• Alexandre AnesiEmail author
  • Sara Negrello
  • Luigi Chiarini


In order to achieve an adequate oral rehabilitation after reconstruction of the jaw, a consistent prosthetic treatment is necessary.

The main determinants of implant stability are the mechanical properties of the bone tissue at the implant site, and how the contact between the implant neck and the cortical bone plate is achieved. If we presume a correct surgical technique and a good implant design, the bone density determines the primary implant stability at the time of surgery.

A stable implant can exhibit different degrees of displacement or resistance to load, which corresponds to varying degrees of stability. Conversely, a failed implant shows clinical mobility on the macroscale, as the implant is surrounded by a fibrous scar tissue. An increasing degree of micro-mobility is present until clinical failure of the implant.

This suggests that techniques to measure and to monitor implant micro-motion/stability could give the clinician the opportunity to optimize implant treatment. Insertion torque, Periotest, and resonance frequency analysis are suitable to measure primary implant stability.

Nevertheless, the resonance frequency analysis is the only method that can detect variations in different bone densities, which may be measured even during the follow-up of the implant.


Osseointegration Resonance frequency analysis Implant stability Implant survival Implant rehabilitation 


  1. 1.
    Urken ML, Weinberg H, Vickery C, Buchbinder D, Lawson W, Biller HF. Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite free flaps. Report of 71 cases and a new classification scheme for bony, soft-tissue, and neurologic defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(7):733–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sjöström M, Sennerby L, Nilson H, Lundgren S. Reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with free iliac crest grafts and implants: a 3-year report of a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9:46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Successcriteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:527–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 2008;47:51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bertossi D, Bissolotti G, Corrocher G, Anesi A, Nocini P-F. O.301 The use of tapered dental implants in severe jaw atrophies. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36:S76. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NHM, Tawse-Smith A, Duncan WJ. Piezoelectric versus conventional implant site preparation: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20:261–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anesi A, Ferretti M, Cavani F, Salvatori R, Bianchi M, Russo A, Chiarini L, Palumbo C. Structural and ultrastructural analyses of bone regeneration in rabbit cranial osteotomy: Piezosurgery versus traditional osteotomes. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(1):107–18. Epub 2017 Oct 12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bardyn T, Gédet P, Hallermann W, Büchler P. Quantifying the influence of bone density and thickness on resonance frequency analysis: an in vitro study of biomechanical test materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:1006–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trisi P, Perfetti G, Baldoni E, Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scogna G. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:467–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pagliani L, Sennerby L, Petersson A, Verrocchi D, Volpe S, Andersson P. The relationship between resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and lateral displacement of dental implants: an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sim CP, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:598–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kahraman S, Bal BT, Asar NV, Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF. Clinical study on the insertion torque and wireless resonance frequency analysis in the assessment of torque capacity and stability of self-tapping dental implants. J Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:755–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Song YD, Jun SH, Kwon JJ. Correlation between bone quality evaluated by cone-beam computerized tomography and implant primary stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:59–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Möhlhenrich SC, Kniha K, Elvers D, Ayoub N, Goloborodko E, Hölzle F, et al. Intraosseous stability of dental implants in free revascularized fibula and iliac crest bone flaps. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(12):1935–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mertens C, Decker C, Engel M, Sander A, Hoffmann J, Freier K. Early bone resorption of free microvascular reanastomized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction–a comparison of iliac crest and fibula grafts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(5):e217–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akkocaoglu M, Cehreli MC, Tekdemir I, Comert A, Güzel E, Dağdeviren A, et al. Primary stability of simultaneously placed dental implants in extraoral donor graft sites: a human cadaver study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(3):400–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandre Anesi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sara Negrello
    • 1
  • Luigi Chiarini
    • 1
  1. 1.Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery UnitUniversity Hospital of ModenaModenaItaly

Personalised recommendations