Advertisement

Schengen Visa Policy-Making: Shifting Competence While Authorizing Discretion

  • Federica InfantinoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the legally binding and self-executing text that regulates the procedures and conditions for issuing Schengen visas—the Visa Code—adopted following Community decision-making rules in 2009. EU visa policy is a compensatory measure to free movement whose initial characteristics are discretion and, unlike other historical examples of border-free regions, restrictiveness. The Visa Code is not created from scratch. In regard to the objective of consular action—the assessment of the migratory ‘risk’—it shows continuities with the Common Consular Instructions, drafted during the original Schengen process to which Belgium and France have participated. However, the Visa Code is less precise. Several conditions specific to EU legislative policy-making underline the vagueness of law and broadly worded instructions. The EU legal framework emerges as a source of national discretion. The chapter addresses discontinuities with the original Schengen process, most notably those stemming from the ‘friendly and unified Europe’ policy frame that has underlined the position of new institutional players involved in the adoption of the Visa Code. The Visa Code reveals foreign affairs concerns since EU visa policy is an area in which the image of unified Europe and of a friendly European border is at stake.

Keywords

EU foreign affairs Communitarization Security Policy frame Schengen area Visa Code 

References

  1. Albert, M., & Brock, L. (1996). Debordering the World of States: New Spaces in International Relations. New Political Science, 35, 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezes, P. (2009). Réinventer l’Etat. Les réformes de l’administration française. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  3. Bigo, D. (Ed.). (1992). L’Europe des polices et de la sécurité intérieure. Bruxelles: Ed. Complexe.Google Scholar
  4. Bigo, D. (1996). Polices en réseaux: l’expérience européenne. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  5. Bigo, D., & Guild, E. (2003). La mise à l’écart des étrangers: la logique du visa Schengen. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  6. Bouras, F., Nayer, A., Nys, M., Maesschalck, A., & Nolasco, P. (1995). Libre Circulation des Personnes. La protection des droits fondamentaux des citoyens au regard de la libre circulation des personnes dans le processus de construction des nouveaux espaces européens. ULB/CeRP, Final Report of the program Protection Juridique du Citoyen (1992–1995), Services fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques, et Culturelles.Google Scholar
  7. Cini, M. (2001). The Soft Law Approach: Commission Rule-Making in the EU’s State Aid Regim. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(2), 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duez, D. (2008). L’Union européenne et l’immigration clandestine. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  9. Guild, E. (2001). Moving the Borders of Europe. Inaugural Lecture, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. https://cmr.jur.ru.nl/cmr/docs/oratie.eg.pdf. Accessed 15 February 2018.
  10. Guiraudon, V. (2003). Before the EU Border: Remote Control of the ‘Huddled Masses’. In K. Groenendijk, E. Guild, & P. Minderhoud (Eds.), In Search of Europe’s Borders (pp. 191–214). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  11. Guiraudon, V. (2007). Anti-discrimination Policy. In P. Graziano & M. Vink (Eds.), Europeanization: A Handbook for a New Research Agenda (pp. 295–308). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Guiraudon, V. (2011). Schengen: une crise en trompe l’œil. Politique étrangère, 4, 773–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haas, E. B. (1964). Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization. Standford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Infantino, F. (2016). Outsourcing Border Control: Politics and Practice of Contracted Visa Policy in Morocco. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meloni, A. (2006). Visa Policy Within the European Union Structure. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Pollitt, C., & Talbot, C. (Eds.). (2004). Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Rea, A. (1999). Immigration, Etat et citoyenneté. La formation de la politique d’intégration des immigrés de la Belgique (PhD dissertation). Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  18. Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policies Controversies. New York: Basic Book.Google Scholar
  19. Sciortino, G. (1999). Planning in the Dark: The Evolution of Italian Immigration Control. In G. Brochmann & H. Hammar (Eds.), Mechanisms of Immigration Control (pp. 233–260). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FNRSUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations