Advertisement

Keratoplasty

  • Melanie Corbett
  • Nicholas Maycock
  • Emanuel Rosen
  • David O’Brart
Chapter

Abstract

Transplantation of corneal tissue can have relatively little effect on corneal shape when the layers removed and replaced are thin but can have more profound effects when thicker or even full-thickness.

Corneal steepening can result from tissue compression by tight sutures or tissue contraction as a result of cautery or scarring. Corneal flattening can result from suture loosening or the graft over-riding the host. Irregular astigmatism can result from a combination of focal changes at different sites or a torsional effect from horizontal wound misalignment.

After keratoplasty, topography may be prolate if steep centrally, oblate if flat centrally or mixed. In astigmatism, the ends of the bow ties tend to be flattened due to the graft-host junction and may be of different sizes or at an angle in asymmetric astigmatism. Irregular astigmatism may have a variety of patterns including steep/flat, horseshoe or trefoil.

In all types of anterior segment surgery, incisions have greater effect if they are longer, deeper, more vertical and nearer the centre of the cornea. Wound misalignment, either horizontally or vertically, can cause irregular astigmatism. Sutures should be sufficiently long, deep and perpendicular to the wound (radial in the case of a keratoplasty) to support the tissues in the appropriate shape.

Keywords

Corneal topography Keratoplasty Corneal graft Corneal transplant Corneal sutures Tight sutures Loose sutures Astigmatism Bow tie Corneal steepening Corneal flattening Horizontal torsion Wound misalignment 

References

*References Particularly Worth Reading

  1. 1.
    *Swinger CA. Postoperative astigmatism. Surv Ophthalmol. 1987;31:219–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    *van Rij G, Waring GO III. Changes in corneal curvature induced by sutures and incisions. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98:773–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Minkovitz JB, Stark WJ. Corneal complications of intraocular surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1995;6:79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koch DD, Haft EA, Gay C. Computerized videokeratographic analysis of corneal topographic changes induced by sutured and unsutured 4mm scleral pocket incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(Suppl):166–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eve FR, Troutman RC. Placement of sutures used in corneal incisions. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;82:786–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stainer GA, Binder PS, Parker WT, Perl T. The natural and modified course of postcataract astigmatism. Ophthalmic Surg. 1982;13:822–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Geggel HS. Effect of peripheral subepithelial fibrosis on corneal transplant topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:135–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin RG, Sanders DR, Miller JD, Cox CC, Ballew C. Effect of cataract wound incision size on acute changes in corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(Suppl):170–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iliff CE, Khodadoust A. Control of astigmatism in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;65:378–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    *Tripoli NK, Ibrahim OS, Coggins JM, et al. Quantitative and qualitative topography classification of clear penetrating keratopathies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;30(Suppl):480.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    *Karabatsas CH, Cook S, Sparrow JM. A proposed classification for topographic patterns seen after penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(4):403–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Price NC, Steele AD. The correction of post-keratoplasty astigmatism. Eye. 1987;1:562–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams KA, Roder D, Esterman A, et al. Factors predictive of corneal graft survival: report from the Australian corneal graft registry. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(3):403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Olson RJ, Pingree M, Ridges R, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a long-term review of results and complications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(7):987–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams KA, Hornsby NB, Bartlett CM, et al. Report from the Australian corneal graft registry. Adelaide: Tech. Rep., Snap Printing; 2004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Javadi MA, Motlagh BF, Jafarinasab MR, et al. Outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Cornea. 2005;24(8):941–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Troutman RC, Swinger CA. Relaxing incision for control of postoperative astigmatism following keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1980;90:131–6.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Troutman RC, Gaster RN. Surgical advances and results of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;90:131–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chow SP, Hopkinson CL, Tole DT, et al. Stability of visual outcome between 2 and 5 years following corneal transplantation in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(1):37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kwitko S, Garbus JJ, Hwang DG, Gauderman WJ, McDonnell PJ. Computer-assisted study of diurnal variation in corneal topography after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23:10–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    *Khong AM, Mannis MJ, Plotnik RD, Johnson CA. Computerised topographic analysis of the healing graft after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    *Chern KC, Meiser DM, Wilson SE, Macsai MS, Krasney RH. Small-diameter, round, eccentric penetrating keratoplasties and corneal topographic correlation. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:643–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Girard LJ, Rodriguez J, Mailman ML. Reducing surgically induced astigmatism by using a scleral tunnel. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;97:450–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nielsen PJ. Prospective evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism and astigmatic keratotomy effects of various self-sealing small incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kohnen T. Corneal shape changes and astigmatic aspects of scleral and corneal tunnel incisions [editorial]. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:301–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oshika T, Tsuboi S, Yaguchi S, Yoshitomi F, Nagamoto T, Nagahara K, Emi K. Comparative study of intraocular lens implantation through 3.2 and 5.5mm incisions. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    *Levy JH, Pisacano AM, Chadwick K. Astigmatic changes after cataract surgery with 5.1mm and 3.5mm sutureless incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:630–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    *Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. The correlation between incision size and corneal shape changes in sutureless cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:550–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kohnen T, Dick B, Jacobi KW. Comparison of the induced astigmatism after temporal clear corneal tunnel incisions of different sizes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:417–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Storr-Paulsen A, Henning V. Long-term astigmatic changes after phacoemulsification with single stitch, horizontal suture closure. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:429–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Long DA, Monica ML. A prospective evaluation of corneal curvature changes with 3.0- to 3.5-mm corneal tunnel phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:226–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vass C, Menapace R, Amon M, Hirsch U, Yousef A. Batch-by-batch analysis of topographic changes induced by sutured and sutureless clear corneal incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:324–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ernest PH. Corneal lip tunnel incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:154–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vass C, Menapace R, Rainer G. Corneal topographic changes after frown and straight sclerocorneal incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:913–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Filatov V, Alexandrakis G, Talamo JH, Steinert RF. Comparison of suture-in and suture-out postkeratoplasty astigmatism with single running suture or combined running and interrupted sutures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:696–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gorn RA. Surgically induced corneal astigmatism and its spontaneous regression. Ophthalmic Surg. 1985;16:162–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Singh D, Kumar K. Keratometric changes after cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1976;60:638–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dowling JL. Wound closure in cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Surg. 1981;12:574–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Floyd G. Changes in the corneal curvature following cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1951;34:1525–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jaffe NS, Clayman HM. The pathophysiology of corneal astigmatism after cataract extraction. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975;79:615–30.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wishart MS, Wishart PK, Gregor ZJ. Corneal astigmatism following cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1986;70:825–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kondrot EC. Keratometric cylinder and visual recovery following phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation using a self-sealing cataract incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991;17(Suppl):731–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Talamo JH, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD, Goodman DF, Pratzer K, Cravy TV, Enger C. Natural history of corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991;17:313–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    O’Driscoll AM, Goble RR, Hallack GN, Andrew NC. A prospective, controlled study of a 9/0 elastic polypropylene suture for cataract surgery: refractive results and complications. Eye. 1994;8:538–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Drews RC. Astigmatism after cataract surgery: nylon versus mersilene. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:70–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Serarevic ON, Renard GJ, Pouliquen Y. Randomised clinical trial comparing astigmatism and visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty with and without intraoperative suture adjustment. Ophthalmology. 1994;106:990–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Samples JR, Binder PS. The value of the Terry Keratometer in predicting postoperative astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:280–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Morlet N. Clinical utility of the Barrett keratoscope with astigmatic dial. Ophthalmic Surg. 1994;25:150–3.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Thall EH, Lange SR. Preliminary results of a new intraoperative corneal topography technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(Suppl):193–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    *Frantz JM, Reidy JJ, McDonald, MB. A comparison of surgical keratometers. Refract Corneal Surg. 1989;5:409–13.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    *Maguire LJ, Bourne WM. Corneal topography of transverse keratotomies for astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:323–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Krachmer JH, Fenzl RE. Surgical correction of high postkeratoplasty astigmatism: relaxing incisions vs wedge resection. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1400–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sugar J, Kirk A. Relaxing keratotomy for post-keratoplasty high astigmatism. Ophthalmic Surg. 1983;14:156–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lavery GW, Lindstrom RL, Hofer LA, Doughman DJ. The surgical management of corneal astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1985;16:165–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Güell JL, Manero F, Müller A. Transverse keratotomy to correct high corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:331–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lazzaro DR, Haight DH, Belmont SC, Gibralter RP, Aslanides IM, Odrich MG. Excimer laser keratectomy for astigmatism occurring after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:458–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Amm M, Duncker GIW, Schröder E. Excimer laser correction of high astigmatism after keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:313–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Serdarevic ON, Renard GJ, Pouliquen Y. Videokeratoscopy of recipient peripheral corneas in combined penetrating keratoplasty, cataract extraction, and lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    *Strelow S, Cohen EJ, Leavitt KG, Laibson PR. Corneal topography for selective suture removal after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;112:657–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Roper-Hall MJ. Control of astigmatism after surgery and trauma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982;66:556–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kronish JW, Forster RK. Control of corneal astigmatism following cataract extraction by selective suture cutting. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1650–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Potamitis T, Fouladi M, Eperjese F, McDonnell PJ. Astigmatism decay immediately following suture removal. Eye. 1997;11:84–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    *Navon SE. Topography after repair of full-thickness corneal laceration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Binder PS. Selective suture removal can reduce postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:1412–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Luntz MH, Livingstone DG. Astigmatism in cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977;61:360–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Atkins AD, Roper-Hall MJ. Control of postoperative astigmatism. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69:348–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie Corbett
    • 1
  • Nicholas Maycock
    • 2
  • Emanuel Rosen
    • 3
  • David O’Brart
    • 4
  1. 1.Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
  2. 2.University Hospital Coventry and WarwickshireCoventryUK
  3. 3.ManchesterUK
  4. 4.Department of OphthalmologySt. Thomas HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations