancing workplace equity in higher education. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 29.Google Scholar
  124. Testy, Y. K. (2004). Capitalism and freedom: For whom? Feminist legal theory and progressive corporate law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 67(4), 87–108.Google Scholar
  125. Teubner, G. (1986). After legal instrumentalism? Strategic models of post-regulatory law. Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, 299.Google Scholar
  126. Teubner, G. (1988). Introduction to autopoietic law. Autopoietic law: A new approach to law and society, 1(3).Google Scholar
  127. Thompson, G. (2005). Global corporate citizenship: What does it mean? Competition and Change, 9(2), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. UNEP. (1998). Voluntary initiatives, Industry and Environment, 21(1–2): UNEP.Google Scholar
  129. Vance, S. (1975). Are socially responsible firms good investment risk? Management Review, 64, 18–24.Google Scholar
  130. Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (1999). International relations theory: Realism, pluralism globalism and beyond. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  131. Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Watts, P., & Holme, R. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  133. Wheeler, S. (2002). Corporations and the third way. Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  134. White, A. (2005). Fade, integrate or transform? The future of CSR. Business for social responsibility, issue paper, www. bsr. org.Google Scholar
  135. White, A. L. (2006). Business brief: Intangibles and CSR. Business for social responsibility6.Google Scholar
  136. Wickham, G., & Pavlich, G. (2001). Rethinking law, society and governance: Foucault’s bequest. Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  137. Williamson, O. E. (1996). Revisiting legal realism: The law, economics, and organization perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 383–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Windsor, D. (2001). The future of corporate social responsibility. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(3), 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Zarsky, L. (2002). Beyond good deeds: For multinational corporations to adopt socially responsible practices, voluntary measures are not enough.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations