Advertisement

New Market Creation for Technological Breakthroughs: Commercial Drones and the Disruption of the Emergency Market

  • Federico CarliEmail author
  • Maria Elena Manzotti
  • Hugo Savoini
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 30)

Abstract

The emergency response market is considered as the most far from warfare, in which drones were incepted. The multicase study research focusing on three NGOs operating to save the lives of migrants in distress at sea in the Mediterranean area showed that emergency is indeed a market suitable for disruption. Moreover, being a not for profit field, the disruption by commercial drones follows a different path than other civilian markets. Commercial drones will likely spread among civilian markets and disrupt several of them, including emergency.

Keywords

Drones Emergency Disruption 

References

  1. 1.
    Parihar, P., Bhawsar, P., Hargod, P.: Design & development analysis of quadcopter. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Technol. 5(6), 2128–2133 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farquharson, J.: Britain and the flying bomb: the research programme between the two World Wars. War in History, 133, 363–379 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kindervater, K.H: The emergence of lethal surveillance: watching and killing in the history of drone technology. Secur. Dialogue, 47(3), 223–238 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rao, B., Gopi, A.G., Maione, R.: The societal impact of commercial drones. Technol. Soc. 45, 83–90 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke, R.: Understanding the drone epidemic. Comput. Law and Secur. Rev. 30(3), 230–246 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boucher, P.: Domesticating the drone: management strategies for unmanned aircraft in society. Making Society through Science and Technology, A Matter of Design (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chao, H, Cao, Y., Chen, Y.: Autopilots for small unmanned aerial vehicles: a survey. Int. J. Control, Autom. Syst., 8(1), 36–44 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dosi, G.: Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econ. Lit. 26(3), 1120–1171 (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clarke, R.: What drones inherit from their ancestors. Comput. Law and Secur. Rev. 30(3), 247–262 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boyle, M.J.: The race for drones. Orbis. 59(1), 76–94 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Antebi, L.: Changing trends in unmanned aerial vehicles: new challenges for states, armies and security industries. Mil. Strateg. Aff. 6(2), 21–36 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sandvik, K.B., Lohne, K.: The rise of the humanitarian drone: giving content to an emerging concept. Millennium: J. Int. Stud. 43(1), 145–164 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mosterman, P.J., Sanabria, D.E., Bilgin, E., Zhang, K., Zander, J.: Automating humanitarian missions with a heterogeneous fleet of vehicles. Annu. Rev. Control, 38(2), 259–270 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soesilo, D., Meier, P., Lessard-Fontaine, A., Du Plessis, J., Stuhlberger, C., Fabbroni, V.: Drones in Humanitarian Action. Indipendent report, Swiss Foundation for Mine Action (FSD) (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Migrant Offshore Aid Station, https://www.moas.eu/
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    SOS Méditerranée, sosmediterranee.orgGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federico Carli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Elena Manzotti
    • 2
  • Hugo Savoini
    • 3
  1. 1.Università Telematica Internazionale UNINETTUNORomeItaly
  2. 2.LUISS Guido CarliRomeItaly
  3. 3.Associazione di Cultura Economica e Politica Guido CarliMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations