Advertisement

Supply Chain Resilience: An Optimisation Model to Identify the Relative Importance of SC Disturbances

  • João Pires RibeiroEmail author
  • Ana Barbosa-Póvoa
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 278)

Abstract

Supply Chains (SC) have been facing a vast set of events that can endanger their operations and produce permanent damage, which are unknown until its occurrence. This led to an increased awareness of SC Resilience to deal with such SC uncertainty. This work uses a Mixed Integer Linear Programming model to study the relative importance of the different types of events that threaten SC operations exploring the use of two indicators Expected NPV (ENPV) and Expected Service Level (ECSL). From this work, it can be said that upstream disturbances are of greater importance and because of that should be more efficiently managed, generating value and ultimately a competitive advantage to companies that deploy resilience concerns to their operations.

Keywords

Supply chain Resilience Optimisation Disturbances 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the project DPI2015-67740-P (MINECO/FEDER).

References

  1. 1.
    Adenso-Diaz, B., Mena, C., García-Carbajal, S., Liechty, M.: The impact of supply network characteristics on reliability. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 17(3), 263–276 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cardoso, S.R., Barbosa-Póvoa, A.P., Relvas, S., Novais, A.Q.: Resilience metrics in the assessment of complex supply-chains performance operating under demand uncertainty. Omega 56, 53–73 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hohenstein, N.O., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., Giunipero, L.: Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: a systematic review and paths for further investigation. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 45(1/2), 90–117 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kamalahmadi, M., Parast, M.M.: A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: major findings and directions for future research. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 171, 116–133 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ponomarov, S.: Antecedents and consequences of supply chain resilience: a dynamic capabilities perspective (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ponomarov, S.Y., Holcomb, M.C.: Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 20(1), 124–143 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ribeiro, J.P., Barbosa-Povoa, A.: Supply chain resilience: definitions and quantitative modelling approaches-A literature review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 115, 109–122 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rice, J.B., Caniato, F.: Building a secure and resilient supply network. Supply Chain Management Review 7(5), 22–30 (2003) (Ill)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang, C.S.: Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 9(1), 33–45 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, J., Muddada, R.R., Wang, H., Ding, J., Lin, Y., Liu, C., Zhang, W.: Toward a resilient holistic supply chain network system: concept, review and future direction. IEEE Syst. J. 10(2), 410–421 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEG-IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations