Meca-Medina & Majcen: A New Way Forward

  • Jan ExnerEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Law book series (BRIEFSLAW)


Before analysing the rules governing sporting nationality in the context of EU law, I devote a special chapter to the ECJ’s judgment in Meca-Medina & Majcen, which is significant from several perspectives. First, it definitely brought sporting rules into the scope of EU law while demising the purely sporting rules exception (4.1). Second, the ECJ summarised and clarified the up to date case law regarding the assessment of the compatibility of sporting rules with EU law.



  1. Case C-13/76, Dona v. Mantero, [1976] EU:C:1976:115Google Scholar
  2. Case T-93/18, International Skating Union v. CommissionGoogle Scholar
  3. Case C-519/04 P, Meca-Medina and Majcen v. Commission, [2006] EU:C:2006:492Google Scholar
  4. Case C-519/04 P, Meca-Medina and Majcen v. Commission, [2006] EU:C:2006:492, opinion of the Advocate General Philippe LégerGoogle Scholar
  5. Case C-325/08, Olympique Lyonnais, [2010] EU:C:2010:143Google Scholar
  6. Case C-415/93, Union royale belge des sociétés de football association and Others v. Bosman and Others, [1995] EU:C:1995:463Google Scholar
  7. Case C-309/99, Wouters and Others, [2002] EU:C:2002:98Google Scholar
  8. Case COMP/39471, Certain joueur de tennis professionnel/Agence mondiale antidopage, ATP Tour Inc. et Fondation Conseil international de l’arbitrage en matière de sport [12 October 2009]Google Scholar
  9. Case COMP/40208, International Skating Union’s Eligibility Rules [8 December 2017]Google Scholar
  10. Case COMP/38158, Meca-Medina and Majcen v. International Olympic Committee [1 August 2002]Google Scholar
  11. Joined cases C-51/96 and C-191/97, Deliège, [2000] EU:C:2000:199Google Scholar


  1. Exner J (2018) ‘Anti-doping and athletes’ rights under EU law: four-year period of ineligibility as disproportionate sanction? Int Sports Law J 17(3–4):128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Infantino (2006) Meca-Medina: a step backwards for the European sports model and the specificity of sport?Google Scholar
  3. Weatherill S (2014) On overlapping legal orders: what is the ‘Purely Sporting’ Rule? In: Weatherill S (Ed) European Sports Law—Collected Papers, 2nd ed., T.M.C. Asser Press, pp 401–424Google Scholar
  4. Meca outsprints Capell for gold, BBC, 23 July 2005, Accessed 31 October 2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations