Advertisement

Normal Topography

  • Melanie Corbett
  • Nicholas Maycock
  • Emanuel Rosen
  • David O’Brart
Chapter

Abstract

The cornea is aspheric and normally prolate: the central cornea is approximately spherical in front of the pupil and then flattens peripherally through the paracentral and peripheral zones towards the limbal zone, but asymmetrically in different meridia. The centre of the cornea can be defined geometrically (intersection of horizontal and vertical meridia), at the apex, aligned with the pupil centre, or on the visual axis.

Patients with spherical refractions tend to have round or oval patterns. Corneas with regular astigmatism have symmetric or asymmetric bowtie patterns, where as those with irregular astigmatism tend to have an irregular pattern. The right and left eyes of an individual demonstrate enantiomorphism, with mirror image symmetry.

Astigmatism tends to be minimal at birth and then develops “with the rule” (steep in the vertical meridian) during adolescence, possibly due to pressure from the lids. This tends to reduce during middle life and may even reverse to be “against the rule” (steep in the horizontal meridian) later in life.

Contact lens-induced corneal warpage is more common with rigid lenses than soft and is likely to be due to sustained pressure from the lens. Artefacts of corneal shape may arise from errors of alignment and focusing and from tear film drying which manifests as small areas of focal flattening or irregularity.

Keywords

Corneal topography Corneal shape Normal cornea Aspheric Prolate Oblate Corneal centre Central zone Mid-peripheral zone Limbal zone Corneal meridia Corneal patterns Spherical refraction Meridian Astigmatism Bow tie Enantiomorphism With-the-rule Against-the-rule Contact lens Corneal warpage Artefact Alignment errors Corneal drying 

References

*References Particularly Worth Reading

  1. 1.
    *Dingeldein SA, Klyce SD. The topography of normal corneas. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 512–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fleming JF. Should refractive surgeons worry about corneal asphericity? Refract Corneal Surg. 1990;6:455–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carney LG, Mainstone JC, Henderson BA. Corneal topography and myopia: a cross-sectional study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:311–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    *Waring GO. Making sense of keratospeak II: proposed conventional terminology for corneal topography. Refract Corneal Surg 1989; 5: 362–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eghbali F, Yeung KK, Maloney RK. Topographic determination of corneal asphericity and its lack of effect on the outcome of radial keratotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;119:275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edmund C, Sjontoft E. The central-peripheral radius of the normal corneal curvature: a photokeratoscopic study. Acta Ophthalmol. 1985;63:670–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang J, Rice DA, Klyce SD. A new reconstruction algorithm for improvement of corneal topographical analysis. Refract Corneal Surg. 1989;5:379–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holladay JT. Corneal topography using the Holladay diagnostic summary. J Cat Refract Surg. 1997;23:209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duke-Elder S. System of ophthalmology. Vol V: ophthalmic optics and refraction. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1970. p. 274–95.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Young T. The mechanisms of the eye. Philos Trans. 1801;91:23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donders F. On the anomalies of refraction and accommodation of the eye. London: The New Sydenham Society; 1864.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fredrick S, Wilson G. The relation between eyelid tension, corneal toricity, and age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24:1367–73.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mandell RB, St Helen R. Stability of the corneal contour. Am J Optom. 1968;45:797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clark BA. Mean topography of normal corneas. Aust J Optom. 1974;57:107–14.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clark BA. Topography of some individual corneas. Aust J Optom. 1974;57:65–9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mandell RB, St Helen R. Position and curvature of the corneal apex. Am J Optom. 1969;46:25–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    *Uozato H, Guyton DL. Centring corneal surgical procedures. Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 103: 264–275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fay AM, Trokel SL, Myers JA. Pupil diameter and the principal ray. J Cat Refract Surg. 1992;18:348–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    *Pande M, Hillman JS. Optical zone centration in keratorefractive surgery. Ophthalmology 1993; 100: 1230–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Doane JF, Cavanaugh TB. Optical zone centration for keratorefractive surgery [letter]. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:215–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pande M. Optical zone centration for keratorefractive surgery [reply]. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mandell RB. Optical zone centration for keratorefractive surgery [letter]. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:216–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pande M. Optical zone centration for keratorefractive surgery [reply]. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:217–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guyton DL. More on optical zone centration [letter]. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pande M, Hillman JS. More on optical zone centration [reply]. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:793–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tomlinson A, Schwartz C. The position of the corneal apex in the normal eye. Am J Optom Phys Optics. 1979;56:236–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McAlinden C. Corneal refractive surgery: past to present. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95(4):386–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mosquera SA, Verma S, McAlinden C. Centration axis in refractive surgery. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015;2:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Knoll HA. Corneal contours in the general population as revealed by the photokeratoscope. Am J Optom. 1961;38:389–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    *Bogan SJ, Waring GO, Ibrahim O, Drews C, Curtis L. Classification of normal corneal topography based on computer-assisted videokeratography. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108: 945–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rabinowitz YS, Yang H, Brickman Y, Akkina J, Riley C, Rotter JI, Elashoff J. Videokeratography database of normal human corneas. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:610–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alvi NP, McMahon TT, Devulappally J, Chen TC, Vianna MAG. Characteristics of normal corneal topography using the EyeSys corneal analysis system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:849–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    *Naufal SC, Hess JS, Friedlander MH, Granet NS. Rasterstereography-based classification of normal corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 222–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Marin-Amat M. The physiological variations of the corneal curvature during life, their significance in ocular refraction. Bull Soc Belg Ophthalmol. 1957;136:263.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sawada A. Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(2):363–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kiely PM, Carney LG, Smith G. Diurnal variations of corneal topography and thickness. Am J Optom Physiol Optic. 1982;59:976–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG. The diurnal variation of corneal topography and aberrations. Cornea. 2005;24(6):678–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Clark BAJ. Variations in corneal topography. Aust J Optom. 1973;56:399–413.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    El Hage SD, Beaulne C. Changes in central and peripheral corneal thickness with menstrual cycle. Am J Optom Physiol Optic. 1973;50:863–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kiely PM, Carney LG, Smith G. Menstrual cycle variations of corneal topography and thickness. Am J Optom Physiol Optic. 1983;60:822–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Giuffrè G, Di Rosa L, Fiorino F, Bubella DM, Lodato G. Variations in central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle in women. Cornea. 2007;26(2):144–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ghahfarokhi NA, Vaseghi A, Ghoreishi M, et al. Evaluation of corneal thickness alterations during menstrual cycle in productive age women. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63(1):30–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schornack M. Hydrogel contact lens-induced corneal warpage. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2003;26(3):153–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ruiz-Montenegro J, Mafra CH, Wilson SE, Jumper JM, Klyce SD, Mendelson EN. Corneal topographic alterations in normal contact lens wearers. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:128–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wilson SE, Lin DTC, Klyce SD, Reidy JJ, Insler MS. Topographic changes in contact lens-induced warpage. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:734–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang J, Rice DA, Klyce SD. Analysis of the effects of astigmatism and misalignment on corneal surface reconstruction from photokeratoscopic data. Refract Corneal Surg. 1991;7:129–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    *Hubbe RE, Foulks GN. The effect of poor fixation on computer-assisted topographic corneal analysis. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1745–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Singh D. Effect of cataract on corneal topography results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:1506–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Karabatsas CH, Hoh HB. Is it cataract or misalignment that affects corneal topography measurements? [letter]. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:694–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mishima S. Some physiological aspects of the precorneal tearfilm. Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;73:233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    *Pavlopoulos GP, Horn J, Feldman ST. The effect of artificial tears on computer-assisted corneal topography in normal eyes and after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1995; 119: 712–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Novak KD, Kohnen T, Chang-Godinich A, Soper BA, Kennedy P, Wang Q, Padrick T, Koch DD. Changes in computerised videokeratography induced by artificial tears. J Cat Refract Surg. 1997;23:1023–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie Corbett
    • 1
  • Nicholas Maycock
    • 2
  • Emanuel Rosen
    • 3
  • David O’Brart
    • 4
  1. 1.Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
  2. 2.University Hospital Coventry and WarwickshireCoventryUK
  3. 3.ManchesterUK
  4. 4.Department of OphthalmologySt. Thomas HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations